长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (04): 697-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201504023

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

1644~1949年长江三角洲地区五种洪涝致灾因子组合特征分析

崔玉娟1, 张玉洁1, 方修琦1*, 叶〓瑜1,2, 张向萍1   

  1. 1.北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875;2.北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2015-04-20

ANALYSIS ON THE COMBINATORIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF 5 FLOODFACTORS DURING 1644-1949 IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA

CUI Yujuan1,ZHANG Yujie1,FANG Xiuqi1,YE Yu1,2,ZHANG Xiangping1   

  1. 1. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Online:2015-04-20

摘要:

为研究洪涝灾害中不同洪涝致灾因子组合特征对灾害的决定作用,基于历史文献资料,对长江三角洲地区1644~1949年五种洪涝致灾因子(简称洪涝因子)——连续降水、台风、潮灾、上游洪水以及强降水——分类辨识并逐年赋值统计,得到1644~1949年长江三角洲逐年洪涝因子总值序列。结果表明:(1)影响洪涝的因子平均为166个,依据洪涝因子总值序列变化趋势,研究时段可划分为三阶段:阶段一,1644~1718年,三因子与四因子洪涝年多集中于这一阶段,该阶段均值高于全段均值与其它两阶段;阶段二,1719~1864年,该段波动较大,单一因子与二因子洪涝年发生频次较高,该段均值最低,其中单一因子洪涝年以强降水因子的影响为最多;阶段三,1865~1949年,大多出现单一因子与二因子洪涝年,整体波动较小,为较平稳的时段。(2)单一因子洪涝年发生频率最大,以强降水因子出现最多,二因子洪涝年发生频率次之,以连续降水-强降水比例最高,三因子洪涝年以连续降水-台风-强降水为最多,四因子洪涝年出现最多的为连续降水—台风—上游洪水—强降水的因子组合,未出现五因子洪涝年。(3)按灾情影响范围辨识了长江三角洲地区1644~1949年6个极端洪涝灾害年和7个极端台风灾害年,发现极端洪涝灾害年主要集中于阶段一中期和阶段二后半期,包括2个四因子年、3个三因子年和1个二因子年,都与连续降水和强降水有关;而极端台风灾害年多发生于阶段二前半期,多为台风与潮灾共同致灾。

Abstract:

The research of historical flood is playing a more and more important role in the risk assessment and prediction in recent years. The research on interactions between flood disasters and flood factors in history could provide analogies for better understanding of the underlying mechanism and impacts of the current and future floods. To investigate the decisive role of different floodfactors interactions on flood hazards, the five types of floodfactors in the Yangtze River Delta during 1644-1949 including continuous rainfall, typhoon, tidal disaster, upstream flood and heavy rainfall were yearly identified and evaluated based on historic documents. And the yearly total floodfactors values sequence was accordingly obtained. The results showed that: (1) The average value of the five floodfactors is 1.66. Among them, 88.56% of the years were shown as a singlefloodfactor years and twofloodfactors years, and only 11.44% of the years were three and fourfloodfactors years. There are no fivefloodfactors year and only 1 zerofloodfactor year occurred. Based on the total sequence of yearly floodfactors, the studied period was divided into three stages. Stage 1 (1644-1718) contained most of the threefloodfactors years and fourfloodfactors years, and the average of the floodfactors in this stage was higher than the mean average of the whole sequence as well as the other two stages; Stage 2 (1719-1864) showed relatively large fluctuation. In this stage, singlefloodfactor years and twofloodfactors years showed higher frequency of flood occurrence. The average of the floodfactors in this stage was the lowest. Heavy rainfall factor was the dominating factor in singlefloodfactors years; Stage 3 (1865-1949) consisted of mostly singlefloodfactor years and twofloodfactors years showed a stable sequence with small fluctuation. (2) The singlefloodfactor years, mostly showing heavy rainfall factor and then continuous rainfall factor, occurred most frequently in the whole period. The frequency of twofloodfactors years was secondly highest, and most of the years exhibited continuous rainfall factor and heavy rainfall factor, followed by continuous rainfall factor and typhoon factor. The combination of continuous rainfall typhoonheavy rainfall factors was most common in threefloodfactors years, followed by continuous rainfalltidal disasterheavy rainfall factor and then continuous rainfalltyphoontidal disaster factor. And the combination of continuous rainfalltyphoonupstream floodheavy rainfall factors interactions mostly appeared in fourfloodfactors years. There was no fivefloodfactors year. (3) Six extreme flood disaster and seven extreme typhoon disaster years in the Yangtze River Delta during 1644-1949 were identified by the disaster influence. Extreme flood disaster years, including 2 fourfloodfactors years, 3 threefloodfactors years and 1 twofloodfactors years, were mostly found in middle of Stage 1 and second half of Stage 2, all associated with continuous rainfall and heavy rainfall. On the other hand, most extreme typhoon disaster years occurred in the first half of Stage 2. Most of them were the results of concurring typhoon and tidal disasters. If occurrence time and intensity vary among the five flood factors, a higher number of flood factors does not necessarily mean that the year is an extreme flood disaster year or an extreme typhoon disaster year.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[2] 曾 辉,,宋立荣,于志刚,陈洪涛. 三峡水库“水华”成因初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 336 .
[3] 梁常德,龙天渝,李继承,刘腊美. 三峡库区非点源氮磷负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 26 -30 .
[4] 叶延琼,陈国阶. GIS支持下的岷江上游流域景观格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 112 -115 .
[5] 屈 璠,刘 敏,侯立军,许世远,刘巧梅,欧冬妮. 潮汐循环影响下上覆水环境因子和氮营养盐的变化及其相关关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 345 .
[6] 黄, 薇, 陈 进, 王 波. 梯级开发对河流径流过程和水温过程均化作用的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 335 .
[7] 陈永柏, 邓 云| 梁瑞峰. 溪洛渡水电站叠梁门取水方式减缓下泄低温水的优化调度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 340 .
[8] 王保畬. 略论建设长江经济带[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 2 .
[9] 罗秉征. 河口及近海的生态特点与渔业资源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 4 .
[10] 刘扬扬, 张行南, 徐双全, 倪斐. 长江口滩涂地形冲淤分析研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1314 .