长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (09): 1285-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201409014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

金华江流域利用硅藻生物学特性监测水质研究

洪佳,王振钟,王丽丽,袁刚   

  1. (1.浙江省水利科技推广与发展中心,浙江 杭州 310012; 2.青岛本源环境技术发展有限公司,山东 青岛 266555)
  • 出版日期:2014-09-20

DIATOMBASED BIOMONITORING METHOD OF WATER QUALITY IN THE JINHUA RIVER BASIN

HONG Jia1,WANG Zhenzhong2,WANG Lili2, YUAN Gang1   

  1. (1.Science and Technology Promotion Centre of Water Resources of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou 310012, China;2. Qingdao Source Environmental Technology Development CO.,LTD,Qingdao 266555, China
  • Online:2014-09-20

摘要:

2012年7月对浙江省金华江流域18个监测断面进行了附着硅藻和水质调查,通过硅藻生态群落组成及SPI、BDI硅藻指数对水质进行了评价,并比较了硅藻指数评价与水质理化评价结果的异同性。本次调查共收集到硅藻75种(含变种和变型),隶属于2纲12科30属。硅藻生态类群组成显示各断面以喜中性、N自养、耐低污染和喜好很高氧饱和度硅藻为主。水质理化指标总体评价金华江各监测断面水质多为Ⅲ类及以上,仅有一个断面为V类,硅藻SPI和BDI指数评价各断面水质为中等及中等以上。二者评价结果总体上吻合,但同时存在一定差异。SPI与高锰酸盐指数和硝酸盐氮呈显著负相关,BDI与氨氮呈显著负相关。硅藻指数在金华江流域有一定的适用性,但其在国内其他流域的适用性、评价方法的指示性与稳定性有待进行更深入的研究

Abstract:

Diatom,as a kind of autotrophic photosynthetic eukaryotic algae,is an important primary producer in aquatic ecosystem,and can reflect the average status of water environment. Diatoms are widely used in stream bioassessment due to their broad distribution,extraordinary variability and the ability to integrate changes in water quality. The indices of Specific Polluosensitivity Index (SPI),standardized Biological Diatom Index (BDI),European Economic Community Index (CEC) and Generic Diatom Index (GDI),originally developed in France,are often applied to evaluate stream ecological quality based on diatom communities. Diatom assemblages were collected from 18 sampling stations in the Jinhua River Basin in July 2012. Dissolved oxygen,pH,total phosphorus,total nitrogen,chemical oxygen demand,ammonium nitrogen,and biochemical oxygen demand after five days were measured. A total of 75 taxa were identified,belonging to 2 classes,12 families,30 genera. The similarities and differences were compared between diatombased method and physicochemical method. The physicchemical parameters showed that the water quality level was from Grade I to Grade V,while diatom index showed its quality was at medium level or above the medium. These two assessment results were almost identical as a whole although differences between them did occur. For diatom ecotype,the results showed that all sites were dominated by circumneutral,oligosaprobous and βmesosaprobous,Nautotrophic,continuously high aerobic diatom taxa. There were negative significant relationship between SPI and permanganate index and nitrate nitrogen. There was negative significant relationship between BDI and ammonia nitrogen. The results of the present study provide a good experience for biomonitoring in the Jinhua River Basin,but more researches are needed in order to establish Chinese biomonitoring standard

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .