长江流域资源与环境 >> 2006, Vol. 15 >> Issue (2): 219-222.

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

洞庭湖区不同利用方式下农田土壤有机碳含量特征

唐国勇,彭佩钦,苏以荣,童成立,吴金水,黄伟生,朱奇宏   

  • 收稿日期:2005-06-21 修回日期:2005-07-22 出版日期:2006-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 唐国勇

CONTENTS OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON UNDER VARIOUS LANDUSE TYPES AT FARMLAND IN DONGTING LAKE REGION

TANG Guo-yong, PENG Pei-qin, SU Yi-rong, TONG Cheng-li, WU Jin-shui, HUANG Wei-sheng, ZHU Qi-hong   

  • Received:2005-06-21 Revised:2005-07-22 Online:2006-03-20
  • Contact: TANG Guo-yong

摘要: 土地利用方式是影响土壤有机碳含量和动态的重要因子之一。其利用方式的改变必将引起土壤有机碳含量发生相应的变化。在洞庭湖腹地选取典型样区,通过调查走访和密集取样,分析了不同土地利用方式(旱地、水旱轮作地、一季稻水田和双季稻水田)下623个农田耕层土样有机碳含量。结果表明,研究区内土壤有机碳含量高低顺序为双季稻水田(28.12 g/kg) > 一季稻水田(27.03 g/kg) > 水旱轮作地(24.79 g/kg) > 旱地(17.96 g/kg),其差异均达到极显著水平(P < 0.01)。土地生产力、秸秆还田量和土壤水文状态是导致不同利用方式下耕层土壤有机碳含量差异的主要原因。进一步分析表明:加强作物秸秆还田(土)、提高土地复种指数、增加地表覆盖是维持和提高洞庭湖区耕作土壤有机碳含量的可行措施,尤其是旱作土壤。

关键词: 土地利用方式, 土壤有机碳, 秸秆还田, 耕作土壤, 洞庭湖区

Abstract: Change in landuse type is a key factor affecting the contents and dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC). The understanding of the characteristics of SOC contents under various landuse types at farmland in Dongting Lake Region is essential to make judicious landuse policy and maintain land productivity. By investigation, sampling and laboratory analysis, the SOC contents at four typical landuse types (including dryland, flood drought rotation land, single cropping paddy field and double cropping paddy field) at farmland in Dongting Lake Region were studied. The results showed that the difference in the SOC contents at any two landuse types was highly significant (P < 0.01) and the SOC contents order was: double cropping paddy field (28.12 g/kg) > single cropping paddy field (27.03 g/kg) > flood drought rotation land (24.79 g/kg) > dryland (17.96 g/kg). It is illustrated that the land productivity, amount of straw returning and soil hydrological condition were main factors determining the differences in the SOC contents at various landuse types. The results further revealed that improving amount of straw returning, increasing in plant cropping, strengthening mulch on soil surface can maintain, and even enhance the SOC contents, especially at dry farming land in Dongting Lake Region.

Key words: landuse types, soil organic carbon, straw returning, cultivated soil, Dongting Lake Region

[1] 张文婷. 江西省不同地貌单元耕地土壤有机碳空间变异的尺度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2619-2628.
[2] 布乃顺, 胡悦, 杨骁, 张雪, 王俭, 李博, 方长明, 宋有涛. 互花米草入侵对长江河口湿地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 100-109.
[3] 谢谦, 朱翔, 贺清云, 徐美. 洞庭湖区血吸虫病疫水人水相互作用关系及防控方案研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 655-663.
[4] 和丽萍, 孟广涛, 李贵祥, 李品荣, 柴勇. 金沙江头塘小流域人工林有机碳及其剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 476-485.
[5] 黄爱军| 赵, 锋| 陈雪凤| 张 莉| 杨 菲| 张卫建. 施肥与秸秆还田对太湖稻-油复种系统春季杂草群落特征的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(6): 515-.
[6] 陈亮中,谢宝元,肖文发,黄志霖. 三峡库区主要森林植被类型土壤有机碳贮量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 640-640.
[7] 汪朝辉,谭德宝,王克林,熊 艳. 洞庭湖区景观镶嵌结构和分形特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 579-583.
[8] 谢春花,王克林,陈洪松,张明阳. 土地利用变化对洞庭湖区生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 191-195.
[9] 芮雯奕,周 博,张卫建. 长江三角洲水田保护性耕作制度的碳收集效应估算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 207-212.
[10] 梁守真,李仁东,朱超洪. 洞庭湖区生态服务价值变化区域差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 196-200.
[11] 朱超洪, 李仁东. 洞庭湖区土地利用变化对地表产流的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 566-569.
[12] 彭佩钦,仇少君. 洞庭湖区农业环境与湖垸农业可持续发展模式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 322-326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!