长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (03): 433-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201503012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态系统水平的洞庭湖生态风险评价

沈新平,袁玉洁,周柏林, 肖义, 谢石, 刘晓群,汤小俊, 舒晓玲, 李志军, 梁婕, 余勋   

  1. (1.湖南省洞庭湖水利工程管理局,湖南 长沙 410007; 2.湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082; 3.湖南大学环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 出版日期:2015-03-20

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF DONGTING LAKE BASED ON ECOSYSTEM LEVEL

SHEN Xinping1, YUAN Yujie2,3, ZHOU Bolin1, XIAO Yi1, XIE Shi1, LIU Xiaoqun1, TANG Xiaojun1, SHU Xiaoling1, LI Zhijun1, LIANG Jie2,3, YU Xun2,3   

  1. SHEN Xinping1, YUAN Yujie2,3, ZHOU Bolin1, XIAO Yi1, XIE Shi1, LIU Xiaoqun1, TANG Xiaojun1, SHU Xiaoling1, LI Zhijun1, LIANG Jie2,3, YU Xun2,3
  • Online:2015-03-20

摘要:

以“生态系统服务”为生态风险评价终点,通过量化外界压力源与生态系统服务的“压力响应”模式,建立基于生态系统水平的生态风险评价方法。该方法将生态系统整体作为分析对象,同时考虑了生态系统的各种组成要素及要素间的复杂关联作用。运用该方法评价了洞庭湖的生态风险,并对评价结果进行了分析。评价结果表明东洞庭湖的生态风险程度最高,西洞庭湖次之,南洞庭湖最低。造成洞庭湖生态风险的主要压力源为城市化、生活和气候变化;主要胁迫因子为有机污染物、营养物质和水流量变化。受影响较大的生态系统指标为生物多样性、河湖连通性和碳循环;营养循环价值、净化水质价值和生物多样性价值3项生态系统服务风险程度较高

Abstract:

Ecological risk assessment is an emerging area. It is developed with the change of environmental management goal and conception. In addition to the general meaning of risk, it is characterized by uncertainty, intrinsic value, objectivity and dynamic nature. Dongting Lake, the second largest freshwater lake in China, is an important storage lake in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, as well as a worldfamous scenic spot. It plays important roles in controlling flood, keeping balance between flow and sediment and maintaining species diversity. In recent years, the industry and agriculture development around the lake brought about a series of problems, such as water quality deterioration, aggravated eutrophication, sediment accumulation and increasing shortage of water resources. Ecological safety has been a horrible threat to the sustainable development of lake area. Therefore, it is considerably necessary to carry out ecological risk assessment of Dongting Lake. An ecosystembased ecological risk assessment method, which is different from traditional methods, was developed depending on the concepts of system ecology and complex system theory. The Ecosystem Services were selected as assessment endpoints and the “PressureResponse” relationship between external stress on ecosystem and Ecosystem Services was quantified. In this method, the whole ecosystem was taken as the object to analyze. It took account of not only the elements that make up the ecosystem, but also the complex relationship among them. For the ecological risk assessment based on single pressure source and risk receptor, the connection between the ecosystem elements followed a onetoone relationship. However, the ecological risk assessment based on whole ecosystem is the typical of multiple pressure sources, mutipaths, mutireceptors and mutiendpoints. Eventually, it was applied to the ecological risk assessment of Dongting Lake, and the assessment results were analyzed. The results showed that the degree of ecological risk is highest in East Dongting Lake while lowest in South Dongting Lake. The major pressure sources were urbanization, human life and climate change. Organic pollutant, nutritive material and water volume change of the upstream turned out to be the critical stress factors. The ecosystem indicators which were greatly affected were the biodiversity, riverlake connectivity and carbon cycle. The risk degree of nutrient cycle, water quality improvement and biodiversity were comparatively higher. The ecological risk assessment method proposed in this study considered risk resources comprehensively and objectively. Quantitative evaluation facilitated identification of the risk level. It provided basis for wetland management and ecological protection. Management of Dongting Lake should not only focus on the regular indices, like water quality and water quantity, but also biological indicators, such as species diversity. Since the three parts of Dongting Lake are different in landscape, hydrology and economic activity, different measures should be adopt to suit local conditions according ecological risk level

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[5] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[6] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[7] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[8] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[9] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .