长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (3): 677-688.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

蓝绿空间冷岛效应时空变化及其影响因素 ——以苏州市为例

杨朝斌1* ,张亭1,胡长涛1,范吉康1,吉曹翔2,付喜娥3   

  1. (1.山东理工大学建筑工程学院,山东 淄博 255000;2.沈阳市气象局,辽宁 沈阳 110168;3.苏州科技大学建筑与城市规划学院,江苏 苏州 215009)
  • 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-04-07

Spatial-temporal Characteristics of the Cooling Island for Blue-Green Space and Its Driving Factors in Suzhou, China

YANG Chao-bin 1, ZHANG Ting 1, HU Chang-tao 1, FAN Ji-kang 1, CAO Ji-xiang 2,FU Xi-e 3   

  1. (1.School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China; 2. Shenyang Meteorological Bureau, Shenyang 110168, China;3. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China)
  • Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-04-07

摘要: 水体和植被组成的“蓝绿空间”能够有效减缓城市热岛效应,探究其时空变化特征和影响因素对于改善城市环境和促进区域绿色低碳发展具有重要意义。以2004、2010和2014年三期Landsat遥感影像为数据源反演地表温度表征热环境,构建冷岛效应强度和冷岛指数定量分析苏州市蓝绿空间降温作用的时空变化特征,利用分类统计、剖面趋势法和线性拟合等方法分析蓝绿空间面积、土地利用变化和其它社会经济因素对冷岛效应的时空影响,结论如下:(1)2004~2014年苏州市冷岛效应面积不断减小,减少比例高达24.04%;空间上看,苏州北部和东部冷岛区域减少尤为明显,南部湖泊为主的地区变化相对较小。(2)从冷岛强度数值大小看,蓝绿空间的降温能力不断增强,2004、2010和2014年的冷岛强度分别为6.3℃、7.1℃和9.6℃;但考虑到其面积变化,苏州市蓝绿空间冷岛效应对于热环境的调节作用呈现出减弱趋势。(3)水体构成的“蓝色空间”降温能力(10.5℃)远大于植被“绿色空间”的冷岛强度(4.8℃);流动河渠的冷岛强度要明显高于静止的湖泊。(4)土地利用变化:尤其城市扩张侵占大量水田为影响苏州市冷岛效应时空变化的重要驱动因素,反观苏州市湖泊总面积在研究时间范围内有小幅增长,推断出政府决策者对于蓝绿空间类型的优先保护程度。

Abstract: The blue-green space, consisting of water and vegetation, can effectively mitigate the negative influence produced by urban heat island, which will help improve the urban thermal environment and promote the sustainable development. In this study,Landsat images collected from 2004, 2010 and 2014 were used to retrieve land surface temperature to characterize the thermal environment. The cooling island intensity and index were constructed to explore the spatial-temporal characteristics of the cooling island produced by blue-green space. The profile analysis and statistic method were employed to study the impact of the total area of blue green space, land use and land cover changes and social economy factors on the cooling island. The results showed that: from 2004 to 2014, the area of cooling island zone had decreased by 24.04%, which were mainly located at the north and east part in Suzhou. However, the cooling island intensity of the blue-green space were 6.3℃,7.1℃, and 9.6℃ in 2004, 2010 and 2014, respectively, which showed an increasing trend. However, when taking the area changes of blue green space into account, the cooling effect produced by blue and green space has decreased because of urbanization. The cooling effect of blue space (10.5℃) consisting of water was much higher than that of green space (4.8℃) which was consisted of vegetation, and the cooling effect of flowing river was stronger than still lakes. The changes of land use and land cover could make big differences on the spatial pattern of the cooling island. The loss of paddy land was the dominant factor for the expansion of urban area, resulting in the loss of cooling island zone at the same time. However, the total area of lakes in Suzhou has increased a little during 2004 to 2010, which reflected the choice of protection for different blue and green spaces by decision makers.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 兰 | 陈正洪 | 刘 敏 | 史瑞琴 | 邓 雯. 2008年低温雨雪冰冻对武汉城市公共交通的影响评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1400 .
[2] 张亚男, 甘义群, 李小倩, 刘运德, 于凯, 张彬. 2013年长江丰水期河水化学特征及控制因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 645 -654 .
[3] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[4] 吴殿鸣, 邵大伟. 基于最佳尺度的城市扩张特征研究——以苏州中心城区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1937 -1946 .
[5] 沈雪, 张露, 张俊飚, 骆兰翎. 稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[6] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[7] 曾 刚, 杨舒婷, 王丰龙, . 长江经济带城市协同发展能力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2641 -2650 .
[8] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[9] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[10] 梁志会, 张露, 张俊飚, Jorge Ruiz Menjivar, 刘勇. 小农发展气候智慧型农业的效率与成本改进:倡导农地流转还是发展社会服务?[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1164 -1175 .