长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (06): 1333-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201806017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江上游重庆段径流变化归因分析

刘   波1,陈刘强1,2,周   森1,张天宇3   

  1. (1.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京 210098;2.中国电建集团北京勘测设计研究院有限公司,北京 100024;3.重庆气象中心,重庆 401147)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-20

Attribution Analysis of Runoff Change in Chongqing Section of Upper Yangtze River

LIU Bo 1, CHEN Liu-qiang1,2, ZHOU Sen1 , ZHANG Tian-yu3   

  1. (1.College of Hydrology and Water Resources,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;2.Powerchina Beijing Engineering Corporation Limited,Beijing 100024,China;3. Chongqing Climate Center, Chongqing 401147, China)
  • Online:2018-06-20

摘要: 近年来,受气候变化和人类活动的双重影响,长江上游重庆段的年径流量持续减少。首先利用MASH移动窗口滑动平均法分析重庆市长江干流寸滩、北碚和武隆3个主要水文站的径流变化特征,然后运用弹性系数法和回归分析法进行径流模拟,定量评价气候变化和人类活动对径流变化的贡献率。结果表明:(1)与基准期(1961~1990年)相比较,影响评价期(1991~2011年)气候变化和人类活动对3个水文站年径流减少量的贡献率分别约为25.2%~35.2%和64.8%~74.8%。(2)气候变化对月径流量的影响幅度有限,导致7月汛期径流量有一定程度的增加,8~10月的径流量普遍减少;人类活动对月径流量影响明显,导致7月份实际径流量减少,并进一步加剧了8~10月径流量减少的幅度。(3)两种方法都指示人类活动已经成为径流减少的重要原因。定量阐明径流变化的成因有助于科学制定应对措施,协调重庆市以及长江上游水资源开发利用。
关键词: 气候变化;人类活动;径流变化;定量归因;重庆

Abstract: In recent years, due to the dual impacts of climate change and human activities, the annual runoff of the Chongqing section of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River decreased significantly. In this paper, the MASH moving average method was used to analyze the runoff variation characteristics at three main hydrological stations in Chongqing :Cuntan, Beibei and Wulong. Further, the elastic coefficient method, together with the regression analysis method was adopted for runoff simulation, in an attempt to evaluate quantitatively the contribution rates of climate change and human activities on runoff change. The results showed that: (1) the contribution rates of climate change and human activities to the annual runoff reduction at all three hydrological stations were about 25.2%~35.2% and 64.8%~74.8%, respectively for the period of 1991-2011, compared to the reference period of 1961-1990. (2) The impact of climate change on monthly runoff is limited. Consequently, runoff in July increased to a certain extent, and runoff in August to October generally reduced. The influence of human activity was obvious, leading to a slight increase in runoff from December to April and runoff reduction from May to November. (3) Both methods indicated that human activities were the major factor causing runoff reduction. Quantitative assessment of the causes of runoff changes helps formulate scientific countermeasures and coordinate the development and utilization of water resources in the upper reaches of Yangtze river.
Key words:climate change; human activity; runoff change; quantitative attribution; Chongqing

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!