长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (6): 1354-1369.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202206016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

沱江流域污染负荷与生态系统服务价值空间关系解析研究

樊敏1,肖宇婷1,姚婧1,谌书1*,刘云峰2,陈雯2,邓粤2,王美玲2
  

  1. (1. 西南科技大学环境与资源学院,四川 绵阳 621010;2. 成都市沱江流域投资发展集团有限公司,四川 成都 610000)
  • 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-07-11

Spatial Relationships Between Pollution Loadsand Ecosystem Services Valuesin the Tuojiang River Watershed

FAN Min1,XIAO YU-ting1, YAO Jing1, CHEN Shu1, LIU Yun-feng2, CHEN Wen2, DENG Yue2, WANG Mei-ling2   

  1. (1. School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010,China;2. Chengdu Tuojiang River Basin Investment Development Group Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610000, China)
  • Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-07-11

摘要: 沱江流域是四川盆地中部人类与水土资源发生相互作用最为频繁的区域,近年来,流域人口增长迅速、经济发展快速、城镇化进程加快,导致该区域水环境污染日益严重和生态系统服务功能退化。采用单位土地利用类型面积生态系统服务价值赋值法和排污系数法,分别对沱江流域28个区县的生态系统服务价值和污染负荷进行了估算,揭示了两者在空间上的匹配关系,以期为流域水环境管理和生态保护设提供建议。结果表明:(1)沱江流域污染物排放量中 COD 排放最多,TP排放最少,COD、NH3-N、TN和TP污染负荷的最大值分别为71 067.51、11 108.76、21 320.08和3 073.99 t。流域污染负荷的分布具有较大的空间异质性,上游污染负荷较小,中游污染负荷较大,下游污染负荷相对于中游较低。(2)流域4种类型生态系统服务价值的空间分布差异显著,上游具有较大的供给型、调节型、支持型和文化型生态系统服务价值,而总生态系统服务价值的空间分布格局与支持型生态系统服务的空间分布格局极为相似。(3)沱江流域生态系统服务与污染负荷的空间匹配性差异显著,其差异性较大值出现在流域的中下游,需要构建合理的生态补偿机制和有效的污染负荷削减方案,改善流域水环境和生态系统服务功能。因此,流域污染负荷和生态系统服务价值的空间关系研究,不仅加深了生态系统服务与污染负荷间关系的理解,而且丰富了流域水环境生态管理的研究案例,也为流域水环境质量管理和生态建设提供了依据。

Abstract: The Tuojiang River watershed is located in the middle of Sichuan Basin where the human and water environment frequently interact with each other. In recent years, the water environment pollution and degradation of ecosystem services are becoming more and more seriousowing to rapid population growth, fast economic development and accelerated urbanization process lead to in this watershed. This study adopted the assignment of ecosystem service value per unit land use area and export coefficient as approaches, then estimated the ecosystem service values and pollution loads of 28 counties in Tuojiang River watershed, and finally revealed their matching relationships from spatial scale toto provide suggestions for water environmental management and ecological conservation. The results included following aspects:(1)Comparing individual pollutant emitted amounts, the COD emission was largest, TP emission was lowest, and the maximum values of COD, NH3-N, TN and TP pollution loads were 71 067.51 t, 111 08.76t, 21 320.08 t and 3 073.99 t, respectively. The distribution of pollution load had great spatial heterogeneity in this study watershed. The pollution load in the upstream was smaller, the pollution load in the middle reaches was larger, and the pollution load in the downstream was lower than that in the middle reaches.(2)The spatial differentiation of the four types of ecosystem service values in the basin was obvious. The larger ecosystem service values of provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural ecosystem services values occurred in upstream of study watershed. The spatial distribution pattern of total ecosystem service value was very similar to that of supporting ecosystem service.(3)The spatial differentiation of the matching relationship between ecosystem service value and pollution load in Tuojiang River watershedwas also obvious.The higher values of spatial differentiation appeared in the middle and downstream of watershed. Therefore, it is necessary to build a reasonable ecological compensation mechanism and effective pollution load reduction strategies to improve the water environment and ecosystem service functions in these districts.The study on spatialrelationships between pollution loads and ecosystem services values not only deepens the understanding of the relationship between ecosystem services and pollution loads, but also enriches the research case of water environmental management in the watershed. It provide the basis of water environmental management and ecological construction. 


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 袁博, 郭梦京, 周孝德, 郑兴. 气候变化及人类活动对河流溶解性有机质(DOM)影响的研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1440 .
[2] 张路路, 郑新奇, 蔡玉梅.  基于投影寻踪模型的湖南省土地多功能时空演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1754 .
[3] 廖炜, 李璐, 杨伟, 吴宜进. 城镇化过程中的流域面源污染时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1776 .
[4] 奚世军 安裕伦 李阳兵 蔡沛伶 李瑞 龙立美 陈啟英. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估 ——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 张亚飞 廖和平 李义龙. 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 秦立 吴起鑫. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 刘晋高, 诸葛亦斯, 刘德富, 张佳磊, 马骏, 余晓.  

防控三峡水库支流水华的生态约束型优化调度 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2379 .

[8] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505 -2517 .
[9] 周彦锋, 吕大伟, 葛 优, 王晨赫, 刘剑羽, 张 丽, 尤 洋, . 淀山湖河蚬翘嘴红鲌国家级水产种质资源保护区翘嘴鲌产卵场现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2733 -2739 .
[10] 袁凯华, 张 苗, 甘臣林, 陈银蓉, 朱庆莹, 杨慧琳. 基于碳减排目标的省域碳生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 21 -29 .