长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1687-1696.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201611007

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

岷江上游山区聚落生态位地理特征与驱动因子间关系研究

樊敏, 郭亚琳, 李富程, 王青   

  1. 西南科技大学环境与资源学院, 四川 绵阳 621010
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-11 修回日期:2016-06-24 出版日期:2016-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 王青,E-mail:qingw@imde.an.cn E-mail:qingw@imde.an.cn
  • 作者简介:樊敏(1984~),女,博士,讲师,主要从事山区生态服务功能与规划研究.E-mail:firstfanmin@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAC05B05);四川省科技支撑计划项目(2014SZ0058);西南科技大学博士基金(15zx7132)

STUDY ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN GEOGRAPHICAL FEATURES OF MOUNTAINOUS SETTLEMENT ECOLOGICAL NICHE AND DRIVING FACTORS IN THE UPPER REACHES OF MIN RIVER

FAN Min, GUO Ya-lin, LI Fu-cheng, WANG Qing   

  1. School of Environment and Resource, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
  • Received:2016-03-11 Revised:2016-06-24 Online:2016-11-20
  • Supported by:
    China National Science and Technology Support Program(2015BAC05B05);Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program(2014SZ0058);Southwest University of Science and Technology(15zx7132)

摘要: 山区聚落生态位反映聚落在山地垂直方向上所处的空间位置及人类生活所能利用的资源空间,是当地居民长期适应山地自然环境的结果。基于岷江上游各民族山区聚落生态位和气象、社会、地形驱动因子的空间分布,借助冗余分析,构建山区聚落生态位地理特征与驱动因子间的多水平贝叶斯模型,定量刻画聚落生态位的民族属性对山区聚落生态位地理特征与驱动因子间关系的影响。结果表明:(1)影响研究区域内1 667个与各民族聚落生态位地理特征的驱动因子有显著差异,海拔和坡度对前者影响较大,海拔、坡度、干季和湿季湿度、距河流距离对后者影响较大,且海拔对两者的影响程度都最大,海拔和坡度地形驱动因子与干、湿季湿度和距河流距离间的相关性较弱。(2)干、湿季湿度气象驱动因子对藏-羌聚落生态位地理特征影响较大,距河流距离和距县城距离社会驱动因子、海拔和坡度地形驱动因子对藏族聚落生态位地理特征影响较大,这与藏族聚落生态位的分布面积和个数有关。(3)民族类型对聚落生态位地理特征指标与气象因子干季湿度间关系的影响最大,对聚落生态位地理特征指标与地形因子坡度间关系的影响最小。岷江上游山区聚落生态位地理特征与驱动因子间关系的研究,为量化山区聚落生态位与山地环境的关系提供了有效的数据支撑。

关键词: 山区聚落, 生态位, 地理特征, 民族类型, 驱动因子, 岷江上游

Abstract: The mountainous settlement ecological niche could reflect located spatial position of the settlement vertically along the mountain and resources space available to the settlement for sustenance, which is consequence of the local settlers adapt to mountainous natural environment in the long-term. Based on the spatial distribution of mountainous settlement ecological niche of individual nationality categories and meteorological, social, and topographical driving factors, this study established the Multilevel Bayesian Model between the geographical features of mountainous settlement ecological niche (the area, perimeter, and the ratio of perimeter to area of mountainous settlement ecological niche) and driving factors (meteorological, social, and topographical driving factors) by Redundant Analysis and Bayesian theory. It could quantify the affect of nationality category on the relationships between the geographical features of mountainous settlement ecological niche and driving factors. The detailed results were as following:1) There were obvious differences between driving factors impacted on the geographical features of whole 1667 nationalities in the study site and that influenced on the geographical features of individual nationalities, the altitude and slope have further impact on the former, the altitude, slope, dry humidity, wet humidity, and distance to river have further effect on the latter. Besides, the topographical driving factor altitude played an important role both the whole 1667 nationalities and individual nationalities. The topographical driving factors altitude and slope were weakly correlated to humidity of dry season, humidity of wet season, distance to river. 2) The humidity of dry season and humidity of wet season significant effected on the geographical features of Tibetan and Qiang nationalities settlement ecological niches, and the social driving factors distance to river, distance to county, the topographical factors altitude and slope significantly impacted on geographical features of Tibetan settlement ecological niche which related to its distributed areas and number. 3) The nationality category had furthest impact on the relationships between geographical features of mountainous settlement ecological niche and meteorological factor dry humidity, the second was social driving factor distance to county, the last one was topographical driving factor slope. In summary, the study on the relationships between the geographical features of mountainous settlement ecological niche and driving factors could provide the data support for quantifying the relationship between settlement ecological niche and mountainous environment.

