长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (12): 2153-2158.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201512020

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

北川震后重构聚落的地质灾害灾情分析

张雅茜, 汤家法, 胥忞旻, 杜春苗   

  1. 西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院, 四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-10 修回日期:2015-07-21 出版日期:2015-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 汤家法 E-mail:tajava@home.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张雅茜(1991~),女,硕士研究生,主要从事山地灾害方面的研究.E-mail:zyaxi1991@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJAZH124)

ANALYSIS ON GEOLOGICAL DISASTERS OCCURRED IN THE RECONSTRUCTED SETTLEMENTS SPACE AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE IN BEICHUAN

ZHANG Ya-xi, TANG Jia-fa, XU Min-min, DU Chun-miao   

  1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2015-03-10 Revised:2015-07-21 Online:2015-12-20

摘要: 北川羌族自治县是2008年"5·12"地震的极重灾区,地震给其境内的各类城乡建筑造成了严重的损失,经过3 a多的灾后重建,该县聚落空间得到快速的重构。2013年的7·9洪灾之后,北川境内的地质灾害事件全面爆发,给重构聚落空间的安全造成了严重的威胁。以2013年7·9洪灾之后的灾情普查数据和北川的土地利用图为基础数据,利用GIS技术,使用最邻近法及主成份分析法分析评价了北川境内聚落空间的地质灾害灾情特征,并根据各个聚落斑块的灾情指数值的大小将其划分为灾情轻微、较重、严重和极严重的4个等级。评价的结果表明:北川县境内共有1 016个聚落斑块受到地质灾害点的威胁,占聚落斑块总数的5.702%;其中,灾情极重的聚落有45个、灾情严重的聚落有64个、灾情较重的聚落有775个、灾情较轻的聚落有132个。该评价结果可以为地方政府根据各受灾聚落灾情的轻重缓急而制定出科学的防灾减灾决策提供基本依据。

关键词: 重构聚落, 地质灾害, 灾情评价, 北川羌族自治县

Abstract: Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County was the very seriously destroyed area during the 2008's earthquake, with all kinds of urban and rural buildings greatly damaged because of the earthquake. The region's settlement space has been rapidly reconstructed during the post-disaster reconstruction of three years. However, the natural environment is not yet stable, coupled with the frequency of extreme weather events in recent years, a number of potential threats gradually were exposed, causing a number of catastrophic events in the settlement space of reconstruction after the earthquake. Particularly, the geological disasters broke out in Beichuan after the 7.9 flood disaster in 2013, causeing serious security threat to the settlement space of reconstruction. In this paper, the census data of disaster after the 7.9 flood disaster in 2013 and land use data of Beichuan were selected to analyze and evaluate the characteristics of geological hazard of the settlement space in Beichuan based on GIS technology, the nearest neighbor method and the principal component analysis method. Eventually, we calculated the disaster index of various settlement plaques, and divided them into four grades based on the size of the disaster index value as follows: mild, heavy, serious and very serious. The evaluation results showed that a total 1016 settlement patches are threatened by geological disasters points in the Territory of Beichuan County, accounting for 5.7 percent of the total settlement plaques. Among them, there are 45 settlements are very seriously destroyed by geological disasters and 64 settlements are seriously destroyed by geological disasters, 775 settlements are heavily destroyed by geological disasters, and 132 settlements are slightly destroyed by geological disasters. The evaluation results can provide a fundamental basis for local government to develop a scientific decision to disaster prevention and mitigation according to the disaster priorities of each affected settlements.

Key words: reconstruction settlement, geological disasters, disaster evaluation, Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County

中图分类号: 

  • X43
[1] 齐 信,唐 川,铁永波,等.基于GIS技术的汶川地震诱发地质灾害危险性评价--以四川省北川县为例[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2010,37(2):160-167.
[2] 黄 庭,张 志,谷延群,等.基于遥感和GIS技术的北川县地震次生地质灾害分布特征[J].遥感学报,2009,13(1):177-182.
[3] 唐 川,铁永波.汶川震区北川县城魏家沟暴雨泥石流灾害调查分析[J].山地学报,2009,27(5):625-630.
[4] 胡凯衡,游 勇,庄建琦,等.北川地震重灾区泥石流特征与减灾对策[J].地理科学,2010,30(4):566-570.
[5] 朱忠礼,刘希林,尚志海.四川省北川县赵家沟地震次生泥石流形成条件分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2010,21(4):57-62.
[6] 刘 剑,葛永刚,张建强,等.北川湔江河段"7·10"特大山洪泥石流灾害特征与成因分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4):44-50.
[7] 汤家法,王 沁.2013年北川聚落空间的地质灾害灾情分析[J].灾害学,2015,30(1):87-91.
[8] 周成虎,程维明,钱金凯.数字地貌遥感解析与制图[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:29-30.
[9] 朱星宇,陈勇强.SPSS多元统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011:240-241.
[10] 刘臣辉,吕信红,范海燕.主成份分析法用于环境质量评价的探讨[J].环境科学与管理,2011,36(3):183-186.
[11] 国家减灾委员会,科学技术部抗震救灾专家组.汶川地震灾害综合分析与评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:96-97.
[1] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .