长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (9): 1859-1871.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202309008

• 长江经济带高质量发展(专栏) • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带共享发展水平时空差异分析

邵姝遥1,2,彭  棋1,2,苏伟忠1*   

  1. (1.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所流域地理学重点实验室,江苏 南京210008;2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京100049)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-22

Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Shared Development Level in Yangtze River Economic Belt

SHAO Shu-yao1,2 ,PENG Qi1,2,SU Wei-zhong1   

  1. (1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-22

摘要: 我国经济已由高速增长阶段向高质量发展阶段转型,共享发展是高质量发展的根本目的。在构建共享发展评价指标体系基础上,定量评估2010~2020年长江经济带共享发展水平时空变化机制。结果表明:目前长江经济带共享发展水平与城市规模等级具有一致性,形成下游以沪宁杭为核心的高等集聚区且辐射带动强,中上游分别形成武汉与成都两个极值中心但辐射带动弱;2010~2020年共享发展水平总体略有提升但地域差异大,其中一类中心城市稳中有升,二类中心城市与地区中心城市提升明显,且后者内部升降差异大,一般城市降幅突出;空间上长三角地区及中游部分地区提升显著,而中游及上游一般城市降幅明显,上游与下游差距扩大;文化资源、社会保障与就业水平是差异形成的主要因素。研究结果揭示不同地市共享发展优势与短板,为制定长江经济带高质量发展差异化举措提供依据。

Abstract: China’s economy has shifted from high-speed growth to high-quality development, and the shared development has become the fundamental objective. Based on the evaluation index system of prefectural units and shared development, this study quantitatively evaluates the differences and changes in shared development levels in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2010 to 2020. The results show that: the shared development levels of different scale grade cities decreased in order. The downstream area forms a high agglomeration area with Shanghai, Nanjing, and Hangzhou as the core, with strong radiation-driven effects. In the upstream and midstream areas, Wuhan and Chengdu form two extreme value centers, but with weak radiation-driven effects. From 2010 to 2020, the first class of central cities is steadily increasing in general, the second class of central cities and regional central cities are significantly elevated, while the regional central cities differ between uplift and subsidence, and other cities are lowering significantly. The Yangtze River Delta region and part of the midstream areas are significantly growing, and other cities of the upstream and midstream areas are significant decreasing. The gap between downstream and upstream is widening. The difference in cultural resources is the most obvious factor, followed by the fiscal expenditure on social security and employment. The economically developed areas enjoy a high level of shared development in compulsory education, culture, social security, and employment, while the economically backward areas have the advantages in health and medical community and environmental greening. The results show the advantages and disadvantages of the sharing development level of different scale-grade cities, and provide a basis for the formulation of differentiated policies for the high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[4] 马剑锋, 佟金萍, 王慧敏, 王 圣. 长江经济带农业用水全局技术效率的空间效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2757 -2765 .
[5] 谢贤鑫 陈美球 . 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析—基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[7] 邢璐平, 方斌, 向梦杰, . 基于GWR模型的江苏省耕地集约利用水平时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 376 -386 .
[8] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[9] 刘宇, 赵亮, . 基于过程—效应—功能—服务级联机制的森林减沙服务传输研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 883 -892 .
[10] 钟业喜, 郭卫东, 毛炜圣, 王晓静, 冯兴华. 闽新轴带城市铁路网络及可达性演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1015 -1024 .