长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (6): 1300-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202506012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国环境规制强度的时空演变及其影响因素

万庆1,潘晓宇1,徐萌2,潘方杰1*   

  1. 从环境规制工具异质性的角度,重新构建中国省域环境规制强度测度指标体系,采用熵值法加权计算不同省份环境规制强度指数,并考察中国环境规制强度的时空演化特征及其驱动机理。研究发现:(1)2000~2020年,中国环境规制强度整体呈波动上升态势,且阶段性特征明显。(2)中国环境规制强度存在显著的区域差异并呈扩大态势,整体表现出“东部>中部>西部>东北”梯度分异特征。(3)中国环境规制存在显著的空间正相关关系,且在2010年以前以低值集聚为主,2010年之后则并不存在居主导地位的集聚类型,省区之间环境规制策略性互动形式更加多样化。(4)中国绝大多数省份环境规制强度的局部空间结构相对稳定,但考察期内半数以上省份的空间关联类型发生跃迁。(5)在不同阶段,发展水平、产业结构、政府干预、对外开放、人力资本和城镇化等因子对中国环境规制强度空间分异的影响存在显著异质性,各因子交互作用以双因子增强为主。
  • 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-27

Spatial-temporal Evolution of Environmental Regulation Intensity and Influencing Factors in China

WAN Qing1,PAN Xiao-yu1,XU Meng2,PAN Fang-jie1   

  1. From the perspective of the heterogeneity of environmental regulation tools, we reconstructed the index system for measuring environmental regulation intensity in Chinese regions.The entropy method was used to weight regional environmental regulation intensity indices.The spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of China's environmental regulation intensity and associated driving mechanism were examined.The results showed that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, China's regional environmental regulation intensity as a whole showed a fluctuating upward trend, and the stage characteristics were obvious.(2) There existed significant regional differences in China's environmental regulation intensity, and the trend was widening, showing an overall gradient differentiation characteristic.(3) There was a significant positive spatial correlation of environmental regulation in China, with low-value agglomeration predominating before 2010, but no dominant type of agglomeration after 2010, and more diversified strategic interactions between regions in terms of environmental regulation.(4) The local spatial structure of environmental regulation intensity was relatively stable in the vast majority of China's provinces, but the type of spatial correlation changed in more than half of the provinces.(5) At different stages, there existed significant heterogeneity in the effects of factors such as the level of economic development, industrial structure, government intervention, degree of openness, human capital and degree of urbanization on the spatial differentiation of environmental regulation intensity in China.The interaction of these factors was mainly strengthened by a two-factor interaction
  • Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-27
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐宇阳 |郑林 |王盼盼 |舒 芮 |侯 颖. 南方沙化土地治理中的农户行为实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 441 .
[2] 付姗, 吴琴, 郑艳明, 胡启武. 鄱阳湖沙山植物叶片与土壤C∶N、C∶P沿沙化梯度分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 447 .
[3] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[4] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[5] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[6] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[7] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[8] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[9] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[10] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .