长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (06): 1198-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201806003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

发达地区农户宅基地置换意愿多水平影响因素研究——来自苏州与常州的实证

舒帮荣1,朱寿红1,李永乐2*,陈利洪1,镇风华1   


  1. (1. 江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 南京财经大学公共管理学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-20

Multi-level Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Willingness on Rural Homestead Replacement in Developed Area: A Case Study from Suzhou and Changzhou#br#

SHU Bang-rong1, ZHU Shou-hong1, LI Yong-le2, CHEN Li-hong1, ZHEN Feng-hua1#br#   

  1. (1.School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China; 2. School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2018-06-20

摘要: 已有农民宅基地置换意愿影响因素分析主要基于单一水平,忽略了影响因素的多尺度效应。对此,引入多水平回归模型,基于对地处经济发达地区的苏州和常州的17个村394个农户的调查,研究多水平影响因素对农民宅基地置换意愿的作用机理。结果显示:(1)苏州地区农户宅基地置换意愿较常州地区低,各村农户置换意愿存在显著差异,且这一差异中75.12%的份额由村庄差异造成;(2)农户层次的年龄、文化程度、家庭主要收入来源对农民宅基地置换意愿具有显著正向作用,家庭人数具有负向作用;(3)村级户均收入、环境水平对家庭主要收入来源影响置换意愿起着弱化作用,而村经济发展水平、到最近城镇的距离具有强化作用;村级因素解释了95.69%的主要收入来源与置换意愿间的相关关系。研究表明,村级因素通过改变农户层次因素的影响程度,进而导致了村级间农户置换意愿的差异。因此,需综合考虑农户及村级层次的因素,并从完善相关配套政策及保障体系、加大政策宣传力度、优化宅基地布局、完善公共服务设施、加大环境治理、提升农户增收能力等方面推动宅基地置换工作。
关键词: 农村宅基地;置换意愿;多水平Logistic模型;村级水平;农户水平

Abstract: Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness on homestead replacement (FWHR) were usually detected based on single level in previous studies, in which multi-level effects of the factors were ignored. To solve this issue, questionnaire survey was conducted on 394 households from 17 villages in Suzhou and Changzhou, which are located in the developed area, and multi-level factors’ effects on FWHR were analyzed by using multi-level regression model. Results show that the farmers’ willingness in Suzhou is lower than that in Changzhou, and significant difference of FWHR exists in different villages, 75.12% of which can be attributed to the differences among villages. The factors of age, education level, and the main source of household’s income have significant positive effects on FWHR, while the family size has negative effect on FWHR. The village’s average income of households and the environmental level significantly weaken the positive relationship between farmers’ main income source and FWHR, while the level of village’s economic development and distance to the nearest city or town strengthen the aforementioned positive relationship. In addition, the factors from the village-level explain 95.69% of the correlation between farmers’ main income source and FWHR. It is indicated that factors from village-level lead to the difference of the FWHR among villages through changing the influence degree of the factors from farmer-level. Therefore, to promote the work of farmers’ homestead replacement, the influencing factors from farmer-level and village-level should be considered comprehensively, the relevant supporting policies and social security system should be improved. Meanwhile, the publicity of rural homestead replacement polices should be strengthened, the rural homestead planning should be optimized. In addition, the public service facilities and the environment in rural area should be improved, as well as the farmers’ income should be increased.
Key words:rural homestead; replacement willingness; multi-level logistic regression model; village level; farmer level

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!