长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (8): 1839-1847.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202108006

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江中下游浮游植物群落结构、功能群特征及水质评价

杜红春1,王晓宁1,吴  虎1,范泽宇1,侯  杰1,2,何绪刚1,2*   

  1. (1.华中农业大学水产学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.长江经济带大宗水生生物产业绿色发展教育部工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-09-06

Community Structure and Functional Groups of Phytoplankton and Water Quality Evaluation in the Middle and Lower Hanjiang River

DU Hong-chun 1, WANG Xiao-ning 1, WU Hu 1, FAN Ze-yu 1, HOU Jie 1,2, HE Xu-gang 1,2   

  1. (1.College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2.Engineering Research Center of Green development for Conventional Aquatic Biological Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, Ministry of Education,Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-09-06

摘要: 为了解汉江中下游浮游植物群落结构和功能群特征,于2017年7月、11月和2018年5月对汉江中下游6个断面进行采样,并以此对汉江中下游水质进行评价。结果显示:共镜检出浮游植物7门75属145种,其中硅藻门为主要优势种;浮游植物密度均值为7.57×106 cell/L,变化范围为1.51×105~4.33×107 cell/L;生物量均值为4.849 5 mg/L,变化范围为0.088 7~17.259 3 mg/L;共划分出23个不同的浮游植物功能群,其中相对生物量大于10%的功能群有2种,分别是P和D功能群;根据浮游植物污染指示种、Shannon-Wiener指数和Qr指数综合评价汉江中下游水质整体处于轻-中污染状态,夏季水质差于春季和秋季。

Abstract: The phytoplankton sampling was conducted seasonally in the middle and lower Hanjiang River from July 2017 to May 2018. Community structure and the functional groups of phytoplankton were analyzed and water quality evaluated accroding to the phytoplankton functional group classification. A tatal of 145 phytoplankton species, belonging to 75 genera and 7 phyla, were identified during the study period. The dominant species of phytoplankton were species of Bacillariophyta. The density of phytoplankton ranged from 1.51×105 to 4.33×107 ind/L (7.57×106 ind/L in average). The biomass of phytoplankton ranged from 0.088 7 to 17.259 3 mg/L (4.849 5 mg/L in average). Twenty-three different phytoplankton functional groups were constructed in the middle and lower Hanjiang River, and the relative biomass of two functional groups, namely functional groups P and D, was more than 10%. The water quality was comprehensively evaluated by phytoplankton saprobie indicator, Shannon-wiener index and Qr value. Our results indicated that the water quality in the middle and lower Hanjiang River was slightly-moderately polluted. The water quality in summer was worse than in spring and summer.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 栾青杉, 孙军. 2005年秋季长江口及其邻近水域浮游植物群集[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 202 .
[2] 刘毅, 陶勇, 万开元, 张过师, 陈树森, 陈防. 丹江口库区坡耕地柑桔园不同覆盖方式下地表径流氮磷流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1340 .
[3] 邓晓军| 韩龙飞| 杨明楠| 于志慧| 张媛. 城市水足迹对比分析——以上海和重庆为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 189 .
[4] 王晓辉,杨 晨. 基于GIS和地统计学的淮南矿区土壤重金属含量与空间分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 60 .
[5] 胡金晓1,2,朱明1,2,濮励杰1,2,蔡芳芳1,2. 交通道路对区域土地利用变化的影响研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 111 .
[6] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 田雨 周宝同 付伟 王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[9] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[10] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .