长江经济带新型城镇化协调性的空间差异与时空演化

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605005

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (05): 725-732.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201605005

长江经济带新型城镇化协调性的空间差异与时空演化

李小帆^1,2, 邓宏兵^1,2

1. 中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074;
2. 湖北省区域创新能力监测与分析软科学研究基地, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2015-09-01 修回日期:2015-11-27 出版日期:2016-05-20
通讯作者: 邓宏兵 E-mail:denghongbing_2005@126.com
作者简介:李小帆(1988~),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为区域经济与城镇化.E-mail:lixiaofa100@126.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(14BSH028)

STUDY OF THE SPATIAL DEFFERENTIATION AND SPATIAL TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF THE COORDINATION OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT'S NEW URBANIZATION

LI Xiao-fan^1,2, DENG Hong-bing^1,2

1. Economic and Management School of China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Monitoring and Analysis of Soft Science Research Base of Regional Innovation Ability of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2015-09-01 Revised:2015-11-27 Online:2016-05-20
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation of China (14BSH028)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从城乡、产城、区域和城镇化与资源环境协调发展4个方面建立指标体系,衡量长江经济带105个地级及以上市新型城镇化的协调性,并运用泰尔系数和探索性空间分析考察协调性的空间差异和时空演化,结果发现:长江经济带新型城镇化协调性存在明显的反地势分布和"城市圈俱乐部"特征;东、中、西部城镇化协调性差异随时间越来越明显,东部城市主要体现在非省会城市之间的差异,中部主要体现在省会城市与非省会城市的组间差异,西部主要体现在省会城市之间以及省会城市和非省会城市之间的组间差异;长江经济带新型城镇化协调性表现出正的全局空间自相关,协调性高的区域开始集聚在一起,这种趋势随时间不断增强并且空间溢出效应明显。

关键词: 长江经济带, 新型城镇化协调性, 空间分异, 时空演化

Abstract: Using the index system made up with the integration of urban and rural areas' development, the coordination of the city and its industry, the balance among different regions, the coupling of the urbanization and the eco-environment, we performed a case study of the coordination of the new urbanization of 105 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. By using the Theil Index and the ESDA methods, we found that, 1. An inverse-topography distribution and an obvious "metropolitan-club" feature were founded. 2. Prominent differences were found between the eastern, mid, and western areas of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and they becomes bigger with time. The main differences in the eastern areas are contributed by the differences of the non-capital cities, the main differences in the mid areas are contributed by the differences between the capital and non-capital cities, the main differences in the western areas are contributed by the differences in the capital cities and the differences between the capital and non-capital cities. 3. A significant positive spatial correlation was found, which means the high coordinated areas turn to gathered, and the trends becomes stronger belong time, at the same time, the space spillover effect was also founded.

Key words: the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the coordination of the new urbanization, spatial differentiation, temporal evolution

中图分类号:

F061.5

李小帆, 邓宏兵. 长江经济带新型城镇化协调性的空间差异与时空演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 725-732.

LI Xiao-fan, DENG Hong-bing. STUDY OF THE SPATIAL DEFFERENTIATION AND SPATIAL TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF THE COORDINATION OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT'S NEW URBANIZATION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(05): 725-732.

