长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (11): 2540-2550.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202411018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

邻里效应、环保意识与农户耕地质量保护行为——来自江苏省的经验证据

余亮亮1 ,蔡银莺2   

  1. (1.华南理工大学公共管理学院,广东 广州 510641;2.华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-27

Neighbourhood Effects, Environmental Awareness and Farmers' Farmland Quality Protection Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Jiangsu Province

YU Liang-liang1,CAI Yin-ying2   

  1. (1.School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;2.College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
  • Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-27

摘要: 实证检验农户耕地质量保护行为中的邻里效应,分析环保意识在农户邻里效应中的调节作用,对完善耕地保护政策和保障国家粮食安全具有重要的现实意义。在理论分析基础上,提出相应的研究假说,基于中国土地经济调查2020年在江苏省开展的基线调研数据,运用实证计量模型加以检验。研究表明:(1)农户耕地质量保护行为中存在显著的邻里效应,邻里单位面积化肥施用量每提高10%,农户单位面积化肥施用量将会增加7.05%,邻里单位面积农药施用费用每提高10%,农户单位面积农药施用费用将会上升7.45%;(2)邻里效应在农户耕地质量保护行为中存在群体异质性,邻里效应对低收入和土地经营规模较小农户的耕地质量保护行为有显著的正向影响;(3)在耕地质量保护行为的邻里效应中,农户的环保意识起到重要的调节作用,较强的环保意识对耕地质量保护行为的邻里效应有显著的正向提升作用。基于此,国家应瞄准村庄中的高收入农户和土地规模经营户,积极引导他们减少化肥和农药的施用,然后通过邻里效应的示范引领,进而带动其他农户群体对耕地质量保护行为的采纳。此外,也应提高农户的环保意识,进而发挥环保意识在耕地质量保护邻里效应中的正向提升作用。

Abstract: It is of great practical significance to empirically examine the neighborhood effect in farm households' farmland quality protection behavior and to analyze the moderating role of environmental awareness in farmers' neighborhood effect. This paper aimed to improve farmland protection policies and to guarantee national food security. This paper employed methods that were based on the mechanism analysis. The baseline data from the China Land Economy Survey 2020 conducted in Jiangsu Province were used to empirically test the research hypotheses. The results showed that: (1) There was a significant neighbourhood effect in the farm household's farmland quality protection behaviour. For every 10% increase in the neighbour's per mu fertilizer application, the farm household's per mu fertilizer application would increase by 7.05%, and for every 10% increase in the neighbour's per mu pesticide application cost, the farm household's per mu pesticide application cost would increase by 7.45%. (2) Neighbourhood effects were group heterogeneous in farm households' cropland quality protection behaviours, and neighbourhood effects had a significant positive impact on the cropland quality protection behaviours of low-income and smaller landholding farm households. (3) In the neighbourhood effect of arable land quality protection behaviour, farmers' environmental protection awareness played an important moderating role, and farmers' stronger environmental protection awareness had a significant positive effect on the neighbourhood effect of arable land quality protection behaviour. Based on this, the state should target high-income farmers and large-scale land operators in villages and actively guided them to reduce the application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. It was also important to lead them through the demonstration of the neighborhood effect, which in turn led to the adoption of arable land quality protection behaviors by other groups of farmers. In addition, the environmental awareness of farmers should also be raised further, which in turn would be helpful in enhancing the neighborhood effect of cropland quality protection.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!