长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (07): 944-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201407008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖南省四水流域水沙周期特征及其影响因素分析

胡光伟,毛德华,张旺,许滢,张明   

  1. (1.湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081; 2.湖南工业大学,湖南 株洲 412008; 3.湖南省国土资源规划院,湖南 长沙 410007)
  • 出版日期:2014-07-20

CYCLE CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS IMPACT FACTOR ANALYSIS OF WATER AND SEDIMENT OF FOUR WATER BASIN IN HUNAN  PROVINCE 

HU Guangwei1,3, MAO Dehua1, ZHANG Wang2, XU Ying2, ZHANG Ming3   

  1. (1.College of Resources and Environment Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China; 2. College of Science And Technology, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412008, China; 3. Hunan Planning Institute of Land Resources, Changsha  410007, China
  • Online:2014-07-20

摘要:

采用复小波变换和MK非参数检验的方法分析了湖南省四水流域主要控制站1951~2011年径流量与输沙量周期规律和突变特征。结果表明:(1)湖南四水径流量存在多个波动增加和波动减少的波动变化现象,但无显著变化趋势;而输沙量虽然有一定的波动,但总体上呈波动减少变化态势,而且下降趋势较显著;(2)湘潭站、桃江站和桃源站径流量和输沙量存在20~25 a的第一主周期,而石门站径流量和输沙量的第一主周期不具有一致性,径流量主周期为2 a,输沙量主周期为13 a,但其径流量和输沙量第二、三主周期变化规律相吻合,均为3~5 a的周期;(3)大量的水利工程建设是导致输沙量减少的主要原因,径流量的变化与降水的变化规律较为一致

Abstract:

Based on the annual runoff and sediment load data observed at four hydrological control station of Four Water basin (Xiang River, Zi River, Yuan River and Li River) in Hunan province from 1951 to 2011 of four representative gauging stations (Xiangtan, Taojiang, Taoyuan, Shimen), the Periodic regularity and characteristics of mutation of annual runoff and sediment changes fluxes into the Dongting Lake from Four water basin was analyzed using MannKendall trend test, moving average value, Wavelet analysis and double mass analysis. The results show that the annul changes of runoff and sediment was different in a great scope. ①The annual runoff of Four water basin has a plurality wave phenomena of rise and decline, but no significant change. And sediment discharge has certain fluctuation with the overall downward trend, and the downward trend is obvious. The annual runoff is highest in Xiang River(653.7×108 m3), intermediate in Zi River (2269×108 m3)and Yuan River (6362×108 m3), and lowest in Li River (1461×108 m3). The annual sediment is highest in Yuan River(1 003×104 t), intermediate in Xiang River (9389×104 t)and Li River (5299×104 t), and lowest in Zi River (2191×104 t).②The runoff and sediment of Xiangtan Station, Taojiang Station and Taoyuan Station have a primary period of 20-25 years. But the Runoff and sediment of Shimen Station of the first main period is not consistent. Annual runoff and sediment discharge cycles of Xiangtan, Taojiang and Taoyuan is more consistent. Among them, the runoff and sediment discharge in Xiangtan station of Xiangjiang River also has the second main cycle of seven years. And the annual runoff and sediment discharge of Taojiang also exist the periodical characteristics of seven years. The annual runoff and sediment discharge of Taoyuan station also has the main cycle of 14 years and 12 years respectively. But the annual runoff and sediment discharge of Shimen station in the first cycle is not consistent. The runoff has the main period of 2 years, and the sediment discharge has the main cycle of 13 years. Runoff and sediment discharge of Shimen in the second cycle change law is basicly consistent, which is about 3-5 years period. The cycle of the annual sediment discharge lag than the cycle annual runoff 2-3 years. ③The construction of water conservancy project is a major cause of sediment reduction

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[5] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .