长江流域资源与环境 >> 2012, Vol. 21 >> Issue (03): 327-.

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江流域逐月气温空间插值方法的探讨

许民|王雁|周兆叶| 叶柏生   

  1. (1.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所|甘肃 兰州 730000;2.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所国家重点实验室|甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 出版日期:2012-03-20

DISCUSSION OF METHODS OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATION FOR MONTHLY TEMPERATURE DATA IN THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN

XU Min1,2|WANG Yan1,2|ZHOU Zhaoye1,2|YE Baisheng1,2   

  1. (1.Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Cryophereic Science,Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China
  • Online:2012-03-20

摘要:

长江流域地形地貌特征复杂。为了探索适合长江流域的逐月气温数据空间插值方法,在考虑海拔、经纬度、坡度、坡向对气温影响和没有考虑这些地形因子对气温影响的两种情况下,利用流域151个气象站2007年逐月气温与对应的站点地形因子进行回归分析,并与回归直线截距相加产生栅格化的回归气温值,同时对回归多项式的残差分别运用反距离权重法(IDW)、普通克立格法(OK)和样条函数法(SPLINE)气温进行了空间插值,然后将栅格化的回归气温值与残差的插值结果相加得到空间化的逐月气温数据,并利用交叉检验方法对插值精度进行了评估。结果表明:考虑了地形因子影响的3种插值方法的精度都有比较明显的提高,对于普通克立格法,平均绝对误差(MAE)从103℃降到060℃,均方根误差(RMSE)从238℃降到123℃;对于反距离权重法,MAE从110℃降到065℃,RMSE从248℃降到138℃;对于样条插值法,MAE从124℃降到074℃,RMSE从266℃降到151℃。考虑了地形因子影响的空间插值方法整体上要优于没有考虑地形因子的空间插值方法,其中,基于地形因子的普通克里格插值方法结果相对较好

Abstract:

There is complex terrain in the Yangtze River basin.In order to explore the best suitable method for monthly temperature data spatial interpolation,we used the monthly temperature data which was gained from stations of the Yangtze River basin in 2007 for spatial interpolation experiment,and considered the altitude,latitude and longitude,slope,aspect effects on the temperature.We used monthly temperature of 151 stations in the basin of 2007,and did regression analysis between the site topography and temperature.Intercept of the regression line with the sum of the return generated temperature value of the grid.Meanwhile,the residual of polynomial regression were used by antidistance weighting (IDW),Ordinary Kriging (OK) and the spline function method (SPLINE) spatial interpolation.Then return to the grid of the interpolated temperature value and the results added to get the residuals of the monthly temperature.The results showed that better simulation would be achieved if topography were taken into consideration. MAE and RMSE by OK decreased from 103℃ to 060℃ and from 238℃ to 123℃,respectively;for IDW,from 110℃ to 065 ℃ and from 248℃ to 138℃,respectively;for SPLINE,from 124℃ to 07℃ and from 166℃ to 151℃,respectively.It revealed OK gave the best simulation which take topography into consideration

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨钟贤, 刘邵权, 苏春江. 汶川地震重灾区交通通达性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1166 .
[2] 何报寅, 梁胜文, 丁超, 杨小琴, 胡 柯. 利用中巴地球资源卫星数据反演武汉市湖泊营养状态指数[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1181 .
[3] 陈宏文|张萌|刘足根|张柱|方红亚. 赣江流域淡水生态系统完整性与健康状态的鱼类F-IBI值评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1098 .
[4] 嵇涛|杨华|何太蓉. 重庆主城区建设用地扩展的时空特征及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 60 .
[5] 张 雄,刘 飞,林鹏程,王剑伟,曹文宣. 金沙江下游鱼类栖息地评估和保护优先级研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(04): 496 .
[6] 李 飞,徐 敏. 海州湾保护区海洋环境质量综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(05): 659 .
[7] 周克昊,刘艳芳,谭荣辉. 长江中游城市群综合发展水平时空分异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1502 .
[8] 赵天瑶, 曹鹏, 刘章勇, 蒋哲,金涛. 基于CVM的荆州市稻田生态系统的景观休闲旅游价值评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 498 .
[9] 何凌云, 杨雪杰, 尹芳, 钟章奇, 金里程. 综合性能源价格指数对中国省域碳强度的调节作用及其比较——来自30个省份面板数据的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 877 -888 .