长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (05): 668-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201405011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

滨海围垦区不同陆生植物配置模式对土壤有机碳储量及土壤呼吸的影响

曹流芳,仲启铖,刘 倩, 王 璐,陆 颖,王开运   

  1. (华东师范大学资源与环境科学学院,上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室,上海 200241)
  • 出版日期:2014-05-20

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PLANT ARRANGEMENT MODES ON SOIL ORGANIC CARBON STORAGE AND SOIL RESPIRATION IN A RECLAIMED COASTAL WETLAND

CAO Liufang,ZHONG Qicheng,LIU Qian ,WANG Lu,LU Ying,WANG Kaiyun   

  1. (Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and EcoRestoration,School of Resources and Environmental Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200041,China
  • Online:2014-05-20

摘要:

为了研究不同陆生植物配置模式对滨海围垦区土壤有机碳储量及土壤呼吸特征的影响,在崇明东滩围垦湿地公园栽植了8 a的湿地松纯林、湿地松紫穗槐混交林及紫穗槐纯林3种典型陆生植物配置模式,以裸地作为对照,采用Li6400便携式光合作用仪的土壤呼吸叶室对其土壤呼吸进行了测定,期间对土壤有机碳含量及土壤容重,影响土壤呼吸的土壤微气候因子、植物群落结构等进行了同步测定。结果表明:土层0~40 cm土壤有机碳储量变化范围为296~691 kg/m2:湿地松紫穗槐混交林>裸地>紫穗槐纯林>湿地松纯林,不同植物配置模式对土壤有机碳储量改善不同,湿地松与紫穗槐混交配置比纯林更有利于增加滨海围垦区土壤有机碳储量;土壤呼吸速率年平均值变化范围为274~519 μmol/(m2·s):紫穗槐纯林>湿地松紫穗槐混交林>湿地松纯林>裸地,土壤温度是影响滨海围垦区土壤呼吸的关键因子,各配置模式土壤呼吸的差异可能与其土壤有机碳储量及植物叶面积指数有关。可为滨海围垦区进行以增汇为目的人工管理提供科学依据

Abstract:

In order to understand the effects of different plant arrangement modes on soil organic carbon storage and soil respiration in reclaimed coastal wetlands,a study was made to investigate the characteristics of soil carbon storage and soil respiration under three typical plant arrangement modes,i.e.,pure slash pine plantation (Pinus elliottii),slash pine and Amorpha fruticosa mixed plantation,pure Amorpha fruticosa plantation which were planted for 8 years,bare as a control.Soil respiration was measured using LiCor 640009 soil chamber attachment,and soil organic carbon,soil bulk density,soil respiration and its major affecting environmental factors were monitored during that time.The result showed that:the rang of soil organic carbon storage in 0-40 cm soil layer was 296-691 kg/m2:Pinus elliottii+Amorpha fruticosa(PA)>Amorpha fruticosa(A)>Bare(B)>Pinus elliottii(P).The PA was beneficial to the sequestration of soil organic carbonas compared to other modles.The rang of mean soil was 274-519 μmol/m2·s:A>PA>P>B.Soil temperature was the key factor driving soil respiration.The differences of soil respiration in different modes maybe related to soil organic carbon storage and plant leaf area index.This study provides a scientific basis to increasing carbon sink by artificial afforestation in coastal reclamation areas

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 向 波,纪昌明,蓝霄峰,罗庆松. 地下水非稳定流问题的有限分析五点格式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 721 .
[3] 刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[4] 肖思思, 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 濮励杰, 陈 逸. 经济发达县域耕地土壤重金属污染评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 674 .
[5] 陈 逸,黄贤金,彭补拙,濮励杰,张 健 . 经济发达区不同土地利用方式下土壤中镉的含量特征——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 391 .
[6] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[7] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[8] 魏显虎|杜耘,蔡述明,薛怀平,刘韬,. 清江流域1995~2000年土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 120 -124 .
[9] 姚书春,薛 滨,夏威岚. 洪湖历史时期人类活动的湖泊沉积环境响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 475 -480 .
[10] 林建伟,王里奥, 赵建夫,张 军,袁 辉. 三峡库区生活垃圾的重金属污染程度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 104 -108 .