不同密度螺-草结构对养殖尾水净化效果的比较研究

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (2): 173-.

不同密度螺-草结构对养殖尾水净化效果的比较研究

周露洪,谷孝鸿,曾庆飞,毛志刚,高华梅

(1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所湖泊与环境国家重点实验室|江苏南京 210008|2.中国科学院研究生院|北京 100049)

出版日期:2011-02-20

COMPARATIVE PURIFICATION EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DENSITIESOF SNAILS AND MACROPHYTES ON AQUACULTURE WASTEWATER

ZHOU Luhong1,2|GU Xiaohong1|ZENG Qingfei1|MAO Zhigang1,2|GAO Huamei1,2

(1.State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment,Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology,Chinese Academy ofSciences,Nanjing 210008,China;2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)〖

Online:2011-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为减少水产养殖污染物排放，以苦草为对照组，构建环棱螺螺草生态系统净化池塘养殖尾水，比较不同密度螺草结构对养殖尾水的净化效果，同时探讨螺草互作对水质的影响。结果表明不同密度螺草组合对养殖尾水均有较好的净化效果，以中密度组（螺密度50 ind/m3）的去除效果最优，25 d对Chla、CODMn、TN、TP、NH4+N、NO3-N和浊度的去除率分别达到98%、39.7%、44.2%、86.9%、58.2%、82.3%和91%，其中以17~25 d的营养物质去除率最高，水质由原来的Ⅳ类、Ⅴ类水提升为Ⅲ类水；环棱螺苦草互作对水体的净化效果与苦草对照组差异不显著，表明其互利关系不明显；环棱螺苦草组合对CODMn和TN的去除效果不是很理想，可能是由于实验中以黄土为底泥，其中的异养微生物较少引起的

Abstract:

In order to reduce the aquaculture wastewater,this paper discussed the effect on water quality by the snail(Bellamya purifica)and macrophyte(Vallisneria spiralis)through constructing the snail and macrophyte ecological system and comparing the purification effects by the snail and macrophtye with different density.The result showed that all the snail and macrophyte treatments of various density had good purification effects,but by contrast,the middle density one(50ind/m3)worked best.The removal rates of Chla,CODMn,TN, TP,NH4+N,NO3-N and the turbidity were 98%,397%,442%,869%,582%,823% and 91%,respectively in the 25 days’experiment,among which the 17~25 days’nutrient had the highest removal rate.And the water quality had evolved from the level of Ⅳ and Ⅴ to Ⅲ.Since there was only a slight difference in purification between the Bellamya purifica and Vallisneria spiralis,the mutually beneficial relationship between them was not obvious.However,perhaps due to the loess sediment caused by the shortage of heterotrophic microorganism,the removal effect of CODMn and TN by 〖WTBX〗Bellamya purifica and Vallisneria spiralis was not perfect

周露洪, 谷孝鸿, 曾庆飞, 毛志刚, 高华梅. 不同密度螺-草结构对养殖尾水净化效果的比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(2): 173-.

ZHOU Lou-Hong, GU Xiao-Hong, CENG Qiang-Fei, MAO Zhi-Gang, GAO Hua-Mei. COMPARATIVE PURIFICATION EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DENSITIESOF SNAILS AND MACROPHYTES ON AQUACULTURE WASTEWATER[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2011, 20(2): 173-.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张政, 付融冰\| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2]	许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3]	郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[4]	刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[5]	陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[6]	胡大伟,卞新民,许泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[7]	张洁\| 张志斌\| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[8]	翁君山,段宁\| 张颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[9]	邹小兵,曾婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[10]	王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .