长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (9): 2018-2027.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202409015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江口入海总氮通量变化及区域来源特征

苏海1,娄保锋1*,邓世江2,黄波1,欧阳雪姣1   

  1. (1.生态环境部长江流域生态环境监督管理局生态环境监测与科学研究中心,湖北 武汉430010;2.四川省广元生态环境监测站,四川 广元 628000)
  • 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-24

Variation in Total Nitrogen Flux of the Yangtze River into the Sea

SU Hai1, LOU Bao-feng1,DENG Shi-jiang2,HUANG Bo1,OUYANG Xue-jiao1   

  1. (1.Yangtze River Basin Ecology and Environment Monitoring and Scientific Research Center, Yangtze River Basin Ecology and Environment Administration, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Wuhan 430010, China;2.Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Guangyuan,Sichuan Province,Guangyuan 628000,china)
  • Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-24

摘要: 长江口入海总氮通量对近海水域水环境、水生态具有重要影响,在优选断面基础上研究了2005~2022年长江口水域总氮浓度和入海通量。结果表明:(1)2005~2022年,入海总氮通量年际间波动较大,最大年通量(263万t/a)是最小年通量(116万t/a)的2.27倍;长江口水域总氮浓度和入海通量呈先升高后下降趋势,2008~2019时期入海总氮通量相对较高,大部分年份入海通量接近或超过200万t/a。2016年以来,长江入海总氮通量总体呈现下降趋势。(2)长江入海总氮年通量与年径流量的波动节律具有类似性,丰水年入海总氮通量偏高。相近年径流量情况下入海总氮通量对比表明,长江流域总氮污染控制成效明显。(3)2016~2022年,长江口水域总氮浓度特征为枯水期高于丰水期,平均高24%;入海总氮通量年内分布特征为丰水期高于枯水期,大约是枯水期的1.93倍。(4)2016~2022年,长江入海总氮年通量(平均为185万t/a)中,来自长江上游、洞庭湖、汉江和鄱阳湖的氮源分别占43.8%、24.4%、4.9%和10.8%。长江中下游干流区间净增的氮源(该区间内除上游、洞庭湖、汉江和鄱阳湖汇入的氮源外,通过其他支流汇入和直接进入该区间的氮源再扣除区间消耗后的部分后)占16.2%。

Abstract: The total nitrogen (TN) flux from the Yangtze River into the sea has a significant impact on the water environment and aquatic ecology of the coastal waters.Based on the selected cross-section, TN concentration and flux into the sea of the Yangtze River Estuary from 2005 to 2022 were studied.The results showed that: (1) Annual TN flux fluctuated greatly.The maximum (2.63 million ton/a) flux was 2.7 times of the minimum.The flux showed the trend of first increasing and then decreasing.During 2008 through 2019, fluxes were relatively high with greater 2.00 million ton/a in most years.Since 2016, the yearly TN flux showed an overall downward trend, from 2.63 million ton/a in 2016 to 1.16 million ton/a in 2022.(2) The annual TN flux and runoff fluctuated with the similar rhythm.A higher TN flux was often accompanied with a higher runoff.Comparisons under the condition of similar runoffs, the change of annual TN flux indicated the significant effectiveness in water pollution control.(3) TN concentration in the Yangtze River Estuary was higher during the dry season than during the wet season, with an average increase of 24%; However, TN flux into the sea was significantly higher during the wet season than that during the dry season, and the former was approximately 1.93 times that of latter.(4) During 2016~2022, TN loads from the upper reach of the Yangtze River, Dongting Lake, Han River, and Poyang Lake accounted for 43.8%, 24.4%, 4.9%, and 10.8%, respectively, of the total flux.The net increase in TN load in the mainstem of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze (excluding sources from the upstream, Dongting Lake, Han River, and Poyang Lake, i.e.TN loads from other tributaries and those entering directly the mainstem) accounted for 16.2%.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!