长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (9): 1942-1952.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202409009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

大运河文化带(江浙段)聚落文化遗产空间分异及影响因素研究

周丙锋1,孟永泰1,李小娟1,刘晟2
  


  1. (1.首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京,100048;2.安徽大学商学院,安徽 合肥 230601)
  • 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-23

A Study on Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Settlement Cultural Heritage along Jiangsu and Zhejiang Sections of the Grand Canal Cultural Belt

ZHOU Bing-feng1,MENG Yong-tai1,LI Xiao-juan1,LIU Sheng2   

  1. (1.College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048,China; 
    2. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601,China)
  • Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-23

摘要: 以江浙段大运河文化带421处聚落文化遗产为研究对象,基于“城镇-村落-历史街区地段”聚落层次分布框架,综合运用GIS空间分析、地理探测器等方法对比分析不同层次聚落文化遗产的空间分布特征,并从自然地理、人文社会和运河流域3个维度分析不同因素对其影响程度。研究表明:(1)聚落整体呈聚集性分布,且聚落规模越小聚集性越显著,但在市域范围存在随机或离散分布且聚落在各市分布不均衡;(2)聚落整体密度高值区位于杭州、宁波以及太湖流域一带,各类聚落密度高值区存在差异;(3)聚落空间分布特征是多重因素共同作用的结果,其中大运河影响程度最大。在自然地理及运河流域因素影响下,整体聚落存在低海拔、低坡度、邻运河指向性,无明显坡向指向性;在人文社会因素影响下,整体聚落偏向交通可达性较低、人口较少、远离市中心且经济发展相对较慢的地区。各类聚落在不同因素影响下存在差异;(4)浙东运河文化带因所处地势不同,村落聚落具有近山指向性,但近水比近山更易形成大规模聚落。由此提出相关建议,为大运河文化带聚落文化遗产空间分布研究做进一步完善,为大运河文化的保护、利用和传承提供科学参考和现实依据。


Abstract: Based on the settlement hierarchy distribution framework of "town-village-historical block", we comprehensively used GIS spatial analysis and geographical detector methods to compare and analyze the spatial characteristics of 421 settlements at different levels in the Grand Canal cultural belt in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Province. We also analyzed the influencing factors from three dimensions of natural geography, human society and canal basin. The results showed that: (1) The distribution of settlements cultural heritage was clustered on the whole, and the smaller the scale of the settlements, the more significant the aggregation of the settlements. However, there was a random or discrete distribution in the city area and the distribution of settlements in each city was uneven. (2) The high-density areas of settlements cultural heritage were located in Hangzhou, Ningbo and Tai Lake area of Suzhou, and there were differences among different types of settlements density areas. (3) The spatial distribution characteristics of settlements cultural heritage were the result of multiple factors, among which the Grand Canal had the greatest influence on the spatial distribution characteristics of settlements. Under the influence of physical geography and canal basin, the overall settlements had low altitude directivity, low slope directivity and adjacent canal directivity, but no obvious exposure directivity. Under the influence of human society factors, the overall settlements tended to be in areas with low traffic accessibility, small population, far away from the city center, and relatively slow economic development. There were differences in various settlements under different influences. (4) Due to the different terrains in the eastern Zhejiang Canal cultural belt, village settlements demonstrated a mountain-oriented, but large-scale settlements were more likely to form near water, rather than near mountain. Based on this, relevant suggestions were put forward to further improve the study of the spatial distribution of settlements cultural heritage in the Grand Canal cultural belt and provide scientific reference and realistic basis for the protection, utilization and inheritance of the Grand Canal culture.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!