长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (07): 1314-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201807001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例

张鑫,陈志刚   

  1. (1.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏 南京 210023;2.国土资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-11-09

Economic Growth Incentive, Local Officials’ Characteristics and Urban Industrial Pollution:#br# A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta

ZHANG Xin1,2,CHEN Zhigang1,2   

  1. (1.School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023,China;2.Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210023,China
  • Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-11-09

摘要: 地方政府尤其是地方官员的决策行为对于一个城市工业污染的程度及其变化有着不可忽略的影响。首先探讨了地方官员的个体差异及其行为特征对城市工业污染的影响机理;然后以长三角地区为例,通过建立地方官员特征指标与城市工业污染间关系的计量模型,运用2005~2014年的相关统计数据,实证检验了地方官员异质性(主要体现为年龄、任期和晋升来源等方面的差异)对城市工业污染的具体影响。结果发现,地方官员的年龄、任期和晋升来源等因素对于城市工业污染有着不同程度的影响:(1)地方官员年龄增加对城市工业污染的影响表现为先增后减的倒U型变化趋势;(2)地方官员任期增加对城市工业污染的影响呈先减后增的趋势;(3)本地晋升官员相对于外地晋升官员,其执政下的城市工业污染程度会有所缓减。最后就有效管控城市工业污染,从完善地方官员晋升机制、健全地方官员环境考核制度等方面提出了相关政策建议

Abstract: The decisionmaking behavior of local governments, especially local officials, has a nonnegligible impact on urban industrial pollution. This paper discussed the relationship between local officials’ characteristics and urban industrial pollution. Yangtze River Delta area is selected as the research area to tested the effect of local officials’ characteristics (Age, Tenure and Promotion) on urban industrial pollution using the relevant data from 2005 to 2014. The results show that the factors such as age, tenure and promotion of local officials had different effects on urban industrial pollution: (1) With the increase of officials age, industrial pollution increased first and then decreased. (2) Officials prefer to reduce industrial pollution in the early years of the administration. However, over time, the industrial pollution will be aggravated. (3) Compared to officials th〖JP〗at transferred from other cities, the intensity of urban industrial pollution under locally officials administration will be slowed down. For effective control of urban industrial pollution,we put forward some policy suggestions from the aspects of improving the promotion mechanism of local officials and improving the environmental assessment system of local officials

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谢贤健 | 屈小斌 | 兰代萍 | 胡学华. 中小城市土地利用空间结构分析的尺度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(07): 897 .
[2] 涂洁|刘琪璟|王辉民|廖迎春|李燕燕. 江西千烟洲木荷液流特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 267 .
[3] 李一曼, 修春亮. 浙江省陆路交通可达性与经济社会协调性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 751 .
[4] 魏玲霞,周轶慧,王莹,仇雁翎,朱志良,赵建夫. 淀山湖水生生物中有机氯化合物的浓度与富集特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(01): 128 .
[5] 马彩虹, 赵晶, 谭晨晨. 基于IPCC方法的湖南省温室气体排放核算及动态分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1786 -1792 .
[6] 龚志军, 李艳, 张敏, 蔡永久, 薛庆举, 许浩. 大型浅水湖泊太湖霍甫水丝蚓次级生产力的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2054 -2060 .
[7] 荆锐, 陈江龙, 田柳. 国家级新区发展异质性及驱动机制研究——以上海浦东新区和南京江北新区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 859 -867 .
[8] 陈晶, 顾世祥, 何大明, 陈刚. 近60多年来滇池流域干旱特性及重现期分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1457 -1465 .
[9] 曾胜兰, 王雅芳. 成都地区污染天气分型及其污染气象特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 59 -67 .
[10] 尹继清, 范弢, 晏朋. 滇东南峰林湖盆区表层岩溶泉水化学动态变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 747 -754 .