长江流域资源与环境 >> 2008, Vol. 17 >> Issue (5): 761-761.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

平原地区复合土地利用系统中氮磷流失敏感区界定

周 翠| 王丽平| 章明奎   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-09-20

DENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF CRITICAL AREAS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RUNOFF IN COMPLEX LAND USE SYSTEMS IN PLAIN AREA
——A CASE STUDY IN HUAJIACHI CAMPUS, ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY

ZHOU Cui, WANG Liping, ZHANG Mingkui   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-09-20

摘要:

为正确识别平原地区复合土地利用系统中氮磷流失敏感区,利用美国农业部水土保持局设计的水文模型中的〖WTBX〗CN〖WTBZ〗值描述地表状况,反映不同土地利用条件下下垫面对土壤氮、磷流失的影响;运用等标污染负荷计算方法评估不同类型污染源强度;建立了复合土地利用系统中土壤氮、磷流失敏感区的综合指数评价体系。构建的氮、磷流失评价方法在浙江大学华家池校区的应用评价结果表明,氮磷流失敏感性高的区块主要为研究区内的居民区、畜牧场和一些施肥量大的种植区,而敏感性最低的区块集中在具有良好植被覆盖的绿化区。高的污染源和高的迁移因子叠加区构成了高的流失敏感区.

关键词: 土壤氮磷流失, 复合土地利用系统, 敏感区, 综合指数法

Abstract:

Economic development and population explosion are two major driving forces that alter local land use and increase nonpoint source pollution.To overcome the threat of severe pollution and protect limited water resource,it is necessary to develop an integrated evaluation approach to understand the risk of the nitrogen and phosphorous leached from soils in complex land use systems.Based on analysis of factors influencing P and N runoff from fields,a comprehensive index assessment model was designed.To simplify the complex land use,runoff curve number (〖WTBX〗CN〖WTBZ〗) of Soil Conservation Service (SCS) of America was employed to express the differences in surface runoff resulted from different land use,and the equivalent standard pollution index method was taken to calculate the intensity of various type of pollution sources.A case study of Huajiachi Campus,Zhejiang University was taken to evaluate its reliability.The model was modified according to the real situation,to ensure its good performance.The results indicated that the high pollution sources plus high pollutant transportation potential can result in high risk of nitrogen and phosphorous leaching.The residential area,stock farm and heavy fertilized farm were high risk areas,while areas with well vegetation covered had low risk.The assessment model established in the paper can be applied to evaluate runoff potentials of N and P leached from complex land systems.

Key words: soil nitrogen and phosphorous runoff, complex land use system, critical area, comprehensive index method

[1] 谢雅婷, 周忠发, 闫利会, 牛颖超, 王历. 贵州省石漠化敏感区生态红线空间分异与管控措施研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 624-630.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗秉征. 河口及近海的生态特点与渔业资源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 4 .
[2] 葛刚, 徐燕花, 赵磊, 吴志强, 吴兰. 鄱阳湖典型湿地土壤有机质及氮素空间分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 619 .
[3] 陈姗姗, 束炯, 徐建中. 中国若干典型城市对流层NO2时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1484 .
[4] 左倬, 由文辉, 汪冬冬. 上海青浦区不同用地类型河流滨岸带生境及植物群落组成[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 116 .
[5] 陈 锋 | 赵先富 | 赵进勇 | 李 敏. 瓯江鱼类资源调查及保护对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(08): 934 .
[6] 李德旺|李红清 |雷晓琴|雷明军. 基于GIS技术及层次分析法的长江上游生态敏感性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 633 .
[7] 何 丹| 杨犇. 高速铁路对沿线地区可达性的影响研究——以皖北地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(11): 1264 .
[8] 王晓辉,杨 晨. 基于GIS和地统计学的淮南矿区土壤重金属含量与空间分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 60 .
[9] 苏国欢, 沙永翠, 熊鹰, 张培育, 徐军. 大坝截流前后金沙江观音岩水电站鱼类群落功能多样性的变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 965 -970 .
[10] 刘乙淼, 陈艳梅, 胡引翠. 长江流域土壤保持能力时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 971 -977 .