Key words: mountainous settlement, ecological niche, geographical feature, nationality category, driving factor, the Upper Reaches of Min River

中图分类号: 

  • K903
[1] 陈国阶. 西部大开发与聚落生态建设——以西南山区为例[J]. 农村生态环境, 2001, 17(2):5-8.[CHEN G J. Development of west China and the construction of settlement ecology-take the southwest mountainous area of China as an example[J]. Rural Eco-Environment, 2001, 17(2):5-8.]
[2] 马旭, 王青, 丁明涛, 等. 岷江上游山区聚落生态位及其模型[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(5):574-578.[MA X, WANG Q, DING M T, et al. Econiche of the settlements in mountains of the upper reaches of Min River and its mathematical model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2012, 28(5):574-578.]
[3] 包维楷, 陈庆恒, 刘照光. 岷江上游山地生态系统的退化及其恢复与重建对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1995, 4(3):277-282.[BAO W K, CHEN Q H, LIU Z G. Degradation of mountain ecosystem in the Upper Reaches of Mingjiang River and coutermeasures for their rehabilitation and reconstruction[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin, 1995, 4(3):277-282.]
[4] 刘邵权. 农村聚落生态研究:理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2006:124-134.[LIU S Q. Rural settlement ecology:theory and practice[M]. Beijing:China Environmental Sciences Press, 2006:124-134.]
[5] CHEN Y, CHEN G J, WANG Q. Two village ecosystems in the upper Minjiang River, China:a comparison of emergy flow[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Science, 2003, 8(3B):935-939.
[6] 王青, 石敏球, 郭亚琳, 等. 岷江上游山区聚落生态位垂直分异研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(11):1559-1567.[WANG Q, SHI M Q, GUO Y L, et al. The vertical differentiation of the mountain settlement niche in the upper reaches of Minjiang River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica 2013, 68(11):1559-1567.]
[7] 闫卫坡, 王青, 郭亚琳, 等. 岷江上游山区聚落生态位地域边界划分与垂直分异分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(5):572-576.[YAN W P, WANG Q, GUO Y L, et al. Delineation of geographical boundaries of settlement niches in mountains of the upper reaches of the Min River and analysis of their vertical differentiation[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2013, 29(5):572-576.]
[8] 陈勇, 陈国阶, 杨定国. 岷江上游聚落分布规律及其生态特征——以四川理县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1):72-77.[CHEN Y, CHEN G J, YANG D G. Distribution of human settlements in the upstream Minjiang River and their ecological characteristics-a case study of Lixian county[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2004, 13(1):72-77.]
[9] 陈勇, 陈国阶, 刘邵权, 等. 川西南山地民族聚落生态研究——以米易县麦地村为例[J]. 山地学报, 2005, 23(1):108-114.[CHEN Y, CHEN G J, LIU S Q, et al. Ecological studies of human settlements of ethnic groups in southwestern Sichuan-a case study of Maidi Village, Miyi County[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2005, 23(1):108-114.]
[10] 刘延国, 黄成敏, 王青, 等. 岷江上游山区杂谷脑河流域聚落变迁规律及其驱动机制实证研究[J]. 海南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 27(1):57-62.[LIU Y G, HUANG C M, WANG Q, et al. An empirical research on evolution characteristics and dynamic mechanism of rural settlements in mountain areas of the Upstream of Minjiang River[J]. Journal of Hainan Normal University (Natural Science), 2014, 27(1):57-62.]
[11] 包维楷, 王春明. 岷江上游山地生态系统的退化机制[J]. 山地学报, 2000, 18(1):57-62.[BAO W K, WANG C M. Degradation mechanism of mountain ecosystem at the dry valley in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2000, 18(1):57-62.]
[12] GUO Y L, WANG Q, YAN W P, et al. Assessment of habitat suitability in the Upper Reaches of the Min River in China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 12(3):737-746.
