长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1767-1773.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj2016011016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

乌东德水库坝前段消落带生态类型划分及生态修复模式初探

刘金珍, 樊皓, 阮娅   

  1. 长江水资源保护科学研究所, 湖北 武汉 430051
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-24 修回日期:2016-05-10 出版日期:2016-11-20
  • 作者简介:刘金珍(1984~),女,工程师,硕士研究生,主要从事环境影响评价和环境保护设计工作.E-mail:liujinzhen111@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41301285)

A PRELIMINARY STUDY ON ECOLOGICAL TYPES AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION MODELS IN THE HYDRO-FLUCTUATION BELT OF WUDONGDE RESERVOIR IN FRONT OF DAM

LIU Jin-zhen, FAN Hao, RUAN Ya   

  1. Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan 430051, China
  • Received:2016-03-24 Revised:2016-05-10 Online:2016-11-20
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41301285)

摘要: 采用GIS技术,根据高程、坡度、土壤类型等环境特征,将乌东德水库坝前段消落带分为18种生态类型,并完成了高程图、坡度图和土壤类型图,建立了环境特征和消落带类型的直观联系。然后根据不同的生态类型,提出了4种生态修复模式,并选择了10种植物作为生态修复物种。为其它水库消落带生态修复提供了参考依据。

关键词: 消落带, 生态类型划分, GIS技术, 生态修复

Abstract: Taking elevation, slope and soil types as environmental characteristics, the hydro-fluctuation belt of Wudongde Reservoir in front of dam could be classified into 18 ecological types with a technique of GIS. Elevation, slope and soil maps were drawn, which established direct-viewing relation between environmental characteristics and ecological types. Based on different types, four restoration models were put forward and ten plant species were chosen as restoration species. This paper would provide reference for ecological restoration of hydro-fluctuation belt in other reservoir.

Key words: hydro-fluctuation belt, division of ecological types, GIS technology, ecological restoration

中图分类号: 

  • P343.3
[1] 戴方喜, 许文年, 刘德富, 等. 对构建三峡库区消落带梯度生态修复模式的思考[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006(1):34-36.[DAI F X, XU W N, LIU D F, et al. Consideration on the construction of ecological restoration model with gradient in hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorge Reservoir[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2006(1):34-36.]
[2] 黄世友, 马立辉, 方文, 等.三峡库区消落带植被重建与生态修复技术研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2013, 33(3):74-78.[HUANG S Y, MA L H, FANG W, et al. Study on the reconstruction and ecological restoration techniques of vegetation in hydro-fluctuation belt of the Three Gorge Reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2013, 33(3):74-78.]
[3] 雷波, 杨春华, 杨三明, 等. 基于GIS的长江三峡水库消落带生态类型划分及其特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(8):2082-2090.[LEI B, YANG C H, YANG S M, et al. GIS-based division of ecological types and their characteristics of water-level-fluctuating zone in the Three Gorges Reservoir of Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(8):2082-2090.]
[4] 刘云峰, 刘正学. 三峡水库消落区极限条件下狗牙根适生性试验[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 27(5):661-663.[LIU Y F, LIU Z X. Adaptability test of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. in the ebb and flow zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir under extreme conditions[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2005, 27(5):661-663.]
[5] 李昌晓, 钟章成. 模拟三峡库区消落带土壤水分变化条件下落羽杉与池杉幼苗的光合特性比较[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(6):28-34.[LI C X, ZHONG Z C. Comparative studies on photosynthetic characteristics of taxodium distichum and taxodium ascendens seedlings under simulated soil water change in the hydro-fluctuation belt of Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(6):28-34.]
[6] 陈芳清, 郭成圆, 王传华, 等. 水淹对秋华柳幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(6):1229-1233.[CHEN F Q, GUO C Y, WANG C H, et al. Effects of waterlogging on ecophysiological characteristics of Salix variegate seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(6):1229-1233.]
[7] 张小萍, 曾波, 陈婷, 等. 三峡库区河岸植物野古草(Arundinella anomala var.depauperata Keng)茎通气组织发生对水淹的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4):1864-1871.[ZHANG X P, ZENG B, CHEN T, et al. The effects of flooding on aerenchyma formation in the stem of Arundinella Anomala var. depauperata Keng, a riparian plant in Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4):1864-1871.]
[8] 王海锋, 曾波, 乔普, 等. 长期水淹条件下香根草(Vetiveria zizanioides)、菖蒲(Acorus calamus)和空心莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)的存活及生长响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(6):2571-2580.[WANG H F, ZENG B, QIAO P, et al. Survival and growth response of Vetiveria zizanioides, Acorus Calamus and Alternanthera philoxeroides to long-term submergence[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(6):2571-2580.]
[9] 王海锋, 曾波, 李娅, 等. 完全水淹条件下空心莲子草的生长、存活及出水后的恢复动态研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2008, 26(2):147-152.[WANG H F, ZENG B, LI Y, et al. Effects of submergence on growth, survival and recovery growth of Alternanthera philoxeroides[J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2008, 26(2):147-152.]
[10] 王海锋, 曾波, 李娅, 等. 长期完全水淹对4种三峡库区岸生植物存活及恢复生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5):977-984.[WANG H F, ZENG B, LI Y, et al. Effects of long-term submergence on survival and recovery growth of four riparian plant species in Three Gorges Reservoir region, China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 2008, 32(5):977-984.]
[11] 徐高福, 洪利兴, 陈小勇, 等. 千岛湖区消落带植被恢复初探[J]. 林业调查规划, 2006, 31(6):106-109.[XU G F, HONG L X, CHEN X Y, et al. Preliminary discussion on vegetation regeneration in declined belt of Thousand-isles Lake Area[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2006, 31(6):106-109.]
[12] 夏品华, 林陶, 邓河霞, 等. 贵州红枫湖水库消落带类型划分及其生态修复试验[J]. 中国水土保持, 2011(6):58-60.[XIA P H, LIN T, DENG H X, et al. Classification and ecological restoration test in the hydro-fluctuation belt of Guizhou Hongfeng Lake Reservoir[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2011(6):58-60.]
[13] 杨平. 恢复生态学在隔河岩库区消落带生态修复中的应用[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(4):11-14.[YANG P. Application of restoration ecology to Geheyan Reservoir wet-dry zone ecological restoration[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2011, 33(4):11-14.]
[14] 王勇, 李鹏, 穆军, 等. 金沙江干热河谷水电站库区消落带生态修复对策研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(5):141-144, 148.[WANG Y LI P, MU J, et al. Ecological restoration in Level-fluctuating zone countermeasures of dry-hot valleys reservoirs in the Jinsha River[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(5):141-144, 148.]
[15] 刘裕. 麻疯树幼苗对不同土壤水分状况的响应[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学硕士学位论文, 2009.[LIU Y. The responses of Jatropha curcas L. seedling in different soil moisture[D]. Ya'an:Master Dissertation of Sichuan Agriculture University, 2009.]
[1] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609-2618.
[2] 王彬俨, 严冬春, 文安邦, 陈佳村. 三峡水库干流消落带沉积泥沙粒径特征及其物源意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1421-1429.
[3] 王晓荣, 程瑞梅, 肖文发, 潘磊, 曾立雄. 三峡库区消落带水淹初期主要优势草本植物生态位变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 404-411.
[4] 徐建霞, 彭刚志, 王建柱. 三峡库区香溪河消落带植被多样性及分布格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1345-1350.
[5] 胡 刚 王里奥 袁 辉 包 亮 欧阳鸥. 三峡库区消落带下部区域土壤氮磷释放规律模拟实验研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 780-780.
[6] 季永兴. 上海多自然型河流整治实践与探索[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 264-264.
[7] 季永兴. 上海多自然型河流整治实践与探索[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 264-264.
[8] 王里奥,黄 川,詹艳慧,袁 辉. 三峡库区消落带淹水—落干过程土壤磷吸附—解吸及释放研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 593-597.
[9] 袁 辉,王里奥,詹艳慧,黄 川,胡 刚. 三峡库区消落带健康评价指标体系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 249-253.
[10] 许 川, 舒为群, 曹 佳, 汪 洋. 三峡库区消落带富营养化及其危害预测和防治[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 440-444.
[11] 张 莉,何丙辉,李旭光,张小林. 云南省姚安县水土保持生态修复措施的效益研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 358-361.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .