长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (11): 1627-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201411020

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模糊集合理论的中国区域土地覆盖数据集融合及精度分析

崔林丽, 陈昭, 尹球, 唐世浩, 刘荣高   

  1. (1. 上海市气象局,上海 201199;2. 复旦大学信息科学与工程学院电子工程系,上海 200433;3. 国家卫星气象中心,北京 10081;4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
  • 出版日期:2014-11-20

CHINA LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION FUSION BASED ON EXPERT DECISION AND ACCURACY ANALYSIS

CUI Linli1, CHEN Zhao2, YIN Qiu1, TANG Shihao3, LIU Ronggao4   

  1. (1. Shanghai Center of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Shanghai 201199,China; 2.School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433,China; 3. National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081,China; 4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,China
  • Online:2014-11-20

摘要:

全球土地覆盖的特征及其空间分布的信息是理解人类活动与全球变化之间复杂相互作用的关键信息来源,对全球变化研究至关重要。目前欧美等国家相继研制了全球范围的土地利用覆盖数据集,并对全球科学界免费提供,这些数据集为人类提供了更加准确的、完整的全球土地覆盖信息。然而,全球范围的土地利用覆盖数据集的种类多,特点不一,因此需要结合其优点,以适用于中国陆面。采用了一种基于模糊集合理论的数据融合方法,对主要数据集进行中国区域土地覆盖数据集融合分类重建,并结合高分辨率卫星分类结果进行了一致性检验分析。检验分析表明该方法能够兼容多种数据集的特点,该项成果可用于全国和区域数值模式以及生态环境评价等进一步研究应用

Abstract:

Land cover plays a significant role in the earth system science, which reflects the influence of human activities and environmental changes. Within the past decades, several global land cover datasets derived from satellite observations, free of charge, have become available to the scientific community in Europe and America. They offer valuable information on the current state of the land surface. However, considerable disagreements among their classification legends pose significant errors and uncertainties in the use of such datasets. This paper proposes a fuzzysettheorybased method to fuse several land cover classification products for China. First of all, a set of (say, n) target classification legends are defined prior to the fusion process. No doubt that they should be compatible to the classification legends of the original products to be fused. Moreover, each of the target legend must correspond to at least one original legend. Secondly, each original legend is assigned to an affinity score for each target legend, which indicates how much the former agrees with the latter. Scoring, regarded as a technique based on fuzzy theory, is usually performed by experts according to semantic rules. Scoring is followed by the voting and decisionmaking procedure. Among the affinity scores of a pixel, the highest one suggests that the pixel falls into the target class linked by itself. In addition, we have also exploited spatial correlation by weighting the affinity scores of the neighboring pixels. When fusion is completed, a synthetic map (SYNMAP) combining the features of all original classification products is created. Overall consistency of class between SYNMAP and each land cover is engaged to evaluate the fusion method. All the datasets, including SYNMAP, are evaluated after being further categorized into a few of simple classes, each of which include several original or target legends. Note that classification accuracy, which offers an absolute index and is commonly seen, is not presented in the paper since we are short of ground truth data. Nevertheless, the goal of the fuzzytheorybased method is to produce a fused map that accommodates all the advantages of different original land cover data sets and reconcile their discrepancy caused by the disagreement of different classification system. Therefore, the index of consistency between two land covers should suffice. In our experiment, ESA, MODIS/IGBP, MODIS/UMD, and MODIS/PFT are employed as the original land covers to be fused. IGBP legends are set as the target. Meanwhile, nine simple classes are used during evaluation. Overall consistencies indicate improved agreement of SYNMAP with all the other land cover products. It means that the proposed fusion method has successfully combined various features of different land cover products. The conclusions can be used for national and regional numerical model and ecological environment evaluation for further research and applications

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[4] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[5] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[9] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[10] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .