长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (8): 1260-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201708016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南森林生态功能区农户生态补偿支付意愿(WTP)影响因素及差异性分析

文清,尹宁,吕明,张皓东,王雨濛   

  1. 1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院,
    云南 昆明 650093;3.中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京 100872)
  • 出版日期:2017-08-20

FARM HOUSEHOLDS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY(WTP) FOR ECOLOGICAL #br# COMPENSATION: INFLUENTIAL FACTORS AND DISCREPANCIES IN THE#br#  CASE OF FORESTRY ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION AREAS IN YUNNAN PROVINCE

WEN Qing1,YIN Ning1, LV Ming1, ZHANG Haodong2, WANG Yumeng3   

  1. (1.College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technolgy, Kunming 650093, China;
    3. School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
  • Online:2017-08-20

摘要: 生态补偿是协调经济与资源环境和谐发展,化解生态环境与经济增长矛盾的有效手段,对推进生态文明建设意义深远。基于云南省5个州市农户调查数据,运用二元Probit模型,分析了云南森林 生态功能区农户生态补偿支付意愿的关键影响因素及其差异性。研究表明:大部分农户愿意为生态补偿付费,影响其支付意愿的主要因素是性别、年龄、是否兼业、家庭人口数、非农收入比重、生态补 偿重要性认知、森林经济效益是否比生态效益重要、生态环境满意度、政府是否对生态环境保护宣传、政策执行信任度以及信息获取难易程度;其中年龄、家庭农业劳动力人数和信息获取难易程度对专 业户支付意愿有重要影响,而家庭人口数、非农收入比重以及获得政府补偿的情况对兼业户支付意愿有重要影响;是否兼业、非农收入比重、对生态补偿了解程度以及信息获取难易程度对传统散户支付意愿影响较大;对政策执行的信任程度和产业发展程度对种植大户支付意愿有重要影响。基于此,提出了完善政府农村就业服务职能,鼓励农户非农就业、创业;完善生态功能区环境教育体系和宣传制度建设,强化农户环保意识;强化政府职责及其政策推广、执行力度,构建综合、完善的生态补偿宣传媒介;制定并实施差异化的生态补偿措施等具体对策建议。
关键词: 云南森林生态功能区;农户;生态补偿;支付意愿(WTP);影响因素;差异性

Abstract:

Ecological compensation is an effective method to coordinate the harmonious development of economy and resource environment and to resolve the contradiction between  ecological environment and economic growth. It has profound significance for promoting the construction of ecological civilization. Based on the survey data from farm households  in five cities in Yunnan Province, this research, using bivariate Probit model, analyzed key influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to pay(WTP) for ecological compensation  and their discrepancies in the forestry ecological function areas. The results showed that most farmers were willing to pay for ecological compensation; main factors that  affected their WTP included: gender, age, concurrent business, family population, the proportion of offfarm income, the cognition of importance of ecological compensation,  whether the economic benefit of forests is more important than its ecological benefit, their satisfaction with ecological environment, whether the government has advocated  ecological compensation as well as the degree of access to information. Age, household agricultural labor force and the degree of access to information had an importance  influence on farmers’ WTP; family population, the proportion of offfarm income and government compensation played a major role in influencing households’ WTP; four factors,  whether having concurrent business, the proportion of offfarm income, the degree of understanding of ecological compensation and access to information, had more significant  influence on WTP of traditional farmers; trust on policy implementation and industrial development situation have played an important role. Therefore, this research put forward  the following specific countermeasures: improving government service function in rural employment, encouraging farmers taking offfarm employment and entrepreneurship,  improving the construction of environmental education system in ecological function areas, promoting farmers’ environmental protection consciousness, strengthening government  responsibility and policy promotion and enforcement, building a comprehensive and ameliorated publicity medium of ecological compensation, as well as establishing and  implementation of differentiated ecological compensation measures.
Key words:forestry ecological function areas in Yunnan province; farm households; ecological compensation; willingness to pay; influential factor; discrepancy
 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张宝雷,周万村,马泽忠,. 三峡地区主要地类的自动提取方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 445 -449 .
[2] 梁 彬,李兆林. 西南岩溶石山地区岩溶水资源合理开发利用模式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 62 .
[3] 刘 伍,李满春,刘永学,毛 亮. 基于矢栅混合数据模型的土地适宜性评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 320 -324 .
[4] 燕乃玲,赵秀华,虞孝感. 长江源区生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 598 -602 .
[5] 梁守真,李仁东,朱超洪. 洞庭湖区生态服务价值变化区域差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 196 -200 .
[6] 白世彪,闾国年, 盛业华. GIS技术在三峡库区滑坡灾害研究中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 386 -391 .
[7] 赵翠薇,濮励杰. 城市化进程中的土地利用问题研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 169 -173 .
[8] 曲福田,赵海霞,朱德明,张效军. 江苏省环境污染及影响因素区域差异比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 86 -92 .
[9] 吴后建,王学雷,宁龙梅,芦云峰. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响——以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 185 -190 .
[10] 荆平 贾海峰. 流域地下水质评价的GIS与模型集成分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 248 -253 .