长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (04): 624-630.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201704016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州省石漠化敏感区生态红线空间分异与管控措施研究

谢雅婷1,2, 周忠发1,2, 闫利会1,2, 牛颖超1,2, 王历1,2   

  1. 1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院, 贵州 贵阳 550001;
    2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心, 贵州 贵阳 550001
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-29 修回日期:2016-11-28 出版日期:2017-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 周忠发 E-mail:fa6897@163.com
  • 作者简介:谢雅婷(1991~),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为地理信息系统与遥感.E-mail:1527973657@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(2012CB723202);国家自然科学基金(41301504);贵州省重大应用基础研究项目(黔科合JZ字[2014]200201);贵州省发展和改革委员会委托-2015年贵州省节能减排省级专项资金投资计划项目(黔发改环资[2015]1612号)

STUDY ON SPATIAL VARIATION AND CONTROL MEASURES OF ECOLOGICAL RED LINE IN ROCKY DESERTIFICATION SENSITIVE AREA OF GUIZHOU PROVINCE

XIE Ya-ting1,2, ZHOU Zhong-fa1,2, YAN Li-hui1,2, NIU Ying-chao1,2, WANG Li1,2   

  1. 1. School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;
    2. State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China
  • Received:2016-08-29 Revised:2016-11-28 Online:2017-04-20
  • Supported by:
    National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program)(2012CB723202);National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301504);The Major Application Foundation Research Project of Guizhou Province (Guizhou S&T Contract JZ 2014-200201);Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission Commissioned-Guizhou Province in 2015 the Provincial Energy-saving Emission Reduction Special Funds Investment Projects (Guizhou NDRC Environmental Assistance Project 2015-1612)

摘要: 贵州省石漠化演变态势遏制了长江、珠江流域的生态安全需要。为响应国家生态环境保护与修复政策,加强长江上游生态保护工作,遏制贵州省生态环境恶化趋势,研究基于遥感和GIS技术,针对贵州省喀斯特石漠化等典型生态环境问题,依据《生态红线划定技术指南》(2015-06)建立敏感性评价指标体系及评价模型,评价贵州省石漠化敏感性现状,划定石漠化敏感区生态保护红线,定量揭示贵州省石漠化敏感区生态红线现状及地域分异,并根据贵州省石漠化治理实际情况,提出具体管控措施。结果表明:(1)2011年贵州省石漠化敏感性以强度敏感性为主,面积达36 227.83 km2,占全省喀斯特地貌面积的32.23%,总体分布规律呈条带状分布;(2)通过叠加分析得出石漠化敏感区的空间分布与石漠化现状有一定关系,表现为除去无明显石漠化、潜在石漠化、不敏感性、轻度敏感性之外,已石漠化土地与中度以上敏感性所占面积比例变化趋势呈正相关。(3)贵州省石漠化敏感区生态红线面积达6 814.25 km2,占全省国土面积的3.87%;主要由破碎斑块组成,较集中分布于贵州北部、南部及西部地区,其中遵义市、毕节市以及黔南州面积最大、最集中;(4)石漠化敏感区生态红线的管控措施应实施治理与保护并行,主要以保护为主,同时,加强石漠化敏感区综合治理以及生态保护政策体系建设。

