长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (2): 461-471.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202202019

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带耕地压力时空演变规律与趋势

王艳,张安录


  

  1. (华中农业大学公共管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070)

  • 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-03-21

Temporal and Spatial Evolution and Trend of Cultivated Land Pressure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

WANG Yan, ZHANG An-lu    

  1. (College of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-03-21

摘要:  长江经济带作为我国经济发展核心区和重要农业生产基地,在快速城镇化和工业化进程中,耕地资源承载负荷大、压力显著,面临巨大风险和挑战。基于标准耕地系数修正的压力指数模型分析长江经济带1987~2017年耕地资源情况,多时空尺度反映变化态势,并利用预测模型测算耕地压力未来变化趋势。结果表明:(1)长江经济带耕地压力时间序列呈现倒“V”型分布,2003年达到压力峰值后缓慢下降;空间格局呈现出“整体稳定、局部动荡”基本态势,压力重心向东迁移;(2)区域耕地压力异质性明显,长江上游主要受恶劣的耕种条件和频发的自然灾害影响,长江下游主要受快速城镇化影响,分布格局上表现出“下游急速上升,中游稳步下降,上游波动起伏”的局面;(3)未来5年(十四五期间)长江经济带耕地压力并未得到缓解,且有逐年增长的势头,对大保护战略构成一定挑战,需要引起有关决策部门重视。

Abstract: As the core area of China's economic development and an important agricultural production base, the Yangtze River Economic Belt is confronted with great risks and challenges in the process of rapid urbanization and industrialization, with large load and significant pressure of cultivated land resources. Based on the cultivated land pressure index model modified by the standard cultivated land coefficient, this paper analyzes the cultivated land resources situation of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1987 to 2017, reflects the changing trend of the cultivated land pressure with multiple spatial and temporal scales, and calculates the future changing trend of the cultivated land pressure by using the prediction model.The results show that :(1) The time series of cultivated land pressure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt presents an inverted "V" type distribution, and decreases slowly after reaching the peak pressure in 2003; The spatial pattern presents the basic situation of "overall stability and local turbulence", and the pressure center of gravity moves to the east. (2) The regional cultivated land pressure is obviously heterogeneous. The upper reaches of the Yangtze River are mainly affected by poor farming conditions and frequent natural disasters, while the lower reaches of the Yangtze River are mainly affected by rapid urbanization. The distribution pattern shows the situation of "rapid rise in the lower reaches, steady decline in the middle reaches and fluctuation in the upper reaches". (3) During the 14th five-year Plan period, the cultivated land pressure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt has not been alleviated, and has a momentum of increasing year by year, which poses a certain challenge to the great protection strategy and needs to be taken seriously by relevant decision-making departments.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[5] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[6] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[7] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[8] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[9] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .