长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (7): 1603-1613.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202107008

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江涪江小河坝站水沙关系特性及其驱动因素研究

夏绍钦,张会兰* ,郝佳欣,杨  军   

  1. (北京林业大学水土保持学院重庆缙云三峡库区森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,北京 100083)
  • 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-08-03

Characteristics of Runoff-Sediment Rating Curves and Corresponding Driving Factors at Xiaoheba Station on Fu River, Yangtze River

XIA Shao-qin, ZHANG Hui-lan, HAO Jia-xin, YANG Jun   

  1. (Three-Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
  • Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-08-03

摘要: 涪江流域是三峡入库水沙的主要来源地之一。基于涪江流域出口水文站1980~2018年的日径流、输沙率实测数据,从不同时间尺度分析水沙序列、水沙关系特性,并量化气象条件和人类活动两类驱动因素的影响。结果表明:(1)年尺度上,流域多年平均径流量、年输沙量呈显著下降趋势,以1997和2012年为转折年,呈典型的三阶段特性;月尺度上,径流和输沙量主要集中在7、8、9月;日尺度上,径流和输沙的集中度指数分别为0.5、0.91,表明“大水大沙”现象日益突出。(2)基于长时期序列的水沙关系曲线分析结果显示,外界影响因子(a)呈显著上升趋势,河流输沙能力因子(b)呈显著下降趋势;基于洪水场次事件的水沙环路曲线分析结果显示,顺时针和逆时针环路为两类主要的C-Q环路类型,分别呈下降和上升趋势,表明人类活动因素的增加和河流输沙能力的降低。(3)人类活动因素是影响涪江流域水沙变化的主要驱动因素,对径流和产沙量的贡献率占到86%和97%以上。以上结果可为长江流域水沙资源管理提供基础数据和科学依据。

Abstract: The Fu River watershed is one of the major sources of runoff and sediment into the Three Gorges Reservoir. Based on observations of daily runoff and sediment transport rate from 1980-2018 at the hydrological station of Fu River watershed, this study carried out analyses on runoff-sediment time series and rating curves on multiple temporal scales, and quantitatively differentiated contribution rates of meteorological conditions and human activities. Results showed that: (1) On an annual scale, the means of annual runoff and sediment discharge exhibited significant downward trends and typical three-stage characteristics, taking 1997 and 2012 as the turning years; On a monthly scale, high values of runoff and sediment discharge mainly occurred in July, August and September; On a daily scale, the Concentration Indices of runoff and sediment are 0.5 and 0.91 respectively, indicating that extreme events runoff and sediment became more urgent. (2) Long-term rating curve analyses showed that the external driving factor a presented a significant upward trend, while the sediment transport factor b exhibited a significant downward trend; Event-based analyses on Concentration-Discharge loops showed that, clockwise and counterclockwise loops were two prominent types of C-Q loops. Frequencies of occurrence of the above two types presented downward and upward trends, respectively, demonstrating increased effect of human activities and decreased effect of river sediment transport capacity. (3)Human activities were proved to be the primary driving factor, and corresponding contribution rates to runoff and sediment discharge accounted for more than 86% and 97%, respectively. The above conclusions could provide basic data and scientific evidences for management of runoff and sediment resources in the Yangtze River Basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 潘明麒, 于秀波. 洞庭湖湿地生态系统管理面临的威胁及应对策略初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(06): 729 .
[2] 赵 帅 | 柴立和. 流域水资源丰富度评价的MFP模型及应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 698 .
[3] 项小燕, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 王志高, 张中信, 王广艳, 张小平. 大别山五针松种群结构及动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 55 -62 .
[4] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[5] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[6] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[7] 杨宏, 李会琳, 路璐. 嘉陵江(南充段)水体及其底泥中氨氧化微生物群落空间分布特征及其与环境因子关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1836 .
[8] 李恩康, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 黄群芳, 郭 政. 城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于江苏13个市的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[9] 魏国恩, 朱 翔, 贺清云. 环长株潭城市群空间联系演变特征与对策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1958 -1967 .
[10] 啜明英, 马骏, 刘德富, 杨正健. 整流幕对香溪河库湾水温特性影响数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2101 -2113 .