长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (4): 729-738.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202304005

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

巢湖湖滨带不同土地类型土壤DOM光谱研究

申慧彦1, 2, 王嘉富1, 2, 曹承泽1, 2, 王靖军1, 2, 李卫华1, 2, 张  瑾1, 2   

  1. (1. 安徽建筑大学环境与能源工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230601;2. 环境污染控制与废弃物资源化利用安徽省重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230601)
  • 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-27

Study on DOM Spectra of Different Soil Types in Chaohu Lakeside Zone

SHEN Hui-yan1, 2, WANG Jia-fu1, 2, CAO Cheng-ze1, 2, WANG Jing-jun1, 2, LI Wei-hua1, 2, ZHANG Jin1, 2   

  1. (1.School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China;2.Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Hefei 230601, China)
  • Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-27

摘要: 以巢湖北部湖滨带为研究区域,采集潮间带、植物湿地、林地和田地4种类型土地0~20cm表层土壤,利用紫外吸收光谱、三维荧光光谱结合平行因子法探讨不同土地类型土壤溶解性有机质(DOM)光谱特征。结果表明巢湖北部湖滨带4种土地类型土壤溶解性有机碳(DOC)与有色溶解性有机质(CDOM)、荧光溶解性有机质(FDOM)具有显著正相关关系(P<0.05),CDOM和FDOM也呈显著正相关关系(P<0.05);相较于其他3种类型土壤,植物湿地土壤DOC、CDOM和FDOM含量均为最高。紫外吸收光谱参数共同表明林地和田地土壤DOM分子量相对较大、疏水组分较高、芳香化程度较强。4种类型土壤光谱斜率比值(SR)均小于0.70,荧光指数(FI)在1.40~1.90之间,表明土壤腐殖化程度较好,DOM具有内源与外源双重特征,以外源为主。植物湿地土壤自生源指数(BIX)和Fn(280)高于其他3种类型土地,且腐殖化指数(HIX)最低,表明自生源和类蛋白的组分高于其他3种土地类型,腐殖化程度最低。4种类型土地土壤DOM由类富里酸(Ex/Em=245, 320/420 nm)、类色氨酸(Ex/Em=280/340 nm)、类腐殖酸(Ex/Em=275, 375/455 nm)3种荧光组分组成,类富里酸组分对DOM贡献率最高(46%~62%),植物湿地土壤DOM类色氨酸占比高于其他土壤类型。研究结果为揭示巢湖湖滨带不同土地类型土壤DOM的组成、结构和来源提供基础数据,为巢湖水生环境的保护提供科学依据。

Abstract: Taking the lakeside zone in the north of Chaohu Lake as the research area, the 0~20cm surface soil of the intertidal zone, plant wetland, forest land and field were collected. The soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) was analyzed by UV absorption spectrum and three-dimensional fluorescence spectrum combined with parallel factors to explore the spectral characteristics of DOM in different land types. The results showed that the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of the four land types in the northern lakeside zone of Chaohu Lake had a significantly positive correlation with the colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) and the fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) (p<0.05), and the CDOM and FDOM also had a significantly positive correlation (p<0.05). Compared with the other three types of soil, the contents of DOC, CDOM and FDOM in plant wetland soil were the highest. The UV absorption spectrum parameters showed that the relative molecular weight, hydrophobic components and aromatization degree of DOM in field and forest soil were higher. The spectral slope ratio (SR) of the four types of soil was less than 0.70, and the fluorescence index (FI) was between 1.40 and 1.90, indicating that the degree of soil humus in the lakeside zone was better. DOM had dual characteristics of endogenous and exogenous, and the exogenous ones were the main sources. The biotic index (BIX) and Fn(280) of plant wetland soil were higher than those of the other three land types, and the humification index (HIX) was the lowest, indicating that the biogenic and protein-like components were higher than the other three land types, and the humification degree was the lowest. The four types of soil DOM were composed of three fluorescent components:fulvic-like acid(Ex/Em=245,320/420 nm),tryptophan-like(Ex/Em=280/340 nm),humic-like acid (Ex/Em=275,375/455 nm).The contribution rate of fulvic-like acid components up to DOM was 46~62%, and the proportion of tryptophan-like in DOM of plant wetland soil was higher than that of other soil types. The results provide basic data for revealing the composition, structure and source of soil DOM of different land types in Chaohu lakeside, and provide scientific basis for the protection of aquatic environment in Chaohu Lake.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 奚世军 安裕伦 李阳兵 蔡沛伶 李瑞 龙立美 陈啟英. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估 ——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 袁凯华, 张 苗, 甘臣林, 陈银蓉, 朱庆莹, 杨慧琳. 基于碳减排目标的省域碳生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 21 -29 .
[9] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .