长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (5): 1163-1173.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202005011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

1998~2016年中国大气PM2.5污染浓度空间格局演化 ——基于339个城市的实证研究

刘曰庆1,孙希华1,孙宇祥2,李翠艳1   

  1. (1.山东师范大学地理与环境学院,“人地协调与绿色发展”山东省高校协同创新中心,山东 济南 250358; 2.南京大学工程管理学院,江苏 南京 210046)
  • 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-07-13

Evolution of Spatial Pattern of Atmospheric PM2.5 Pollution Concentration in China from 1998 to 2016:#br# Based on An Empirical Study of 339 Cities

LIU Yue-qing 1, SUN Xi-hua 1 , SUN Yu-xiang 2 , LI Cui-yan 1   

  1. (1.College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, “Human-earth Coordination and Green Development”, Shandong University Collaborative Innovation Center, Jinan 250358, China; 2.School of Managementand Engineering,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-07-13

摘要: 摘要: 近年来,与PM2.5相关的大气环境质量状况和改善问题一直是社会和公众关注的热点话题。通过选取中国339个地级市为研究对象,采用重心模型和局部空间自相关的研究方法,对中国339个城市大气PM2.5污染浓度空间格局演化进行实证分析。结果显示:(1)从重心分析来看,1998~2016年内的中国大气PM2.5污染浓度几何重心位于渭河平原附近以及中国东部和北方的大气PM2.5污染程度分别相对高于西部和南方地区。(2)从局部空间自相关分析来看,1998~2016年期间“高-高”类型的空间正相关的地区主要集中在华北地区、华中地区、华东地区、长江中下游沿岸城市及四川盆地;“低-低”类型的空间正相关的地区主要集中在西南和西北地区,也零星出现在东北和福建的部分城市中。最后对中国大气PM2.5污染空间格局进行初步成因探析。

Abstract: Abstract:In recent years, PM2.5 related air quality and improvement has been a hot topic of social and public concern.In this study, 339 prefecture-level cities in China were selected as the research objects, and the gravity center model and local spatial autocorrelation method were adopted to conduct an empirical analysis on the spatial pattern evolution of atmospheric PM2.5 pollution concentration in 339 cities in China.The results show that: (1) from the center of gravity analysis, the geometric center of gravity of atmospheric PM2.5 pollution concentration in China from 1998 to 2016 is located near Weihe Plain, and the degree of atmospheric PM2.5 pollution in eastern and northern China is relatively higher than that in western and southern regions respectively.(2) from the perspective of local spatial autocorrelation analysis, areas with positive spatial correlation of "high-high" type from 1998 to 2016 are mainly concentrated in North China, Central China, East China, cities along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and Sichuan Basin.The area with positive spatial correlation of “low-low” type is mainly concentrated in southwest and northwest, and also appears sporadically in some cities of northeast and Fujian.Finally, the spatial pattern of atmospheric PM2.5 pollution in China is preliminarily analyzed.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杜 耘, 陈 萍,Kieko SATO, Hajime AOE, 何报寅. 洪湖水环境现状及主导因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 481 -485 .
[2] 张玉龙| 夏小玲| 陈正洪, 党海山| 张全发. 基于开源GIS的长江流域晴日辐射反演[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1073 .
[3] 林孝松 |陈洪凯 |王先进 |唐红梅 |褚春超 |覃庆梅 |梁学战 |陈远川. 重庆市涪陵区G319公路洪灾风险评估研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(02): 210 .
[4] 邱蓓莉,徐长乐,刘洋,徐廷廷. 全球气候变化背景下上海市风暴潮灾害情景下脆弱性评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 149 .
[5] 于雪, 濮励杰, 许艳, 朱明. 1980~2010年江苏沿海城市土地利用变化及其与环境因子关系分析——以东台市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 537 -543 .
[6] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[7] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[8] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[9] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[10] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .