RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 249-256.doi: 11870/cjlyzyyhj201602010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SUPERVISION AND MAINTENANCE OF RURAL LAND CONSOLIDATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF STRUCTURE-CONDUCT-PERFORMANCE

ZHAO Wei1, WU Shi-man1,2   

  1. 1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. College of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
  • Received:2015-05-13 Revised:2015-08-26 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China, (NO. 71403094)

Abstract: The behavior of supervision and maintenance was an importance guarantee for basic function of rural land consolidation. The essential implication for supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidation was discussed, as the premise of performance evaluation system development, from the view of peasants' satisfaction degree. Then Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm was introduced from neo-institutional economics fields to help establish a theoretical framework of organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance for rural land consolidation. The empirical study was carried out after the field investigation both in Huanggaihu Farm in Chibi and Panjiawan Town in Jiayu, Hubei Province. The results were calculated by satisfaction degree and index weight, which was a linear combination value by subjective weight and objective weight. Afterwards, the supposed logic relationship among organization structure, public participation conduce, supervision and maintenance performance were examined by using collected data to explore the former two factors' influence on the later one. The main study results were as follows. Performance value of supervision and maintenance of rural land consolidationwas near to middle level, and the difference between Huanggaihu and Panjiawan was statistical significant. For all samples, several variables were significant factors, such as sustainable and improvement of organization structure, finance funding, public participation, and so on. The regression equations also explained that the enterprise management of Huanggaihu Farm, the governance reform and finance support of Panjiawan, were the chief reason of performance difference between two districts. The study results verified the effectiveness of Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm, and were useful for performance improving.

Key words: rural land consolidation, supervision and maintenance, performance, Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm, satisfaction degree

CLC Number: 

  • S-36
[1] 王瑷玲, 胡继连, 刘文鹏, 等. 基于土地整理的耕地经济价值评定及其变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9):296-300.[WANG A L, HU J L, LIU W P, et al. Evaluation and change of arable land economic value based on land consolidation[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(9):296-300.]
[2] 谷晓坤, 刘娟. 都市观光农业型土地整治项目的社会效应评价——以上海市合庆镇项目为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(8):1549-1554.[GU X K, LIU J. Evaluation of the social effects of urban sightseeing agricultural land remediation projects[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(8):1549-1554.]
[3] 金晓斌, 周寅康, 李学瑞, 等. 中部土地整理区土地整理投入产出效率评价[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(7):1198-1206.[JIN X B, ZHOU Y K, LI X R, et al. The input-output efficiency evaluation of land consolidation in central land consolidation region[J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(7):1198-1206.]
[4] 杨钢桥, 陈梦华, 汪文雄. 基于价值链的农地整治项目选址阶段效率测度模型研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 12(2):83-88.[YANG G Q, CHEN M H, WANG W X. A value-chain-based study on the efficiency evaluation model of farmland renovation projects location[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 12(2):83-88.]
[5] LISEC A, PRIMOŽIČ T, FERLAN M, et al. Land owners' perception of land consolidation and their satisfaction with the results-Slovenian experiences[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 38:550-563.
[6] 何一鸣, 罗必良. 产权管制、制度行为与经济绩效——来自中国农业经济体制转轨的证据(1958~2005年)[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010, (10):14-15.
[7] 罗文斌, 吴次芳, 倪尧, 等. 基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(8):68-74.[LUO W B, WU C F, NI Y, et al. Research on performance evaluation of land consolation projects and its difference features based on satisfaction of peasant households survey in east, central and western regions in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(8):68-74.]
[8] 严立冬, 麦瑜翔, 潘志翔, 等. 农地整治项目农户满意度及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6):1143-1151.[YAN L D, MAI Y X, PAN Z X, et al. Research on family satisfaction with rural land renovation projects[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(6):1143-1151.]
[9] 王佃利, 刘保军. 公民满意度与公共服务绩效相关性问题的再审视[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, (1):109-114.[WANG D L, LIU B J. Revisiting the linkage between citizen satisfaction and public service performance[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2012, (1):109-114.]
[10] 张以晨, 佴磊, 孟凡奇, 等. 基于最优组合赋权理论的可拓学评价模型的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2011, 41(4):1110-1115.[ZHANG Y C, NAI L, MENG F Q, et al. Application of extension theory evaluation model based on optimal combination weighting law[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(4):1110-1115.]
[11] 丁勇, 梁昌勇, 朱俊红, 等. 群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(5):165-170.[DING Y, LIANG C Y, ZHU J H, et al. A subjective and objective weights integrated method based on 2-tuple linguistic for group decision making[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010, 18(5):165-170.]
[12] 道格拉斯·C. 诺思. 制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M]. 杭行, 译. 上海:格致出版社, 2008.
[1] GAI Hao, YAN Tingwu, HE Ke, ZHANG Junbiao, . A Evaluation of Mechanized Straw Returning Service Performance and Its Obstacle Indicators Based on Famers’Perspective:Based on the Investigation of Hebei, Shandong, Anhui and Hubei Provinces in Four Provinces [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2597-2608.
[2] ZHOU Hui, ZHAO Wei, WANG Feiteng. Influence Path and Mediating Effect of Performance of Supervision and Maintenance Institution for Rural Land Consolidation [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2018, 27(11): 2629-2639.
[3] LUO Wen-bin, MENG Bei, ZHONG Cheng. EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RURAL LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS——TAKING 48 NATIONAL PROJECTS IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(02): 180-189.
[4] WEN Gao-hui, YANG Gang-qiao, ZHAO Wei, WU Shi-man. EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON FARMERS' COMPENSATION AMOUNT FOR THE LOSS OF CULTIVATED LAND IN RURAL LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS: BASED ON CULTIVATED LAND RESOURCE VALUE AND FARMERS' WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT DUAL PERSPECTIVE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(08): 1292-1298.
[5] LONG Liang-jun, WANG Xia, GUO Bing. EVALUATION ON SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL WELLBEING PERFORMANCE——A CASE STUDY OF SHANGHAI [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(01): 9-15.
[6] KAN Ping,LI Chongming,LV Pingyu,ZHANG Sheng,ZHANG Yong. EVALUATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PHOSPHORUS RESTRICTION IN ETERGENTS IN CHONGQING CITY [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 62-65.
[7] LI Yan,HEN Wen. ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN EDGE AREA BETWEEN JIANGSU AND SHANGHAI——CASES OF NANTONG AND SUZHOU [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(2): 139-144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Na,XU You-peng,CHEN Shuang. INFLUENCE OF URBANIZATION ON PRECIPITATION IN SUZHOU CITY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] ZHANG Zheng, FU Rongbing, YANG Haizhen, GU Guowei. COMPARISON OF ORGANIC MATTER REMOVAL IN SUBSURFACE |HORIZONTAL FLOW WETLANDS BASED ON WATER BUDGET [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] SUN Weixia, ZHAO Yongcun, HUANG Biao, LIAO Jingjing, WANG Zhigang, WANG Hongjie. SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SELENIUM IN SOIL ENVIRONMENT AND  ITS CORRELATION WITH HUMAN HEALTH IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA OF CHINA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] XU Su-fang, ZHOU Yin-kang. EVALUATION ON THE SUSTAINABILITY IN LAND USE OF DEVELOPMENT ZONE——A CASE STUDY IN WUHU ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] HAO Hanzhou,JIN Menggui,CAO Lijing,XIE Xianjun. APPLICATION OF FUZZY MATHEMATICS IN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] LIU Yao-bin,LI Ren-dong. ANALYSIS ON REGIONAL DISPARITY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN HUBEI PROVINCE FROM 1994 TO 2000[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] CHEN Yong-bo. EFFECT OF THE THREE-GORGE PROJECT(TGP) ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] SHI Lian-qiang, LI Jiu-fa, YING Ming, ZUO Shu-hua, XU Hai-gen. EVOLUTIONAL PROCESS IN MEIMAOSHA OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ESTUARY AND ITS RESPONSE TO RESERVOIR PROJECT[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] WENG Junshan, DUAN Ning,ZHANG Ying. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC PARTICLES IN SHUANGQIAO FARM, JIAXING CITY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] WANG Shu-guo-,|DUAN Xue-jun-,YAO Shi-mou. EVOLUTIONARY CHARACTERISTICS AND DRIVING MECHANISM OF POPULATION DISTRIBUTION IN YANGTZE RIVER DELTA AREA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(4): 405 .