长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (12): 2661-2674.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202412009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于结构-功能的土地利用冲突精准识别与分区管控

杨欢1,2,3,陈文波1,2*,张宇佳3,段鹏1,2,3,梁翔1,2,3   

  1. (1.东华理工大学测绘与空间信息工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;2.东华理工大学南昌市景观过程与国土空间生态修复重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013;3.江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院,江西 南昌 330045)
  • 出版日期:2024-12-20 发布日期:2024-12-27

Accurate Identification and Zoning Control of Land Use Conflicts Based on Structure and Function

YANG Huan1,2,3, CHEN Wen-bo1,2, ZHANG Yu-jia3, DUAN Peng1,2,3, LIANG Xiang1,2,3   

  1. (1. School of Surveying and Spatial Information Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China; 2. Nanchang Key Laboratory of Landscape Process and Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China; 3. College of Land Resource and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)
  • Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-27

摘要: 精准识别土地利用之间的冲突对优化国土空间布局,对促进区域发展具有重要意义。以鄱阳湖生态经济区为研究对象,基于网格单元,采用生态风险模型和用地适宜性评价模型构建土地利用结构冲突测度体系和功能冲突测度体系,并将结构冲突与功能冲突进行叠加分析,识别出土地利用冲突类型,并提出相应的管控对策。结果表明:(1)结构冲突共分为重度、中度、一般和轻度冲突区四类,其中中度冲突数量最多,共有1 324个网格单元,主要分布在人类活动频发的城镇化水平较高地区。(2)农业用地、生态用地及建设用地的适宜性分值范围分别为35.08~86.30、47.80~92.80及22.51~93.46,农业用地适宜性呈现南部高,东西两侧偏低的分布;生态用地适宜性呈现东西高,中部低的分布;建设用地适宜性呈现中部南部高,西部低的分布。功能冲突共有1 885个单元,以强冲突区为主,集中分布在南部和中部的地势平坦地区。(3)综合结构和功能冲突结果,将鄱阳湖生态经济区土地利用冲突共分为弱冲突可控区、单结构失控区、单功能失控区和结构功能双失控区四类。针对研究区的土地利用冲突类型,提出优化国土空间布局,控制建设用地的增量,建立保护区过渡带等管控措施,以期为鄱阳湖生态经济区社会经济发展和国土空间规划提供科学指导。


Abstract: Accurate identification of conflicts between land uses is of great significance to optimize the spatial layout of land and promote regional development. Taking Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone as the research object, this paper adopted the ecological risk model and land use suitability evaluation model to construct the measurement systems of land use structural conflict and functional conflict. This paper overlaid the structural conflict with the functional conflict to identify the type of land use conflict, based on grid cells. The corresponding control countermeasures were put forward. The results showed as follows. 1) Structural conflicts were divided into four categories including heavy, moderate, general and light conflict areas. The moderate conflicts were found to be the largest, with a total of 1 324 grid cells. The area was mainly distributed in the high urbanization level where human activities were obvious. 2) The suitability scores for agricultural, ecological and construction land use ranged from 35.08 to 86.30, 47.80 to 92.80 and 22.51 to 93.46, respectively. The suitability of agricultural land showed a larger distribution in the south and a smaller distribution in the east and west. The suitability of ecological land showed a larger distribution in the east and west and a smaller distribution in the center. The suitability of construction land showed a larger distribution in the center and south and a smaller distribution in the west. The area of functional conflict occupied a total of 1 885 cells, which was dominated by strong conflict zones in the southern and central regions with a flat terrain. 3) By synthesizing the results of structural and functional conflicts, the land use conflicts in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone were divided into four categories, namely, weak conflict controllable area, single structural out-of-control area, single functional out-of-control area and structural-functional double out-of-control area. With regard to the types of land use conflicts in the study area, control measures of optimizing the spatial layout of the land, controlling the increment of construction land, and establishing the transition zone of the protected area were proposed in order to provide scientific guidance for the socio-economic development and spatial planning of Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!