RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 300-306.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201602016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A STUDY ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT'S DYNAMIC CHANGE AND INFLUENCE FACTORS IN THE PROGRESS OF NEW PATTERN URBANIZATION: A CASE OF ANHUI PROVINCE

HU Xue-ping, LI Dan-qing   

  1. Economics School, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
  • Received:2015-05-13 Revised:2015-08-13 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    the National Social Science Foundation (14BJL065)

Abstract: The rapid development of urbanization brought about serious resources and ecological problems. From 1995 to 2013, Anhui province experienced fast urbanization. The urbanization rate rose from 17.4% in 1995 to 47.9% in 2013, totally rising 30%. Especially from 2005 to 2013, the average annual increase rate of urbanization was 1.6%, higher than the national average value of 1.3%. With the case of Anhui province, this paper studied the development path of new pattern urbanization from the perspective of ecological footprint. Firstly, it calculated ecological footprint from 1995 to 2013 of Anhui province, then discussed its dynamic change, lastly analysed factors affecting ecological footprint. Results showed that the per capital ecological footprint of Anhui province was increasing year by year. From 1995 to 2013, it increased from 0.888 3 hm2 per capital to 2.445 7 hm2 per capital, annually growing 7.62% on average. While the ecological deficit of Anhui Province was also increasing yearly from 1995 to 2013, up from 0.410 6 hm2 per capita in 1995 to 1.722 1 hm2 per capital, rising more than 3 times. The size and the amount of increase of six categories of land were different. The size of per capital ecological footprint, fossil land's ecological footprint accounted for more than a half, the second was arable land, and others' ecological footprint was relatively small. From the perspective of the amount of increase, the ecological footprint of grassland increased fastest, from 0.013 2 hm2 per capital to 0.085 5 hm2 per capital in 2013, almost growing 6 times. The building land's ecological footprint had risen more than 4 times, from 0.001 4 hm2 per capita in 1995 to 0.007 2 hm2 per capital. The ecological footprint of forest land, water area and fossil land have risen about twice. While the arable land's ecological footprint has been stable during 1995 to 2013, maintaining 0.32 hm2 per capital. These data showed that the urbanization of Anhui province was not sustainable. Demographic factors, technical factors and economic factors affect ecological footprint significantly. Among them, technology progress inhibited the increasing of ecological footprint. Results showed that if ecological footprint intensity grew 1 unit, the ecological footprint would decrease 0.078 9 units. It indicated that enhancing the efficiency of resource usage can reduce the impact of economic activities on the ecological environment. The growth of population brought about the growing of ecological footprint. If population grew 10 thousand, the per capital ecological footprint would increase 0.013 5 hm2. In theory, the improvement of population quality decreased the ecological footprint, and can also increase the ecological footprint by causing more consumption. So the empirical analysis demonstrated that consumption matters more than population quality. As to economics factors, there was positive correlation between urbanization rate and ecological footprint. Among factors selected in this paper, urbanization rate has the greatest influence on ecological footprint. If urbanization rate increase every 1%, the per capital ecological footprint will rise 0.210 5 hm2. And the development of three main industries increased the ecological footprint. In details, the output of primary industry, secondary industry and tertiary industry growing 1 unit would respectively cause ecological footprint up 0.098 7 units, 0.103 1 units and 0.055 8 units. From this result, we can conclude that the development of the secondary industry has the greatest to ecological footprint, the second was the primary industry, and the last was the tertiary industry. Consumption caused increasing ecological footprint. Urban residents' consumption played a slightly greater role on ecological footprint than rural residents'. The consumption of urban resident and rural resident rising 1 unit brings about per capital ecological footprint increasing 0.167 3 units and 0.158 2 units respectively. Finally, according to the analysis, appropriate countermeasures were proposed to reduce ecological and promote sustainable development of new pattern urbanization in the future, such as preventing urbanization from developing too fast; implementing "compact type" urbanization development strategy; utilizing technology innovation to promote the efficiency of energy use and promote industrial upgrading; and advocating green life-styles.

Key words: urbanization, ecological footprint (EF), dynamic change, influence factors

CLC Number: 

