长江流域资源与环境 >> 2008, Vol. 17 >> Issue (4): 651-651.

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

岷江上游泥石流堵河可能性的经验公式判别

张金山1,2,谢 洪1,2   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-20

CALCULATION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF RIVERBLOCKING DUE TO DEBRIS FLOW IN THE UPPER REACHES OF MINJIANG RIVER  

ZHANG Jinshan1,2, XIE Hong1,2   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-07-20

摘要:

泥石流堵塞主河,特别是堵断主河后发生重大灾害的实例屡见不鲜,对泥石流堵河的研究也方兴未艾。选取岷江上游具有代表性的堵河型泥石流沟4条、堵塞型泥石流沟及不堵河型泥石流沟各2条,通过文献查阅、实地调查得到各泥石流沟的基本数据、泥石流堵河状况及入汇处主河特征的资料,对堵河型泥石流基本特征进行分析总结,并与堵塞型、不堵河型泥石流沟进行比较,得出计算泥石流堵断主河可能性大小的经验公式,并对所选典型泥石流沟进行了计算。经分析,计算结果与实际相符,故在岷江上游干旱河谷区,可用此式计算泥石流堵河可能性大小,并依此来判断泥石流对主河的堵塞程度,计算数值越大,堵塞程度就越高,一般堵河可能性〖WTBX〗R〖WTBZ〗在10以上为易于堵河,介于5~10可对主河造成较严重的堵塞,小于5则堵河的可能性很小,多产生轻微堵塞。〖

 

关键词: 岷江上游, 泥石流堵河, 可能性, 经验公式

Abstract:

There are so much serious disasters caused by the debris flow which blocking the mainriver that more and more scholars pay their attention to it.In order to offering the references to controlling of debris flow disasters,such as the assessment of debris flow and the danger degree of debris flow division,the characteristic of the blocking main river type of debris flow and estimating the danger degree of a blocking main river type 8 debris flow gullies were studied in the paper.4 blocking main river type of debris flow gullies,2 semiblocking main river type of debris flow gullies and 2 nonblocking main river types of debris flow gullies in the upper reach of Minjiang River were analyzed.Based on the analysis and comparing characteristics of 8 debris flow gully samples,representational fluid characteristics of each debris flow gully and the characteristics of main rivers where debris flow gully converge,and combining with the works of some scholars,the experiential equation of assessing the possibility in debris flow blocking main river was concluded.

 

Key words: upper reaches of Minjiang River, riverblocking due to debris flow, possibility, experiential equation  

[1] 陈金月, 王石英. 岷江上游生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 471-479.
[2] 樊敏, 郭亚琳, 李富程, 王青. 岷江上游山区聚落生态位地理特征与驱动因子间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1687-1696.
[3] 王洪梅,彭 林. 岷江上游水电开发不同阶段所引发问题的综合分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 475-475.
[4] 冯文兰,周万村,李爱农,张宝雷,. 基于GIS的岷江上游乡村聚落空间聚集特征分析——以茂县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 57-57.
[5] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821-821.
[6] 高玄彧,李 勇. 岷江上游和中游几个河段的下蚀率对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 517-521.
[7] 刘世梁, 傅伯杰,刘国华,马克明. 岷江上游退耕还林与生态恢复的问题和对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 506-510.
[8] 叶延琼,陈国阶. GIS支持下的岷江上游流域景观格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 112-115.
[9] 刘丽娟,昝国盛,葛剑平,毕晓丽,周 睿. MTCLIM模型在岷江上游气候模拟中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(2): 248-253.
[10] 张一平,段泽新,窦军霞,. 岷江上游干暖河谷与元江干热河谷的气候特征比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 76-82.
[11] 姚 建,丁 晶,艾南山. 岷江上游生态脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 380-383.
[12] 陈 勇,陈国阶,杨定国. 岷江上游聚落分布规律及其生态特征——以四川理县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!