长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (03): 638-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803020

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

丹江口水库入库水量与气象因子的响应及其预测

秦鹏程,刘 敏,肖莺,王苗,方思达,任永建   

  1.  
    (武汉区域气候中心,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 出版日期:2018-03-20

Response of Danjiangkou Reservoir Inflow to Meteorological Factors and Forecasting

QIN Pengcheng, LIU Min, XIAO Ying, WANG Miao, FANG Sida, REN Yongjian#br#   

  1. (Wuhan Regional Climate Center, Wuhan 430074, China)
  • Online:2018-03-20

摘要:

利用丹江口水库1959~2016年逐月入库流量及水源区41个气象站同期气象观测资料,通过相关分析确定了影响入库水量的关键气象因子及其影响时效,利用回归分析建立了逐月入库流量预报模型并对误差来源进行了系统分析。结果表明:各月入库水量与前期不同月份降水量呈显著正相关,最大相关系数0.40~0.85,与平均气温呈显著负相关,最大相关系数-0.26~-0.54,其中汛期月份相关性高,影响时效在前1~3个月,冬春季相关性较弱,影响时效在2~6个月。以前期不同月份降水量、气温为预报因子,采用对数变换后的逐步回归模型预报效果最好,各月解释方差在45%~88%之间,汛期月份在75%以上,十折交叉验证月平均绝对误差率20.5%~40.7%,年平均预测误差9.6%。降水的时空分布特征对预测误差具有明显影响,上游汉中、石泉、安康及白河子流域降水偏多,流域边缘降水偏少,预报结果偏低,反之预报结果偏高,同时降水集中或强度大预报结果易偏低,而降水时间分布均匀预报结果易偏高。
关键词: 丹江口水库;入库水量;回归分析;预报误差

Abstract:

Based on the monthly inflow data of Danjiangkou reservoir as well as the meteorological data of 41 weather stations in the upper basin during 1959-2016, the key meteorological factors and timing that affecting inflow were identified by correlation analysis, and then forecasting models for each month were established and systematic errors were also analyzed. The results show that the reservoir inflow is significantly and positively correlated with precipitation, with the highest correlation ranging from 0.45 to 0.85 for each month, and negatively correlated with temperature, with the highest correlation ranging from -0.26 to -0.54. generally, the rainy season has a higher correlation, and the influencing timing is in the latest 1-3 months, while the nonrainy season has a lower correlation, with a more longer influencing timing of 2-6 months. Using mean temperature and precipitation in the last several months as predictor variables, stepwise regression model with logarithmic transformations was chosen as the best fitted model, the models could explain 45%-88% of the total variance for each month, and more than 75% for rainy season months. 10-fold cross validation give a mean absolute percentage error within 20.5%-40.7% for each month, and 9.6% for whole year. The spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation can have a significant impact on forecast accuracy, with precipitation of the upper subbasin of hanzhong, shiquan, ankang and baihe above normal level, or precipitation in the edge of the basin below normal level, there may be a lower forecast discrepancy, while higher forecast discrepancy on the contrary, and a more concentrated or heavy precipitation results in a lower forecast discrepancy, a more even precipitation distribution leads to higher discrepancy.
Key words:Danjiangkou Reservoir; inflow; regression analysis; forecasting error

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈 勇,陈国阶,杨定国. 岷江上游聚落分布规律及其生态特征——以四川理县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 72 -77 .
[2] 陈正洪,万素琴,毛以伟. 三峡库区复杂地形下的降雨时空分布特点分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 623 -627 .
[3] 张磊,董立新,吴炳方,周万村. 三峡水库建设前后库区10年土地覆盖变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 107 -112 .
[4] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[5] 禹 娜,陈立侨,赵泉鸿. 太湖介形类动物丰度与生物量[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[6] 孔令强. 水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 185 .
[7] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[8] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[9] 于苏俊,张 继,夏永秋. 基于遗传算法的可持续土地利用动态规划[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 180 -184 .
[10] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .