长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (09): 1388-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201709011

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖北省道路网络中心性与土地利用景观格局关系分析

银超慧 1, 郄  昱3, 刘艳芳1,2* ,张翔晖1   

  1. (1.武汉大学资源与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2.武汉大学教育部地理信息系统重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430079;3.法国格勒诺布尔城市规划院 城市规划与国际合作专业)
  • 出版日期:2017-09-20

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROAD CENTRALITY AND LANDSCAPE IN HUBEI PROVINCE

YIN Chao-hui1, QIE Yu3,LIU Yan-fang1, 2, ZHANG Xiang-hui 1   

  1. (1. School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;2. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;3.Urban Plauning and Internatoonal Cooperation,Grenoble Urban Planuing Institate France)
  • Online:2017-09-20

摘要: 深入理解道路网络与土地利用之间的关系有助于开展可持续的土地利用与道路网络规划。引入多中心性评价模型,对临近中心性、中介中心性、直线中心性3个指标,运用UNA对湖北省道路网络中心性进行测度;选取景观百分比,香农多样性指数,平均斑块大小,平均形状指数4个景观格局指数计算土地利用景观格局特征,并通过斯皮尔曼相关方法对两者之间的关系进行探讨。结果表明:(1)湖北省道路网络中心性格局和空间特征各异,整体上东高西低,临近中心性呈现条带状分布,中介中心性呈孔隙状分布,直线中心性呈片状分布;(2)景观层面上,土地利用景观破碎化和多样化对直线中心性最为敏感,而临近中心性与中介中心性与景观格局指数关系相对复杂;(3)在类型层面上,道路网络中心性与各类土地利用景观格局相关性各异,其中高中心性区域对林地表现为鲜明的排斥和破碎化效应,而对建设用地表现为强烈的吸引和空间集聚现象。该研究以道路网络中心性视角探讨道路网络与土地利用景观格局之间的关系,为区域空间形态和构成及其相关影响因素提供了新的视角。

Abstract:  of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;2. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;3.Urban Plauning and Internatoonal Cooperation,Grenoble Urban Planuing Institate France)
Abstract:A thorough understanding of the relationship between road network and land use will help to develop sustainable land use and road network planning. This paper introduced the multiple centrality assessment model of closeness, betweenness and straightness, by using the UNA to measure the road network centrality in Hubei province, then we selected four landscape metrics including the percentage of landscape, Shannon diversity index, mean patch size, and the mean shape index to quantify the landscape pattern. Spearman rank correlation was employed to explore the relationship between road network and the land use. The results showed that: (1) there were different spatial patterns of centrality in Hubei province, higher value of centrality always emerges in the east while the lower value always in the west. The closeness showed ribbon distribution and the betweenness displays porously, however, the straightness presented a patchy pattern; (2) at landscape level, the landscape fragmentation and diversification were mostly sensitive to the straightness, but relatively complex with the closeness and betweenness; (3) at class level, the relationship between road centrality and the landscape patterns of various land-use types differ greatly. Specifically, the area with centrality advantages showed strong rejection and fragmentation effect to forest land-use while turns out to be strong attraction and agglomeration phenomenon to construction land-use. These findings provide a new perspective to the regional spatial form and its composition and its related factors through discussing the relationship between road network centrality and land use pattern.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[5] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .