长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (11): 1752-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201711004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同类型环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的影响比较研究——以长江经济带为例

郭庆宾,2,刘  琪2,张冰倩3*   

  1. (1.中南财经政法大学应用经济学博士后流动站,湖北 武汉 430073;2.湖北大学商学院,湖北 武汉 430062;3.广西大学商学院,广西 南宁 530004)
  • 出版日期:2017-11-20

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON INTERNATIONAL R&D SPILLOVERS: A CASE STUDY OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT#br#

GUO Qing-bin1,2,LIU Qi2,ZHANG Bing-qian3   

  1. (1.Post-doctoral Mobile Station,Zhongnan University of Economic and Law,Wuhan 430073,China;2. School of Business Hubei University,Wuhan 430062,China;3. Business School Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China)
  • Online:2017-11-20

摘要: 基于2003~2014年长江经济带的省际面板数据探讨了不同类型的环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的影响,通过熵值法客观赋权,构建命令控制型、市场激励型和自愿参与型3种环境规制指数,进一步考察了不同类型的环境规制对国际R&D溢出的影响。研究表明:(1)环境规制对国际R&D溢出水平呈现“反N型”曲线关系,虽然类型不同,但随着环境规制强度不断提升,国际R&D溢出效应均呈现先下降、后上升、再下降的趋势;(2)不同类型的环境规制对国际R&D溢出的作用具有异质性,当前在长江经济带发挥作用的主要是命令控制型和市场激励型环境规制,自愿参与型环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的激励作用尚未完全显现。结论在一定程度上印证了“波特假说”在开放条件下也是成立的,最后依据上述结论提出了相应的政策建议。

Abstract: Based on the provincial panel data of Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2003 to 2014, this paper discusses the influence of different types of environmental regulations on international R&D spillover effect. Through the objective weighting of entropy method, building three kinds of environmental regulation indices, such as order-driven, market-driven and voluntary-driven, furtherinvestigated the influence of different types of environmental regulations on international R&D spillovers, the study shows that: (1) The environmental regulation has a “Anti-N” curve relation to the international R&D spill level. Although the types are different, showing a tendency that the international R&D spillover effect decreases first, then rises and then decreases with the increasing intensity of environmental regulation.(2) Different types of environmental regulation are heterogeneous to the international R&D spillovers. The order-driven and market-driven environmental regulation play major roles in the Yangtze River economic belt currently, and the incentive effect of voluntary participatory environmental regulation on the international R&D spillover effect has not beenfully present yet. The conclusions of this paper confirms that the “Porter hypothesis” is also established under open conditionsin someextent. Finally, according to the above-mentionedconclusions, we put forward some corresponding policy recommendations.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 李 佳,李思悦,谭 香,张全发. 南水北调中线工程总干渠沿线经过河流水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[4] 邹丽敏, 王 超, 冯士龙. 玄武湖沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生物毒性风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[5] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[6] 陈 爽,王 进,. 太湖流域城市化水平及外来人口影响测评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[7] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[8] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[9] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[10] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,郭立群,柴 勇,和丽萍,张正海. 云南金沙江流域主要森林植被类型分布格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 51 .