长江流域资源与环境 >> 2012, Vol. 21 >> Issue (03): 302-.

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

三江源区气候及水文变化特征研究

刘光生|王根绪| 张伟   

  1. (1.山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所| 四川 成都 610041; 2.中国科学院研究生院| 北京 100049; 3.兰州大学资源环境学院| 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 出版日期:2012-03-20

RESEARCH ON CLIMATE AND RUNOFF VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS IN THE THREERIVER HEADWATER REGION

LIU Guangsheng1,2, WANG Genxu1, ZHANG Wei3   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory of Terrestrial Processes in Mountainous Regions and Ecological Control, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China|2.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China|3.School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Online:2012-03-20

摘要:

以1961~2007年三江源区的气象及径流资料为基础,采用MK法和R/S分析法分析三江源区气候及水文要素变化趋势及进行未来变化趋势预测,并采用主成分分析法判定径流过程的主要驱动要素。研究表明:三江源区气温普遍显著升高,水面蒸发和地温随着气温的升高也不断增加,降水的增加并不显著,而年径流尤其是夏秋季节径流存在明显减小的趋势。R/S分析结果表明气候和水文要素未来总体的变化趋势与过去一致。三江源区径流过程是由气温起主导作用,径流对气温变化较降水变化更为敏感。本研究将为三江源区水资源开发利用及优化配置提供科学借鉴,同时为三江源区的生态建设和保护提供参考依据

Abstract:

Based on the meteorological and runoff data of the ThreeRiver Headwater Region during 1961~2007,the change trend of climatic and hydrological factors and the tendency predict in the future were analyzed by the MannKendall technique and Rescaled range analysis.Meanwhile,principal component analysis was used to judge the main driving factor.The results showed that air temperature increased sharply and water surface evaporation and soil temperature increased with the increase of air temperature,whereas the increasing tendency of precipitation was unremarkable.The annual runoff,especially summer and autumn runoff,reduced sharply and the runoff coefficient also showed a decreasing trend.The result of Rescaled range analysis showed that the variation trend of future was identical to the past.The air temperature, soil temperature and water surface evaporation were the leading driving factors of the runoff process,and the increase of them caused the decrease of runoff. However,the increase of precipitation caused the increase of runoff.This study should be helpful for local water resources planning and management,and also should be significant for the study of the influence of global warming on ecosystem evolution,permafrost degradation and water resources safety. 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杜昌文,周健民,王火焰. 聚合物包膜肥料研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 725 -730 .
[2] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[3] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[4] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[5] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[6] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[7] 蔡海生, 肖复明, 张学玲. 基于生态足迹变化的鄱阳湖自然保护区生态补偿定量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 623 .
[8] 王月容, 周金星, 周志翔, 孙启祥. 洞庭湖退田还湖区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分库的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 634 .
[9] 段金荣, 张红燕, 刘凯, 徐东坡, 张敏莹, 施炜纲. 湖泊的宜渔性评价研究——以蠡湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 666 .
[10] 余真真, 王玲玲, 戴会超, 成高峰. 三峡水库香溪河库湾水温分布特性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 84 .