长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (6): 1354-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202506016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡库区漂浮物治理的跨界合作机制与动态策略

高攀1,李建慧1,赵旭1,2*   

  1. (1.三峡大学经济与管理学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;2.三峡大学水库移民研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002)
  • 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-27

Cross Boundary Collaborative Mechanism and Dynamic Strategy for Floating Debris Management in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

GAO Pan, LI Jian-hui, ZHAO Xu    

  1. (1.School of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China;2.Research Center for Reservoir Resettlement, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)
  • Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-27

摘要: 为促进流域清漂点的合作治理,提升三峡库区漂浮物治理成效,构建上下游清漂点与监管机构的多元共治演化博弈模型,分析达成协同策略均衡的关键因素,并结合三峡库区清漂实情,运用系统动力学进行仿真优化,揭示漂浮物治理策略的演化规律。研究表明:(1)上下游清漂点跨界合作意愿的提升,可缓解政府监管压力,进而间接促进清漂点合作治理均衡的达成,同时其合作意愿变化具有同步性,流域下游清漂点治理意愿更加依赖上游的行为选择;(2)地方政府在综合考虑清漂能力、清漂范围等因素的基础上,通过实施严格的奖惩机制,并公平分配合作效益,可有效避免上下游清漂点陷入局部利益矛盾;(3)工程业主合理的清漂资金投入和差异化的补贴策略,可有效化解政府与企业相互推责,并促进清漂点合作治理;(4)上下游清漂点作为利益共同体,增强彼此的信任感,是达成跨界合作治理的驱动力。

Abstract: Abstract:In order to enhance the effectiveness of floating debris management in the reservoir area of hydro-power projects, we constructed a multivariate co-governance evolution game model incorporating upstream and downstream clearing points and regulators.We also analyzed the key factors required to achieve the collaborative strategy's equilibrium and combined this with the real situation of clearing debris in the Three Gorges Reservoir area.In addition, we used system dynamics to simulate and optimize the game, revealing the evolution of the strategy for floating debris management.The study revealed that: (1) The improvement of the willingness of cross-border cooperation between upstream and downstream drifting points could alleviate the pressure of government supervision, and indirectly promoted the achievement of a balanced governance of drifting point cooperation.Simultaneously, the changes in their willingness to cooperate were synchronized, and the willingness of the downstream clearing points in the basin to manage the drifting debris was more influenced by the behavioral choices of the upstream points.(2) The local government could keep the upstream and downstream clearing points from becoming local interest conflicts by enforcing strict rules for rewards and punishments and ensuringthat everyone who worked together could get a fair share of the benefits.This was based on a thorough analysis of clearing capacity and other factors.(3) Reasonable clearing capital input and a differentiated subsidy strategy from the project owner could effectively resolve the mutual blame between the government and the enterprise and could promote the cooperative governance of the clearing points.(4) Common interests of upstream and downstream clearing points might enhance the sense of trust among each other, which was a driving force to reach cross-border cooperative governance.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .