基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505024

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (05): 892-898.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505024

•　生态环境　• 上一篇

基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例

廖炜, 高超, 刘汉生, 吴宜进

1. 华中师范大学博士后流动站, 湖北武汉 430070;
2. 湖北省水土保持监测中心, 湖北武汉 430071;
3. 华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2014-12-09 修回日期:2015-02-01 出版日期:2015-05-20
作者简介:廖炜(1976~),男,博士,主要研究农业政策与农村区域可持续发展.
基金资助:
2013湖北省科技支撑计划软科学研究项目(20130454)

RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FARMERS INVOLVED IN SOIL EROSION CONTROL BASED ON LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS ——A CASE OF WESTERN HUBEI PROVINCE

LIAO Wei, GAO Chao, LIU Han-sheng, WU Yi-jin

1. Postdoctoral Research Station, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. The Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Center of Hubei, Wuhan 430071;
3. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation, Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2014-12-09 Revised:2015-02-01 Online:2015-05-20
Contact: 吴宜进 E-mail:wuyijin@mail.ccnu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以鄂西地区利川市两类典型水土保持项目为例, 通过实地调查, 分析农户对水土保持工程的认知、行为特征及评价, 并采用Logistic模型分析了影响农户参与水土保持行为的因素。研究结果表明:农户对水土保持的参与认知度较高, 但是责任意识较差, 更多的寄于政府, 同时农户主要以参与水土保持工程建设的形式参与水土流失治理, 但在水土保持维护、组织、监督管理方面参与度较低;农户的教育水平越高, 其参与水土保持的程度越高;影响农户参与水土保持行为的因素主要是农户教育水平和水土保持外部环境;农户是否愿意参与水土保持与农户教育水平、政府采取的增收措施和工程补偿、水土保持工程进展呈显著性关系;农户主动参与水土保持工程与农户教育水平、是否检举破坏水土资源行为呈显著关系。结果对于揭示农户参与生态环境治理的行为机理有重要意义。

关键词: 农户参与式, 水土保持, Logistic 模型, 行为机理

Abstract: In this paper we analyze farmers' perception, behavior characteristics and evaluation to the project of soil and water conservation through field investigations. The analysis is based on a survey of farmer households in Lichuan, Hubei Province. We use logistic models to analyze the factors that affected farmers' participation behavior in the soil and water conservation projects. The results showed that farmer's perception to soil and water conservation projects was high, but their responsibility consciousness was poor. The farmers consider that the government has the main responsibility to conduct soil and water conservation. The farmers were mainly involved in controlling soil loss by participating in construction projects of soil and water conservation. However, the farmers participated little in the maintenance, organization and supervision of soil and water conservation. The education level and external environment are the mainly factors in farmers' willingness to participate into the project of soil and water conservation. The education level of farmers and the government's income measures and compensation have a significant impact on farmers' willingness to participate in soil and water conservation. The farmers' active behavior involved in soil and water and conservation has a significant relationship with the education level and the action of impeaching destruction of water and soil resources. The results had a significant importance in revealing the behavioral mechanism for farmers' willingness to participate in the governing of ecological environment.

Key words: farmer households' participatory, soil and water conservation, logistic model, behavior mechanism

中图分类号:

S157

廖炜, 高超, 刘汉生, 吴宜进. 基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 892-898.

LIAO Wei, GAO Chao, LIU Han-sheng, WU Yi-jin. RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FARMERS INVOLVED IN SOIL EROSION CONTROL BASED ON LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS ——A CASE OF WESTERN HUBEI PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(05): 892-898.

参考文献

[1] 李占斌, 朱冰冰, 李鹏, 等. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展[J].土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):802-809.
[2] 孙鸿烈.我国水土流失问题与防治对策[J].中国水利, 2011(6):16.
[3] 曾立雄, 肖文发, 黄志霖, 等.三峡库区不同退耕还林模式水土流失特征及其影响因子[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(1):146-152.
[4] 朱远达, 蔡强国, 张光远, 等.植物篱对土壤养分流失的控制机理研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2003, 12(4):345-351.
[5] 任文海.花岗岩红壤坡面工程措施的水土保持效应研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 2012.
[6] CHEN L, WEI W, FU B, et al.Soil and water conservation on the Loess Plateau in China:Review and perspective[J].Progress in Physical Geography, 2007, 31(4):389-403.
[7] 周虎, 吕贻忠, 杨志臣, 等.保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2007, 40(9):1973-1979.
[8] 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 易文明, 等.3 种典型生物措施对亚热带红壤丘陵茶园季节性干旱的防御效果[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(4):191-194.
[9] 谢颂华, 曾建玲, 杨洁, 等.南方红壤坡地不同耕作措施的水土保持效应[J].农业工程学报, 2010(9):81-86.
[10] 姜达炳, 樊丹, 甘小泽, 等.运用生物埂治理三峡库区坡耕地水土流失技术研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2):163-167.
[11] POTTER C.Processes of countryside change in low land England[J].Journal of Rural Studies, 1986, 2:187-195.
[12] CLARK H A J.Conservation advice and investment on farms:A study in three english counties[D].Norwich, East Anglia:University of East Anglia, 1989.
[13] GASSON R, POTTER C.Conservation through land diversion:A survey of farmers' attitudes[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988, 39:340-351.
[14] MBAGA-SEMGALAWE Z, FOLMER H.Household adoption behavior of improved soil conservation:The case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania[J].Land Use Policy, 2000, 17:321-336.
[15] CHAMBERS R.The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal [J].World development, 1994, 22(7):953-969.
[16] MUKHERJEE N.Participatory rural appraisal[M].Concept Publishing Company, 1997.
[17] 危丽, 杨先斌, 刘燕, 等.农户参与意愿与退耕还林政策的可持续性[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版, 2007, 12(6):29-35.
[18] 徐建英, 陈利顶, 吕一河, 等.基于参与性调查的退耕还林政策可持续性评价[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(11):3789-3795.
[19] 熊晓波, 梁剑辉, 董仁才, 等.参与式方法在小流域治理中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学, 2009(3):108-113.
[20] 胡玥琳.农户在小流域治理中的参与及相关因素分析——以马莲河流域为例[D].北京:中国农业大学硕士学位论文, 2007.
[21] 王瑷玲, 李占军, 张建国, 等.农民参与土地整理现状及政策建议[J].中国土地科学, 2009(5):47-50.
[22] 吴诗嫚, 杨钢桥, 汪文雄, 等.农户参与农地整理项目规划设计意愿的影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学, 2013(6):66-72.
[23] 翟文侠, 黄贤金.农户水土保持行为机理:研究进展与分析框架[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12(6):108-112.
[24] 陈胜可.SPSS统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2010.
[25] 王文玲.农户参与农地整理项目的影响因素研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文, 2012.
[26] 巨荣良.农户农业投入的行为特征及对策[J].经济问题, 1995(7):17-18.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例

RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FARMERS INVOLVED IN SOIL EROSION CONTROL BASED ON LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS ——A CASE OF WESTERN HUBEI PROVINCE

PDF (PC)

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

推荐阅读 10

[1]	杨渺, 谢强, 方自力, 刘孝富, 廖蔚宇, 王萍. “5·12”汶川地震极重灾区生态服务功能恢复总体评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 685-694.
[2]	徐宪立,张科利,刘雯,孔亚平, 陈济丁. 青藏公路路堤边坡水土保持措施及效益分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 619-619.
[3]	廖晓勇,罗承德,陈治谏,王海明. 三峡库区坡地果园间植草篱的水土保持效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 152-152.
[4]	张莉,何丙辉,李旭光,张小林. 云南省姚安县水土保持生态修复措施的效益研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 358-361.
[5]	严贤春 ,苏智先 ,彭正松,胥晓,唐晓平. 嘉陵江流域坡耕地“生态农业旅游”垂直景观模式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 333-336.
[6]	翟文侠,黄贤金. 应用DEA分析农户对退耕还林政策实施的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(2): 198-203.
[7]	马鹏红,黄贤金,于术桐,邬震. 江西省上饶县农户水土保持投资行为机理与实证模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 568-572.
[8]	陈良. 低山丘陵区水土保持治理与生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 370-374.