长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (8): 1866-1872.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202208020

• 创刊三十周年纪念专辑 • 上一篇    

红壤和紫色土坡面产流产沙特征对比

刘晓路1,2,3,徐文玉4*,王可1,2,3,吴宜进1   

  1. (1.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 40079;2.长江水利委员会长江科学院,湖北 武汉 430010;3.水利部山洪地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心,湖北 武汉 430010;4.湖北省水利水电科学研究院,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-09-16

Comparison of Runoffs and Sediment Yields on Slope Surfaces Between Red Soil and Purple Soil

LIU Xiao-lu1,2,3, XU Wen-yu4, WANG Ke1,2,3, WU Yi-jin1   

  1. (1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences of Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079,China; 
    2.Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010,China; 3.Research Center on 
    Mountain Torrent & Geologic Disaster Prevention, Ministry of Water Resources, Wuhan 430010,China;
    4.Hubei Water Resources Research Institute, Wuhan 430070,China)
  • Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-09-16

摘要: 利用人工模拟降雨实验,比较了长江中上游地区两种代表性土壤(红壤和紫色土)的产流产沙特征,从而为统筹配置水土保持措施,控制长江流域水土流失提供本底数据支撑。人工模拟实验降雨历时为60 min,设置小中大三组雨强(0.8、1.1、1.4 mm/min)和四组坡度(10°、15°、20°、25°)。结果表明:(1)两种土壤的初损历时都随雨强的增大而减小,红壤的初损历时小于紫色土;(2)在相同雨强和坡度情况下,红壤的径流深大于紫色土,且红壤先达到稳定状态;(3)小雨强时红壤的侵蚀速率大于紫色土,但中大雨强时情况与之相反。该结果主要是由于两种土壤机械组成差异所造成的。由于红壤黏粒含量较高,在雨强较小时,雨水在红壤坡面入渗少产流量大,因此红壤坡面遭受更强的细沟间侵蚀,致使红壤的侵蚀速率更大。当雨强增大后,红壤与紫色土坡面均出现较大产流,但由于紫色土粉粒含量较高,致使紫色土坡面出现细沟侵蚀,从而进一步加剧了紫色土坡面的侵蚀,导致紫色土坡面侵蚀速率反超红壤坡面。

Abstract: Red soil and purple soil are widely distributed in the upper and middle area of Changjiang River basin. In this study, the runoff and sediment yield characteristics of the two types of soil are compared by simulated rainfall experiments. The results of this study are able to provide a background database for supporting a coordinated deployment of control measures to alleviate water and soil loss along the Changjiang River. In the simulated rainfall experiments, the rainfall duration was set to 60 min while three rainfall intensities (0.8 mm/min, 1.1 mm/min, 1.4 mm/min) and four slope gradients (10°, 15°, 20°, 25°) were included as the variables for both types of soil. The results show that: (1) the initial erosion time of two types soil were shortened by the increasing rainfall intensities, and the initial erosion time of red soil was shorter than that of purple soil; (2) under the same rainfall intensities and slope gradients, the runoff depths were deeper and less time was needed to reach the runoff steady stage in the red soil cases compared with that of purple soil cases; (3) the erosion rate of red soil under a lower rainfall intensity was larger than that of purple soil while the situation was reversed under a higher rainfall intensity. These may result from the difference in the soil texture of the two types of soil .As the content of clayey particles are higher in red soil, most of the water ran off from the slope surface, which was formed by red soil, rather than infiltrates into the slope under the light rainfall. Therefore, the slopes formed by red soil suffered more intensive inter-rill erosion, inducing higher erosion rates than those of purple soil. However, the situation was reversed when under the heavy rainfall. As most of water also ran off from slopes surfaces formed by purple soil and the silty particle content is higher in purple soil, the type of erosion on the purple soil slope was changed from inter-rill erosion to rill erosion, accelerating the soil erosion rates to higher levels than those of red soil.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 沈雪, 张露, 张俊飚, 骆兰翎. 稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[3] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[4] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[5] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[6] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .
[7] 张亚飞, 廖和平, 李义龙, . 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[8] 李景保, 于丹丹, 张瑞, 杨波, 代稳, 何蒙, 徐志. 近61年来长江荆南三口水系连通性演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1214 -1224 .
[9] 盛叶子, 曾蒙秀, 彭海军, 李 雪, 高 洋, 朱丽东, 李凤全, 胡忠行, 苏 婕, 余奕泓. 1470~1949年贵州地区干湿序列的重建及其影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1354 -1364 .
[10] 潘方杰, 王宏志, 王璐瑶, 李仁东, 邱娟. 平原湖区钉螺分异规律及孳生环境特征研究——以湖北公安县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(08): 1965 -1976 .