长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (06): 774-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201406005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

补贴期后农户退耕还林的态度研究——以重庆万州为例

喻永红   

  1. (浙江大学管理学院/浙江大学中国农村发展研究院,浙江 杭州 310058)
  • 出版日期:2014-06-20

STUDY ON FARMERS ATTITUDES TOWARD THE GRAIN FOR GREEN AFTER THE ENDING OF GOVERNMENTAL SUBSITY A CASE OF WANZHOU DISTRICT IN CHONGQING

YU Yonghong   

  1. (College of Management, Zhejiang University/China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Online:2014-06-20

摘要:

如何在项目结束停止补贴后长期巩固退耕还林成果,是政府和全社会共同关注的焦点。基于重庆万州退耕农户的微观调查数据,采用Ordered probit方法首次就补贴期后的农户退耕还林态度进行实证分析。数据显示,有相当大一部分农户在补贴结束不会再继续为退耕还林做出努力,项目的可持续性令人担忧;对补贴期后农户退耕还林态度的影响因素分析发现,男性、文化程度较高、非党员和非农就业的户主在补贴期后保持退耕还林的积极性较低;劳动力较多、年人均收入较低、退耕面积较大和还生态林的农户保持退耕还林的积极性较低。结论建议在现有的直接经济补偿结束后,尽快建立与生态服务提供紧密相连的生态补偿机制,并通过多种非货币性补偿方式保障退耕农户的利益。最后根据研究结果给出了巩固退耕还林成果的相关措施

Abstract:

How to consolidate achievements of the Grain for Green Program after its governmental subsidy scheme is the focus of government and the whole society. Based on the household survey data from Wanzhou District in Chongqing, this paper applies the ordered probit method to empirically analyze the farmers attitudes toward Grain for Green Program without subsidy. Data shows that a considerable number of the sampled farmers will not continue to pay efforts for maintaining the reforested lands without subsidy, and sustainability of the Program is worrying. Analysis on the factors influencing farmers attitudes to maintaining the Programs achievements indicates that households whose heads are male, noncommunists, with few education and offfarm employment will have negative attitudes, and households with more labors, lower annual per capital income, more reforested area and ecological forests will also have negative attitudes. Results suggest that it should establish ecological compensation mechanism closely related to the provision of the Program ecological services as soon as possible during the late stage of the present direct economic subsidy and use multiple nonmonetary compensation methods to safeguard farmers economic interests. Based on the research results, this paper also gives several concrete measures to consolidate the Program achievements

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张昌顺,李 昆,马姜明,郑志新. 施肥对印楝人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 329 .
[2] 赵 伟,谢德体,刘洪斌,. 重庆市景观格局动态变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 47 .
[3] 杨德伟,陈治谏,倪华勇,蒋 莉,廖晓勇. 基于能值分析的四川省生态经济系统可持续性评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 303 -309 .
[4] 白仙富,戴雨芡,史正涛. 拉市海流域胁迫因子及其影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 131 -136 .
[5] 霍 莉,王少平,郑丽波. 基于ArcGIS Engine的污染源数据库系统开发与应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 667 .
[6] 刘英华,张世熔, 张素兰, 魏 甦, 肖鹏飞. 成都平原地下水硝酸盐含量空间变异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 114 -118 .
[7] 郭艳娜 冯新斌 闫海鱼 钱晓莉 孟 博 姚 珩. 乌江流域梯级水库入出库河流中总汞和甲基汞的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 356 .
[8] 曾小凡 翟建青 苏布达 姜 彤 朱 进. 长江流域年平均气温的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 427 .
[9] 叶正伟, 朱国传. 洪泽湖流域洪涝灾害演变趋势及其与El Nio事件关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1086 .
[10] 周文霞, 陈笑媛, 郭旭辉. 土地利用规划环境影响评价的实例研究——以贵州省毕节地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1132 .