参考文献

[1] 李克强. 协调推进城镇化是实现现代化的重大战略选择[J].行政管理改革, 2012(11):4-10.
[2] 李小建, 罗庆. 新型城镇化中的协调思想分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(2):47-53. [LI X J, LUO Q. The coordinating ideas of new-form urbanization[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(2):47-53.]
[3] 孔凡文, 许世卫. 论城镇化速度与质量协调发展[J]. 城市问题, 2005(5):58-61. [KONG F W, XU S W. On the coordinated growth of speed and quality of urbanization[J]. Urban Problems, 2005(5):58-61.]
[4] 于涛方. 从速度到质量:京津冀地区城镇化发展战略思考[J]. 上海城市规划, 2014(1):13-23. [YU T F. From speed to quality:research on the development strategy of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Mega City-regions[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2014(1):13-23.]
[5] 何平, 倪苹. 中国城镇化质量研究[J]. 统计研究, 2013, 30(6):11-18. [HE P, NI P. Study on the quality of China's urbanization[J]. Statistical Research, 2013, 30(6):11-18.]
[6] 张春梅, 张小林, 吴启焰, 等.城镇化质量与城镇化规模的协调性研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(1):16-22. [ZHANG C M, ZHANG X L, WU Q Y, et al. The coordination about quality and scale of urbanization:Case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(1):16-22.]
[7] 陈晓红, 万鲁河. 城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J].地理科学, 2013, 33(12):1450-1457. [CHEN X H, WAN L H. The interactive mechanisms for the coordination and vulnerability between regional urban and eco-environment[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12):1450-1457.]
[8] 赵伟, 何莉. 中国对外贸易发展省际差异及其结构分解[J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(2):187-190, 195. [ZHAO W, HE L. Analysis on the foreign trade development difference among Chinese provinces[J]. Economic Geography, 2007, 27(2):187-190, 195.]
[9] 宣国富, 徐建刚, 赵静. 基于ESDA的城市社会空间研究——以上海市中心城区为例[J].地理科学, 2010, 30(1):22-29. [XUAN G F, XU J G, ZHAO J. An analysis of urban social space based on ESDA——a case study of the central urban district in Shanghai[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(1):22-29.]
[10] 潘竟虎, 尹君. 中国地级及以上城市发展效率差异的DEA-ESDA测度[J].经济地理, 2012, 32(12):53-60. [PAN J H, YIN J. Analysis on the urban development efficiency of cities at prefecture level or above in China based on DEA-ESDA[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(12):53-60.]
[11] 邹琳, 曾刚, 曹贤忠. 基于ESDA的长三角城市群研发投入空间分异特征及时空演化[J].经济地理, 2015, 35(3):73-79. [ZOU L, ZENG G, CAO X Z. The spatial variation and spatial-temporal evolution of R&D input in the Yangtze River Delta City Group——based on ESDA analysis[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 35(3):73-79.]
[12] 李国平, 王春杨. 我国省域创新产出的空间特征和时空演化——基于探索性空间数据分析的实证[J].地理研究, 2012, 31(1):95-106. [LI G P, WANG C Y. Spatial characteristics and dynamic changes of provincial innovation output in China:an investigation using the ESDA[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(1):95-106.]

相关文章 15

[1]	刘云强, 权泉, 朱佳玲, 王芳. 绿色技术创新、产业集聚与生态效率——以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2395-2406.
[2]	王丰龙, 曾刚, 叶琴, 陈弘挺. 基于创新合作联系的城市网络格局分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 797-805.
[3]	武晓静, 杜德斌, 肖刚, 管明明. 长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 490-499.
[4]	谢雅婷, 周忠发, 闫利会, 牛颖超, 王历. 贵州省石漠化敏感区生态红线空间分异与管控措施研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 624-630.
[5]	成定平, 淦苏美. 长江经济带高技术产业投入产出效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 325-332.
[6]	徐小任, 徐勇. 长江经济带后备适宜建设用地潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1789-1796.
[7]	李嬛, 宁越敏, 魏也华, 陈斐然. 长江经济带沿江城市群空间分布格局与联动机理研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1797-1806.
[8]	郭庆宾, 刘琪, 张冰倩. 环境规制是否抑制了国际R&D溢出效应——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1807-1814.
[9]	刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.
[10]	刘玮辰, 陆玉麒, 文玉钊. 长江经济带城市对外服务能力时空演变分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1475-1483.
[11]	傅钰, 钟业喜, 冯兴华. 长江经济带陆路交通可达性格局演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1484-1491.
[12]	任俊霖, 李浩, 伍新木, 李雪松. 基于主成分分析法的长江经济带省会城市水生态文明评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1537-1544.
[13]	宓泽锋, 曾刚, 尚勇敏, 陈弘挺, 朱菲菲, 陈斐然. 长江经济带市域生态文明建设现状及发展潜力初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1438-1447.
[14]	樊敏, 郭亚琳, 李富程, 王青. 岷江上游植被生境适应性空间分异格局的间隙度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1078-1085.
[15]	丁军, 黄茹, 吕拉昌. 基于专利授权数的长江经济带创新差异的多尺度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 868-876.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed