长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (10): 2331-2339.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201910006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

产业生态化水平的测度及其影响因素研究

张媛媛,袁奋强,刘东皇,陈利馥   

  1. (江苏理工学院商学院,江苏 常州 213001)
  • 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-11-05

Research on the Measurement of Industrial Ecologization Level and Its Influencing Factors

ZHANG Yuan-yuan,YUAN Fen-qiang, LIU Dong-huang, CHEN Li-fu   

  1.  (School of Business, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001,China)
  • Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-11-05

摘要: 近年来,产业生态化转型发展成为一个重要的热点问题。构建产业生态化水平评价指标体系,运用因子分析法对我国各省(直辖市、自治区)的产业生态化水平进行测度,并对此进行静态和动态分析,最后运用断尾回归方法找出影响我国产业生态化水平的主要因素。实证结果表明:我国产业生态化水平可以划分为领先区、发达区、中等区和落后区4大类型,各省区产业生态化水平虽都有所提高,但差距显著,影响产业生态化水平的主要因素有人均GDP、产业结构、环境污染治理投资额、R&D经费投入、工业固体废物产生量以及工业固体废物综合利用率。据此从产业系统内部和外部两个方面提出加快产业生态化转型发展的对策建议。

Abstract: In recent years, the transformation and upgrading of industrial ecologization have become a hot issue. This paper builds an evaluation index system of industrial ecologization level, and uses factor analysis method to measure the level of industrial ecologization in China’s each provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions). Then it analyses industrial ecologization level statically and dynamically. Finally, the truncated regression method is used to find out the main factors affecting the level of industrial ecologization in China. The empirical results show that all China’s provinces can be divided into four types based on the different industrial ecologization level , which include leading area, developed area, medium area and backward area. Although the industrial ecologization level of each province has improved, the gap is significant. And the main factors affecting the level of industrial ecologization are per capita GDP, industrial structure, investment in environmental pollution control, R&D expenditure, industrial solid waste production, and comprehensive utilization of industrial solid waste. Finally, the policy recommendations for accelerating the transformation and upgrading of industrial ecologization are proposed from the internal and external aspects of the industrial system.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭文献, 李 越, 王鸿翔, 查胡飞. 基于IHA-RVA法三峡水库下游河流生态水文情势评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2014 -2021 .
[2] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[3] 游博文, 张国安, 李一鸣, 李占海.  

30年来长江口北支及口外沉积特征及输移趋势 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2328 -2338 .

[4] 熊杰, 曾源, 朱亮, 郑朝菊, 高文文, 赵新峰, 赵旦, 吴炳方.  

25年三峡库区土地覆被变化及驱动力分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2368 -2378 .

[5] 黄炎忠 罗小锋 刘迪 余威震 唐林. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素——对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[6] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .
[7] 匡亮, 张鹏, 杨洪雨, 梁瑞峰, 王远铭, 李克锋. 梯级水库叠梁门分层取水水温改善效果的衰减[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1244 -1251 .
[8] 杨 倩, 刘目兴, 王苗苗, 张海林, 朱 强, 易 军. 武汉市典型绿地植被类型对表层土壤入渗和持水性能的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1324 -1333 .
[9] 洪步庭, 任平. 基于最小累积阻力模型的农村居民点用地生态适宜性评价——以都江堰市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1386 -1396 .
[10] 郭强, 孟元可, 樊龙凤, 叶许春. 基于IHA/RVA法的近年来鄱阳湖生态水位变异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1691 -1701 .