[13] BORCARD D, GILLET F, LEGENDRE P. Numerical ecology with R[M]. New York:Springer, 2011:204-214.
[14] 张振明, 余新晓, 朱建刚. 多水平贝叶斯模型预测森林土壤全氮[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(10):5675-5683.[ZHANG Z M, YU X X, ZHU J G. Hierarchical bayesian model for predicting the soil nitrogen of forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(10):5675-5683.]
[15] GELMAN A, HILL J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2006:12-24.
[16] FAN M, SHIBATA H. Water yield, nitrogen and sediment retentions in Northern Japan (Teshio river watershed):land use change scenario analysis[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21(1):119-133.
[17] WENDROTH O, JÜRSCHIK P, KERSEBAUM K C, et al. Identifying, understanding, and describing spatial processes in agricultural landscape-four case studies[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2001, 58(3/4):113-127.
[18] 于文婧, 孙丹峰, 曲葳. 基于冗余分析的宁夏平罗耕地土壤盐渍化特征研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(5):103-110.[YU W J, SUN D F, QU W. Study of the characteristics of soil salinization based on redundancy analysis in Pingluo, Ningxia[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2015, 20(5):103-110.]
[19] 于雪, 濮励杰, 许艳, 等. 1980~2010年江苏沿海城市土地利用变化及其与环境因子关系分析——以东台市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(4):537-543.[YU X, PU L J, XU Y, et al. Analysis of land use changes in relation to environmental variables in coastal city in Jiangsu Province from 1980 to 2010:a case study in Dongtai City[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(4):537-543.]
[1] 张雪茹, 姚亦锋, 孔少君, 严菊颖. 南京市2000~2014年城市建设用地变化及驱动因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 552-562.
[2] 李鑫, 肖长江, 欧名豪, 楼淑瑜. 基于生态位适宜度理念的城镇用地空间优化配置研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 376-383.
[3] 陈金月, 王石英. 岷江上游生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 471-479.
[4] 王晓荣, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 潘磊, 曾立雄. 三峡库区消落带水淹初期主要优势草本植物生态位变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 404-411.
[5] 冯兴华, 钟业喜, 李建新, 黄洁. 长江中游城市群县域城镇化水平空间格局演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 899-908.
[6] 方婷婷, 程久苗, 费罗成. 繁昌县后备土地资源多宜性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 750-757.
[7] 王文林, 唐晓燕, 胡孟春, 王国祥. 人工重建的水生植物群落演替动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 802-.
[8] 郭杰, 欧名豪, 刘琼, 欧维新. 江苏省耕地资源动态变化及驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 139-.
[9] 张金山,谢 洪,. 岷江上游泥石流堵河可能性的经验公式判别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 651-651.
[10] 王洪梅,彭 林. 岷江上游水电开发不同阶段所引发问题的综合分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 475-475.
[11] 冯文兰,周万村,李爱农,张宝雷,. 基于GIS的岷江上游乡村聚落空间聚集特征分析——以茂县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 57-57.
[12] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821-821.
[13] 郑海霞, 童菊儿, 郑朝洪, 徐 扬. 东南沿海经济发达地区耕地数量的动态变化及其驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 435-435.
[14] 高玄彧,李 勇. 岷江上游和中游几个河段的下蚀率对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 517-521.
[15] 刘世梁, 傅伯杰,刘国华,马克明. 岷江上游退耕还林与生态恢复的问题和对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 506-510.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4] 程 江,何 青,王元叶,刘 红,夏小明. 长江河口细颗粒泥沙絮凝体粒径的谱分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[5] 彭 建,景 娟,吴健生,蒋依依,张 源. 乡村产业结构评价——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 蔡述明. 研究长江中游地区水资源开发利用的新成果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[8] 段学花 王兆印 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[9] 王宏巍. 俄罗斯土壤污染防治立法研究及其对构建我国《土壤污染防治法》的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 326 .
[10] 刘蓓蓓, 李凤英, 俞钦钦, 于洋, 毕军. 长江三角洲城市间环境公平性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .