长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (1): 191-202.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202501015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“一水共护”迈向“一域共富”:跨域生态保护补偿模式何以可能?

朱新华1,2,陈怡静1   

  1. (1.河海大学公共管理学院,江苏 南京 211100;2.长江保护与绿色发展研究院,江苏 南京 210024)
  • 出版日期:2025-01-20 发布日期:2025-01-24

From "One Water Co Protection" to "One Region Co Prosperity": How Is the Cross Domain Ecological Protection Compensation Model Possible?

ZHU Xin-hua1,2,CHEN Yi-jing1    

  1. (1.School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;2.Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210024, China)
  • Online:2025-01-20 Published:2025-01-24

摘要: 运用制度变迁、府际合作和集体行动等相关理论,以“新安江”生态补偿模式为例,探讨了跨域生态补偿模式能否成为促进区域可持续发展的有效手段。研究发现:(1)在中央政府主导、地方政府服务下,跨域生态补偿模式顺应现代化治理发展要求,以多元共治的方式,构建起横向、整体的补偿—约束—共治—共享的联动制度,成为推进流域管辖地从“一水共护”迈向“一域共富”的长效机制。(2)跨域生态补偿模式的可持续发展源于制度安排内生的环境需求,单纯依赖于纵向外部扶持,将难以达到全流域范围内的均衡治理。(3)跨界生态补偿模式效能的发挥,应具备灵活的制度供给、坚实的生态治理推力及创新性的跨域治理格局等基本要件,以适配政治结构、经济结构及社会结构相衔接的环境场域。“新安江”生态补偿模式的更新迭代,为探索中国式现代化生态补偿制度安排提供了一种有效的路径选择。

Abstract: This article applied relevant theories such as institutional change, intergovernmental cooperation, and collective action, to explore whether the cross regional ecological compensation model could become an effective way to promote regional sustainable development. The "Xin'an River" ecological compensation model was taken as a study example. This study found that: (1)Under the leadership of the central government and the service of local governments to meet the requirements of modern development, the cross regional ecological compensation model should construct a horizontal and an overall compensation in a manner of sharing linkage system. This should become a long-term mechanism to promote the transition of watershed jurisdiction from "one water co protection" to "one region co prosperity". (2)The sustainable development of the cross regional ecological compensation model originated from the endogenous environmental needs of institutional arrangements. Relying solely on vertical external support would be difficult to achieve balanced governance across the entire basin.(3)The effectiveness of cross-border ecological compensation models should have basic elements such as flexible institutional supply, solid ecological governance momentum, and innovative cross regional governance patterns. The renewal and iteration of the "Xin'an River" ecological compensation model provided an effective path choice for exploring the Chinese path to modernization ecological compensation system arrangement.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .