长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (02): 200-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

亚热带常见树种幼苗对酸雨的生理响应及敏感性综合评判

姚芳芳 ||冯丽丽 |杨颂宇 |王希   

  1. (1. 华东师范大学环境科学系|上海 200062;2. 浙江天童森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站|浙江 宁波 315114;3.上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院|上海 200240
  • 出版日期:2013-02-20

PHYSIOLOGIC RESPONSES OF SEEDLINGS OF SUBTROPICAL SPECIES TO ACID RAIN AND COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION ON SENSITIVITY  

YAO Fangfang1,2, FENG Lili1,3,YANG Songyu1,2, WANG Xihua1,2   

  1. (1. School of Resource and Environment Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;2. Tiantong National Station of Forest Ecosystem, Chinese National Ecosystem Observation and Research Network, Ningbo 315114, China;3.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Online:2013-02-20

摘要:

以杨梅(Myrica rubra)、香樟(Cinnamomum camphora)、木荷(Schima superba)、枫香(Liquidambar formosana)、湿地松(Pinus elliottii)和水杉(Metasequoia glyptostroboides)6个亚热带常见树种为试验材料,对其在模拟酸雨胁迫下幼苗叶片光合气体交换参数、叶绿素含量、丙二醛含量和相对电导率等9个生理指标进行测定,以单项指标的耐酸系数为依据,运用主成分分析和隶属函数法对树种耐酸性进行综合评判。结果表明:中度酸雨对植物的气体交换和质膜没有造成明显影响;但在重度酸雨胁迫下,叶片净光合速率、气孔导度、蒸腾速率和水分利用效率等光合气体交换参数明显下降,叶片的相对电导率和丙二醛含量均显著上升。通过主成分分析将与幼苗耐酸性相关的生理指标转化成2个相互独立的综合指标,累积贡献率达88.064%;采用隶属函数法和聚类分析将6个树种按耐酸性强弱划分为3类:杨梅和湿地松为高抗酸树种,香樟、枫香和木荷为中等敏感树种,水杉属敏感型树种。该评价结果与其田间试验结果一致,因此所建立的综合评价方法可用来对幼苗耐酸性强弱进行客观、准确评价

Abstract:

In order to explore the indices and comprehensive evaluation of sensitivity to acid rain,six seedlings of subtropical species,including Myrica rubra,Cinnamomum camphora,Schima superba,Liquidambar formosana,Pinus elliottii and Metasequoia glyptostroboides were taken as test materials and exposed to simulated acid rain (SAR) with different pH values (pH 3.5,pH 2.5,and local reservoir water of pH 50-54 as the control).Gas exchange parameters,the chlorophyll content,membrane penetration and malondialdehyde content(MDA)were determined after treated for four months.The results showed SAR at pH 35 was unlikely to cause significant damage on gas exchange parameters and cell membrane,while pH 25 treatment altered gas exchange parameters significantly,net photosynthetic rate (pn),stomata conductance(gs),transpiration rate(Tr)and water use efficiency(WUE)were significantly declined.Compared with the controls,the membrane penetration and MDA contents in the seedling leaves under pH 25 treatment were increased significantly.The characters of seedlings behaved variously in their susceptibility to acid rain,therefore it was essential to apply more than one index to give a comprehensive evaluation on stress resistant.Principal component analysis could transfer many correlating indices into several independent comprehensive indices with little original information lost.Based on the test results,seven correlated single indices which had very close relationship with the acidic tolerance characters,were transferred into two independent comprehensive,with contribution ratio of accumulative total of 88.064%.Then,according to acidic tolerance coefficients and standardization eigenvector of seven respective charcters of each variety,two comprehensive indices scores could be calculated.The comprehensive evaluation value of each seedling acidic tolerance (D value) could be decuced by weighting sum the subordinative values and weight coefficient of the two comprehensive indices scores.The acidic tolerance of six subtropical species could be distinguished by hierachical cluster analysis,and M.rubra and P.elliottii were the strongest tolerance,followed by C.camphora,L.formosana,S.superba,and M.glyptostroboides was the weakest.The evaluation results accorded with their behavior in the field,which suggested the method could give an objective and precise evaluation on the sensitivity to acid rain between different species of seedlings

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[2] 唐 琦,虞孝感. 长江三角洲地区经济可持续发展问题初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 269 -273 .
[3] 王海云,高太忠,高京,黄群贤. 基于AHPLP法的南水北调中线水资源优化配置[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 588 .
[4] 张 燕, 张 洪, 彭补拙. 土地资源、环境与经济发展的协调性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 529 .
[5] 黄锡生,唐绍均. 三峡库区环境安全保护法律实施机制探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 611 -615 .
[6] 张孝飞,林玉锁,俞 飞,李 波. 城市典型工业区土壤重金属污染状况研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 512 -515 .
[7] 廖富强,刘 影, 叶慕亚,郑 林. 鄱阳湖典型湿地生态环境脆弱性评价及压力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 133 .
[8] 赵姚阳,濮励杰,胡晓添. BP神经网络在城市建成区面积预测中的应用——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 14 -18 .
[9] 许健民, 吕开宇, 娄博杰. 农业生产对土壤盐渍化影响的经济分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 132 .
[10] 刘 俊 陆玉麒. 经济快速发展地区土地利用结构的时空演变——以苏锡常地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 307 .