  • K902
[1] 章茹, 蒋元勇, 万金保, 等. 城镇化过程对鄱阳湖流域生态系统的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(3):400-406.[ZHANG R, JIANG Y Y, WAN J B, et al. Effect of urbanization on the ecosystem of Poyang Lake[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(3):400-406.]
[2] 景杰. 人口城镇化进程中的生态风险防范[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2015(7):76-77, 80.
[3] 梁玉磊, 胡雪萍. 城市化对我国区域生态足迹的影响研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2015(3):25-29, 46.[LIANG Y L, HU X P. Research on the impact of urbanization on regional ecological footprint[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2015(3):25-29, 46.]
[4] 周锐, 胡远满, 王新军, 等. 快速城镇化地区生态用地演变及驱动力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(6):1012-1020.[ZHOU R, HU Y M, WANG X J, et al. Change characteristics of ecological land and its driving factors in rapidly urbanizing region[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(6):1012-1020.]
[5] REES W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.
[6] WACKERNAGEL M, REES W E. Our ecological footprint:reducing human impact on the earth[M]. Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers, 1996.
[7] WACKERNAGEL M, ONISTO L, BELLO P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3):375-390.
[8] 姜绵峰, 叶春明. 上海城市生态足迹动态研究——基于ARIMA模型[J]. 华东经济管理, 2015, 29(1):18-24.[JIANG M F, YE C M. A dynamic research on Shanghai urban ecological footprint-based on the ARIMA model[J]. East China Economic Management, 2015, 29(1):18-24.]
[9] 魏燕, 蒲佐毅. 城市化对区域生态安全的影响——基于VAR模型的实证分析[J]. 城市问题, 2012(6):17-23.[WEI Y, PU Z Y. The influence of urbanization process on regional ecological security:an empirical study based on the VAR model[J]. Urban Problems, 2012(6):17-23.]
[10] 张佳琦, 段玉山, 伍燕南. 基于生态足迹的苏州市可持续发展动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(2):177-184.[ZHANG J Q, DUAN Y S, WU Y N. Dynamic analysis of sustainable development in Suzhou on ecological footprint[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(2):177-184.]
[11] WANG C C, YANG Y S, ZHANG Y Q. Economic development, rural livelihoods, and ecological restoration:evidence from China[J]. AMBIO, 2011, 40(1):78-87.
[12] HOLDEN E. Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form[J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2004, 19(1):91-109.
[13] ERB K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926-2000:a variation on ecological footprint assessments[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1):6-10
[14] LAMMERS A, MOLES R, WALSH C, et al. Ireland's footprint:a time series for 1983-2001[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008, 25(1):53-58.
[15] 王立群, 李冰, 郭轲. 北京市生态足迹变化及其社会经济驱动因子分析[J]. 城市问题, 2014(7):2-8.[WANG L Q, LI B, GUO K. Ecological footprint change of Beijing and its social and economic driving factors[J]. Urban Problems, 2014(7):2-8.]
[16] 林黎阳, 许丽忠. 福建省生态足迹驱动因子分析[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 30(4):96-102.[LIN L Y, XU L Z. Analysis on driving factors of ecological footprint in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 30(4):96-102.]
[17] 胡美娟, 周年兴, 李在军, 等. 南京市三维生态足迹测算及驱动因子[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2015, 31(1):91-95.[HU M J, ZHOU N X, LI Z J, et al. Calculation and driving factor analysis of three-dimensional ecological footprint in Nanjing city[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2015, 31(1):91-95.]
[18] 张学勤, 陈成忠, 林振山. 中国生态足迹的多尺度变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(10):2005-2011.[ZHANG X Q, CHEN C Z, LIN Z S. A study on driving forces of per capital ecological footprint at multiple timescales in China during the period 1953-2007[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(10):2005-2011.]
[19] 中国环境与发展国际合作委员会, 世界自然基金会. 中国生态足迹报告2012:消费、生产与可持续发展[R]. 北京:世界自然基金会, 2012.
[20] 王惠文, 吴载斌, 孟洁. 偏最小二乘回归的线性与非线性方法[M]. 北京:国防出版社, 2006.
[21] YORK R, ROSA E A, DIETZ T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT:analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3):351-365.
[22] VOYER R A, PESCH C, GARBER J, et al. New Bedford, Massachusetts:a story of urbanization and ecological connections[J]. Environmental History, 2000, 5(3):352-377.
[1] ZHOU Feng, LV Hui-hua, XU You-peng. CHANGE OF RIVER STRUCTURE AND RIVER NETWORK CONNECTIVITY IN THE PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(03): 402-409.
[2] PENG Xia, GUO Bing-yao, WEI Ning, SHE Qian-nan, LIU Min, XIANG Wei-ning. CHARACTERISTICS OF EXTREME HEAT EVENTS VARIATIONS AND THEIR RESPONSE TO URBANIZATION IN YANGTZE RIVER DELTA REGION IN RECENT SIXTY YEARS [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(12): 1917-1926.
[3] LIU Hai, YIN Jie, CHEN Jing, CHEN Xiao-ling. DYNAMIC CHANGE AND CASUE OF WATER AREA IN DANJIANGKOU RESERVOIR BASED ON REMOTE SENSING IMAGE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(11): 1759-1766.
[4] ZANG Yu-zhu, LIN Chen, JIN Zhi-feng, FANG Fei, ZHOU Sheng-lu. RESEARCH ON THE DYNAMIC CHANGE OF ABSORBED PHOSPHORUS LOAD UNDER LAND USE CHANGE BACKGROUND IN THE COASTAL AREAS [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(07): 1093-1102.
[5] ZHANG Yu, CAO Wei-dong, LIANG Shuang-bo, HU Yan-yan. RESEARCH ON THE CO-EVOLUTION TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL PATTERNSOF URBANIZATION IN YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(05): 715-724.
