长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (4): 889-899.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202004010

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态修复后海三棱藨草湿地底栖生物多样性的年度变化及影响因子

钟胜财1,2,于克锋1,2,厉成伟1,2,吴铭轩1,2,武鹏玲1,2,何培民1,2,方淑波1,2*
  

  1. (1.上海海洋大学海洋生态与环境学院学院, 上海 201306;2.上海海洋大学上海高校水域环境生态工程研究中心,上海 201306)
  • 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-12

Variation and the Associated Affecting Factors of Benthic Biodiversity in Wetlands of Scirpus Mariqueter on Remediated Nanhui Coasts#br#

ZHONG Sheng-cai 1,2, YU Ke-feng 1,2,LI Cheng-wei 1,2,  WU Ming-xuan 1,2, WU  Peng-ling 1,2, HE Pei-min1,2, FANG Shu-bo1,2   

  1. (1. College of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;2. Shanghai Research Center of Universities for Water Environment & Ecology Engineering, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
  • Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-12

摘要: 摘  要:如何确定湿地生态修复过程中底栖生物群落结构的变化及其影响因子对湿地生态系统操纵及生态修复效果有重要意义。研究以南汇东滩海三棱藨草湿地为对象,研究底栖生物群落结构的年度季节变化及空间格局。共鉴定大型底栖动物30种,四季都存在的优势种有光滑狭口螺、拟沼螺、堇拟沼螺和中国绿螂。春季以中国绿螂为主要物种,优势度大于0.4;夏季以拟沼螺和堇拟沼螺为主,优势度分别大于0.1和0.2;秋冬季优势种数目比春夏季高,均为13种,但优势种值较春夏季为低,且均匀。多样性、丰富度指数(p<0.01)及均一性指数(p<0.05)在空间上均具有显著性差异,其中多样性指数最高到达2.53。根据近岸海域环境监测规范(HJ442-2008),南汇东滩湿地生境质量从极差、差改善成等级一般,生境质量提高明显。底栖生物群落结构影响因素的排序分析表明,春夏秋三季大型底栖动物群落结构特征与植被指数及高程相关,其次是有机碳、含水率、导电率和硝氮,而冬季大型底栖动物群落结构特征受含水率、导电率和硝氮的影响最大。

Abstract: Abstract:How the structure and the associated impacting factors of benthic organisms responding to ecological remediation project is a promising work of ecosystem manipulation for wetlands remediation. The annual temporal and spatial patterns of benthic community structure were studied in Scirpus mariqueter wetland on remediated Nanhui Coasts. A total of 30 species of macro benthos were identified in the study. The dominant species appeared in the whole four seasons are Stenothyra glabra, Assiminea, Assimineaviolacea, and Glauconomechinensis Gray. In spring, Glauconomechinensis Gray is the dominant species, and the dominance value is bigger than 0.4. In summer, Assimineasp and Assimineaviolacea Heude are the dominant species with the dominance value bigger 0.1 and 0.2 respectively. By a number of 13 in autumn and winter the dominant species number is higher than that in spring and summer but the dominance value is lower than that in spring and summer, and distributes spatial evenly. There is significant spatial difference for the indices of Shannon-Weiner Index (H’), species richness (p<0.01) and Pilou’s evenness index (p<0.05), with a highest H’ value of 2.53. According to the Specification for Offshore Environmental Monitoring (HJ442-2008) the habitat quality of Nanhui Coasts are upgraded from very poor and poor levels to general. The canonical correlation analysis (CCA) showed that in spring, summer and autumn the benthic organisms are significantly correlated with vegetation index and elevation, followed by organic carbon and water content, conductivity, and NO-3,while in winter the affecting factor is water content, electrical conductivity and NO-3.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘可群 |李仁东 |刘志雄 |刘 敏. 基于CI指数的湖北干旱及其变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1274 .
[2] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[3] 孔锋, 孙劭, 王一飞, 吕丽莉. 近56 a来中国东部地区雨涝事件时空演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1405 .
[4] 李 咪, 芮 旸, 王成新, 姬 宇, 李雅楠. 传统村落的空间分布及影响因素研究——以吴越文化区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1693 .
[5] 孙思瑞, 谢平, 陈柯兵, 桑燕芳, 董前进, 宁迈进, 周慧. 三峡水库蓄水期不同调度方案对洞庭湖出口水位的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1819 .
[6] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[7] 朱红波, 吴 熙, 袁 愿. 基于土地自然与经济双重属性的西部地区人口承载力测算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2684 -2696 .
[8] 班 璇, 朱碧莹, 舒 鹏, 杜 鸿, 吕晓蓉. 汉江流域气象水文变化趋势及驱动力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2817 -2829 .
[9] 吴晓冰 叶飞 姜毅 吴胜军 刘鸿 王川 张炜 王雨. 长江干流浮游细菌群落结构空间分布及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 文高辉, 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治中农户权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 623 -631 .