关键词: 生态红线, 石漠化敏感区, 空间分异, 管控措施

Abstract: The evolution of rocky desertification in Guizhou has curbed the ecological security demands of the Yangtze River and Pearl River Basins. In response to the national ecological environment protection and restoration policies, aiming at strengthening the upper reaches of the Yangtze River ecological protection work to curb the deterioration of ecological environment in Guizhou Province, this study established sensitivity evaluation index system and the evaluation model to evaluate the sensitivity of rocky desertification in Guizhou province by the remote sensing and GIS technology, according to the guideline of ecological red line delimitation technology guide (2015.06) and the typical ecological environmental problems of karst rocky desertification in Guizhou Province. The ecological red line of sensitive area of rocky desertification was defined, and the ecological red line of rocky desertification sensitive area in Guizhou Province was quantitatively revealed and the law of regional differentiation was put forward. And the concrete control measures were put forward according to the actual situation of rocky desertification control in Guizhou Province. The results showed that:(1) In 2011, the susceptibility of rocky desertification in Guizhou province is 36227.83 km2, which accounts for 32.23% of the total area of karst landforms, and the distribution of the total distribution is striped. (2) The spatial distribution of the rocky desertification sensitive area is related to the rocky desertification. There was a positive correlation between the proportion of land and the proportion of the above sensitive areas when excluding non-obvious rocky desertification, potential rocky desertification, insensitive area and mild sensitive area. (3) The ecological red line area in the rocky desertification sensitive area of Guizhou Province is 6814.25 km2, accounting for 3.87% of the total land area of the whole province. It is mainly composed of broken patches, which are concentrated in the northern, southern and western regions of Guizhou. (4) The control measures of ecological red line in the rocky desertification sensitive area should be parallel to the control and protection, mainly in the protection, and at the same time strengthen the comprehensive control of the rocky desertification sensitive area and the ecological protection policy system.

Key words: ecological red line, rocky desertification sensitive area, spatial variation, control measures

中图分类号: 

