长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (08): 1998-2007.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201908023

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

江苏历史时期洪涝灾害时空分布特征

葛云健1,2,吴笑涵2   

  1. (1. 南京信息工程大学科学技术史研究院,江苏  南京 210044;2. 南京信息工程大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210044)
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-19

Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Historical Flood Disasters in Jiangsu Province

GE Yun-jian1,2, WU Xiao-han2   

  1. (1. The Institute of science and technology history, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044,China;
     2.The college of Geography Science, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044,China)

  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-19

摘要: 以江苏历史文献记录的洪涝灾害为研究对象,分析历史时期江苏地区洪涝灾害发生的时空差异性特征,探讨影响洪涝灾害时空差异性的原因。时间尺度上,历史时期江苏地区洪涝灾害明清时期多发,集中于夏秋季节,其影响因素有长时间异常降水、风暴潮以及厄尔尼诺事件等。空间尺度上,洪涝灾害多发生于太湖平原、里下河平原及沿江地区。唐宋时期,太湖平原、沿江地区是江苏省洪涝灾害最为集中的地区,明代以降苏北平原洪涝灾害更为集中,原因应该是宋代太湖平原人口激增,涸湖造田破坏了太湖东泄水道,明清后泄洪能力得到提升,长江口的演变则使得沿江地区潮灾逐渐减少,而里下河平原因为黄河夺淮入海,导致泥沙沉降,水流不畅,成为洪涝走廊。


Abstract: Based on the historical flood documents and records from Han dynasty to Qing dynasty, this paper studies the characteristics of frequency and spatial distribution of the historical flood in Jiangsu province, and then it discusses the influence factors which affect the frequency and distribution. The conclusions can be drawn as follows. Firstly, the flood in historical period almost happened in summer and autumn, so this paper thinks that the abnormal precipitation for a long time, tide disaster caused by tropical cyclone and El Nino events are the main reasons for flood in Jiangsu province. Secondly, the flood frequency in Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty was higher than any other times. Human activities is one of main reasons which caused the flood. Thirdly, the flood frequency in Lixiahe plain, Taihu plain and the region along the Yangtze River were higher than other areas. Because these three areas are all flatness plain that is lower than its surroundings. With the Yangzi Delta developing, the tide effect became weakened, so the flood in the region along the Yangtze River in Ming and Qing dynasty decreased. Before Yuan dynasty the Taihu plain was the area where the flood was serious but after Ming dynasty the most serious area had moved to Lixiahe plain. The reason for the change is the population in Taihu plain was exploded in Song dynasty, people changed the water area into farmland which caused the water area decreased and the flood cannot flow into the sea quickly, so the flood happened frequently. After Ming dynasty the rivers were dredged for several times, so the flood can flow efficiently. The Yellow river which carries numerous sands changed its route in 1128AD; it caused almost the sands settled down in Subei plain especial Lixiahe plain. This area became the flood corridor. 


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李丹, 郭生练, 洪兴骏, 郭靖. 汉江流域1960~2014年降雨极值时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1448 -1456 .
[2] 王淑平, 程和琴, 郑树伟, 徐韦, 陈钢, 赵军凯. 近期长江张家洲南水道强冲刷机理与趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2070 .
[3] 陶江平, 温静雅, 贺达, 侯轶群, 胡望斌, 曹晓红, 陈小娟, 陈凯麒, 常剑波.  

上行过鱼设施过鱼效果监测研究进展 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2270 -2282 .

[4] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[5] 王宇环, 靳 诚, 安鸿波, 刘 月. 基于低碳出行方式的南京市本地居民景点可达性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2443 -2452 .
[6] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .
[7] 陆砚池, 方世明. 均衡和效率双重视角下武汉市主城区公园绿地空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 68 -79 .
[8] 盖豪 颜廷武 何可 张俊飚. 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂三省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9] 孙 伟, 陈 雯, 刘崇刚, . 太湖流域水敏性与建设用地扩张的关联评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1575 -1582 .
[10] 程琳琳, 张俊飚, 何可. 网络嵌入与风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响分析——基于湖北省615个农户的调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1736 -1746 .