[6] LI Xiao-fan, DENG Hong-bing. STUDY OF THE SPATIAL DEFFERENTIATION AND SPATIAL TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF THE COORDINATION OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT'S NEW URBANIZATION [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(05): 725-732.
[7] REN Ping, HONG Bu-ting, ZHOU Jie-ming. RESEARCH OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL PATTERN AND CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF RURAL SETTLEMENTS BASED ON SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION MODEL [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(12): 1993-2002.
[8] HU Zhen-peng, HUANG Xiao-xing, FU Chun, YU Da-jin. THE QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON AND EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS ON INTERACTIVE COUPLING AMONG TOURISM,URBANIZATION AND ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT IN POYANG LAKE AREA [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(12): 2012-2020.
[9] ZHOU Feng, LV Hui-hua, XU You-peng. CHANGES OF UNDERLYING SURFACE AND THEIR INFLUENCES ON STORAGE CAPACITY AND FLOOD IN THE PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(12): 2094-2099.
[10] HUANG Ya-lin, DING Lei, ZHANG Ran, LIU Chao, ZENG Ke-feng. INVESTIGATION THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBANIZATION AND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY: A CASE STUDY OF WUHAN URBAN AGGLOMERATION [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(12): 2117-2124.
[11] ZHAO Bing, WEI Wei, GUO Li-qiao, LI Lu-lu. STUDY ON THE BIOTOPE MAPPING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN URBAN-RURAL ——A CASE STUDY ON HUAQIAO IN SUZHOU CITY [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(11): 1805-1812.
[12] GONG Yuan, LI Fei-xue, HONG Wu-yang, WANG Li-yan, HUANG Qiu-hao, LI Man-chun, JIANG Peng-hui. DYNAMIC CHANGE ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION LAND UNDER THE RESTRICTION OF REGIONAL SPACE CONTROL ——TAKING CHANGZHOU CITY FOR EXAMPLE [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(11): 1813-1818.
[13] JIAO Li-min, ZHANG Xin. CHARACTERIZING URBAN EXPANSION OF MAIN METROPOLISES IN CHINA BASED ON BUILT-UP DENSITIES IN CONCENTRIC RINGS [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(10): 1721-1728.
[14] ZHU Xi-yang, PAN Chen, LIU Min, YANG Fang, JIA Wen-xiao, XIANG Wei-ning. Spatial characteristics of near surface CO2 concentration and analysis on its influencing factors in spring in shanghai city [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(09): 1443-1450.
[15] JIANG Jin-liang, ZHOU Liang, WU Wen-jia, SUN Dong-qi, XU Jiang-gang. A comparative study on spatiotemporal characteristics of urban expansion for the central cities along the yangtze river——a case study of nanjing, wuhan and chongqing [J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(09): 1528-1536.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Yong,CHEN Guo-jie,YANG Ding-guo. DISTRIBUTION OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS IN THE UPSTREAMMINJIANG RIVER AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS]——A CASE STUDY OF LIXIAN COUNTY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(1): 72 -77 .
[2] CHEN Zheng-hong,WAN Su-qin,MAO Yi-wei. ANALYSIS OF THE TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL IN COMPLICATED TOPOGRAPHY AROUND THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR AREA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(5): 623 -627 .
[3] ZHANG Lei,DONG Lixin,WU Bingfang,ZHOU Wancun. LAND COVER CHANGE BEFORE AND AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE GORGES RESERVOIR WITHIN 10 YEARS[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(1): 107 -112 .
[4] YU Na,CHEN Liqiao,ZHAO Quanhong. ON ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS OF OSTRACODS IN TAI LAKE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[5] KONG Lingqiang. PRIMARY EXPLORATION TO THE SHAREHOLDER RESETTLEMENT MODE FOR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT IMMIGRANTS[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(2): 185 .
[6] YANG Xuan. TYPICAL FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC WATER MANAGEMENT PATTERNS AND THEIR REFERENTIAL VALUE TOWATER MANAGEMENT IN WUHAN CITY[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[7] YU Su-jun, ZHANG Ji, XIA Yong-qiu. DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING METHOD FOR LAND SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION BASED ON GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2006, 15(2): 180 -184 .
[8] LI Heng-peng,YANG Gui-shan,LIU Xiao-mei,WAN Rong-rong. THE LONGTERM HYDROLOGIC IMPACTS OF LANDUSE CHANGE ANDMANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR LIHE WATERSHED OF TAIHU BASIN[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[9] LIAO Shun-bao, LI Ze-hui. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND LAND USE AND SPATIALIZATION OF POPULATION CENSUS DATA[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[10] DONG Linshui, ZHANG Xudong, ZHOU Jinxing, LI Dongxue. SPECIES RICHNESS AND VEGETATION COVERAGE OF TRANSECTS ALONG THE QINGHAITIBET RAILWAY IN THE TIBET PLATEAU[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(4): 551 .