  • X171.1
[1] 刘军会,高吉喜,马苏,等.中国生态环境敏感区评价[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1607-1616.[LIU J H,GAO J X,MA S,et al.Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in China[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(10):1607-1616.]
[2] 杨邦杰,高吉喜,邹长新.划定生态保护红线的战略意义[J].中国发展,2014,14(1):1-4.[YANG B J,GAO J X,ZOU C X.The strategic significance of drawing the ecological protection red line[J].China Development,2014,14(1):1-4.]
[3] 高吉喜,邹长新,王丽霞.划定生态保护红线深化环境影响评价[J].环境影响评价,2014,(4):11-15.
[4] 高吉喜,邹长新,杨兆平,等.划定生态红线保障生态安全[N].中国环境报,2012-10-18.
[5] 梁学功,樊春燕.贯彻生态文明理念做好环境影响评价与评估[J].三峡环境与生态,2013,35(2):1-2.
[6] 安宏锋,安裕伦,袁士聪,等.贵州省石漠化敏感性的动态演变与模拟预测[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(13):388-395.[AN H F,AN Y L,YUAN S C,et al.The dynamic change and simulation and prediction of sensitivity of the karst rocky desertification of Guizhou[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2010,26(13):388-395.]
[7] 肖荣波,欧阳志云,王效科,等.中国西南地区石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(5):551-554.[XIAO R B,OUYANG Z Y,WANG X K,et al.Sensitivity of rocky desertification and its spatial distribution in southwestern China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2005,24(5):551-554.]
[8] 赖长鸿,覃家作,张文,等.四川省石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分布特征[J].水土保持研究.2013,20(4):99-104.[LAI C H,QIN J Z,ZHANG W,et al.Assessment on sensitivity and spatial distributed characteristics of karst rocky desertification in Sichuan province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(4):99-104.]
[9] 刘春霞,李月臣,杨华.三峡库区(重庆段)石漠化敏感性评价及空间分异特征[J].长江流域资源与环境.2011,20(3):291-297.[LIU C X,LI Y C,YANG H.Sensitivity assessment of karst rocky desertification in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing and its spatial differentiation characteristics[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2011,20(3):291-297.]
[10] 凡非得,王克林,宣勇,等.西南喀斯特区域生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].长江流域资源与环境.2011,20(11):1394-1399.[FAN F D,WANG K L,XUAN Y,et al.Eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial distribution in Karst Regions,Southwest China[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2011,20(11):1394-1399.]
[11] 熊康宁,黎平,周忠发,等.喀斯特石漠化的遥感-GIS典型研究-以贵州省为例[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:17-28.
[12] 高贵龙,邓自民,熊康宁,等.喀斯特的呼唤与希望——贵州喀斯特生态环境建设与可持续发展[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2003:27-66.
[13] 蓝安军,熊康宁,安裕伦.喀斯特石漠化的驱动因子分析——以贵州省为例[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(6):19-23.[LAN A J,XIONG K N,AN Y L.Analysis on driving factors of karst rock-desertification-with a special reference to Guizhou Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,21(6):19-23.]
[14] 刘智慧,周忠发,郭宾.贵州省重点生态功能区生态敏感性评价[J].生态科学,2014,33(6):1135-1141.[LIU Z H,ZHOU Z F,GUO B.Ecological sensitivity evaluation of significant eco-function areas in Guizhou Province[J].Ecological Science,2014,33(6):1135-1141.]
[15] 贵州概况[EB/OL].(2011-10-31).http://gz.zwbk.org/MyLemmaShow.aspx?lid=1035#5.
[16] 环境保护部.生态保护红线划定技术指南[Z].北京:环境保护部,2015.
[17] 汤国安,李发源,刘学军.数字高程模型教程[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2010:147-148.
[18] 燕守广,林乃峰,沈渭寿.江苏省生态红线区域划分与保护[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(3):294-299.[YAN S G,LIN N F,SHEN W S.Delineation and protection of ecological red lines in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2014,30(3):294-299.]
[1] 樊敏, 郭亚琳, 李富程, 王青. 岷江上游植被生境适应性空间分异格局的间隙度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1078-1085.
[2] 李小帆, 邓宏兵. 长江经济带新型城镇化协调性的空间差异与时空演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 725-732.
[3] 谢志祥, 任世鑫, 李阳, 刘静玉. 长江中游城市群城市效率水平测度及空间分异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1705-1710.
[4] 李仕川, 郭欢欢, 侯鹰, 张孝成, 庞静. 土地集约利用空间分异研究中指标标准化方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1771-1778.
[5] 杨世凡, 安裕伦, 王培彬, 马良瑞, 胡锋, 孙泉忠. 贵州赤水河流域生态红线区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1405-1411.
[6] 韩书成, 濮励杰. 基于供给约束与需求的土地开发适宜性空间分异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 262-.
[7] 赵 健, 毕春娟, 陈振楼. 长江口潮滩沉积物中活性重金属的空间分异及控制机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1020-.
[8] 韩书成,濮励杰,. 江苏土地利用综合效益空间分异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(6): 853-853.
[9] 张昆,田昆,徐守国. 水生植物对剑湖湿地水体N|P营养空间分异的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 57-60.
[10] 万荣荣, 杨桂山. 太湖流域土地利用变化及其空间分异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 298-302.
[11] 彭 建,蒋依依,李正国,张小飞,李卫锋,岳 隽. 快速城市化地区土地利用效益评价——以南京市江宁区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 304-309.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[2] 王玉蓉,李嘉| 李克锋,芮建良. 雅砻江锦屏二级水电站减水河段生态需水量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 81 -85 .
[3] 唐 琦,虞孝感. 长江三角洲地区经济可持续发展问题初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 269 -273 .
[4] 王海云,高太忠,高京,黄群贤. 基于AHPLP法的南水北调中线水资源优化配置[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 588 .
[5] 王宜虎. 江苏沿江各市工业绿色化程度的模糊评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 170 .
[6] 张 燕, 张 洪, 彭补拙. 土地资源、环境与经济发展的协调性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 529 .
[7] 黄锡生,唐绍均. 三峡库区环境安全保护法律实施机制探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 611 -615 .
[8] 张孝飞,林玉锁,俞 飞,李 波. 城市典型工业区土壤重金属污染状况研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 512 -515 .
[9] 廖富强,刘 影, 叶慕亚,郑 林. 鄱阳湖典型湿地生态环境脆弱性评价及压力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 133 .
[10] 赵姚阳,濮励杰,胡晓添. BP神经网络在城市建成区面积预测中的应用——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 14 -18 .