长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (05): 1176-1184.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201905017

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

个人规范对农户亲环境行为的影响分析——基于拓展的规范激活理论框架

郭清卉1,李昊2,李世平1*,刘丽3   

  1. (1. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;2. 兰州大学经济学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;3. 山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院,山西 临汾 041000)
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-22

Analysis of the Influence of Personal Norms on Farmers’ Proenvironmental Behavior—— Based on the Extended Theory of Norm activation

GUO Qing-hui1, LI Hao2, Li Shi-ping1, LIU Li3   

  1. (1. College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 2. School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3. College of History and Tourism Culture, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000, China)
  • Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-22

摘要: 农户的亲环境行为可在一定程度上缓解农业环境污染,为改善农业环境,探寻农户实施亲环境行为的原因所在,将农户环境污染感知、环境关心和社会规范加入规范激活理论框架对其进行拓展,在此基础上,通过构建结构方程模型和层次回归模型,利用陕西、山西、甘肃、安徽和江苏5省的实地调查数据,对农户的亲环境行为进行分析。结果表明:农户的亲环境个人规范、环境污染感知和环境关心均可对其亲环境行为产生直接的正向影响,且个人规范对行为的影响程度最大;结果意识、责任归属、农户的环境污染感知和环境关心均可对其亲环境的个人规范产生直接的正向影响,且其影响程度从高到低依次为:结果意识、责任归属、环境污染感知和环境关心;农户的环境污染感知和环境关心可同时对其亲环境行为产生直接和间接影响作用,而结果意识和责任归属仅可对其亲环境行为产生间接影响作用;社会规范可正向调节个人规范对农户亲环境行为的影响。

Abstract: The farmers’ pro-environmental behavior can alleviate agricultural environmental pollution to a certain extent. In order to improve the agricultural environment and explore the reasons why farmers implement pro environmental behavior, this paper adds farmers’ perception of environmental pollution, environmental concern and social norms to extend the theory of norm-activation. On this basis, this paper uses field survey data from shaanxi, shanxi, gansu, anhui and jiangsu provinces to analyze the farmers’ pro-environmental behavior through the structural equation model and hierarchical regression model. The results show that the farmers’ pro-environmental personal norms, perception of environmental pollution and environmental concern have direct positive influences on their pro-environmental behavior, and the individual norms have the greatest influence on behavior. Awareness of consequence, ascription of responsibility, farmers’ perception of environmental pollution and environmental concern all have direct positive impacts on their proenvironmental personal norms, and the degree of their influence ranges from high to low is: awareness of consequence, ascription of responsibility, perception of environmental pollution and environmental concern; Farmers’ perception of environmental pollution and environmental concern have direct and indirect effects on their pro-environmental behaviors at the same time, while the awareness of consequence and ascription of responsibility only have indirect effects on their pro-environmental behavior. Social norms can positively regulate the influence of personal norms on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775 -780 .
[2] 王里奥,黄 川,詹艳慧,袁 辉. 三峡库区消落带淹水—落干过程土壤磷吸附—解吸及释放研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 593 -597 .
[3] 常青山,马祥庆,王志勇. 南方重金属矿区重金属的污染特征及评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 395 .
[4] 曹 昀,王国祥. 水生高等植物对悬浮泥沙的去除研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 340 .
[5] 胡振鹏, 葛, 刚, 刘成林, 陈伏生, 李, 述. 鄱阳湖湿地植物生态系统结构及湖水位对其影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 597 .
[6] 周 华 |周生路 |金平华. 江苏省种粮补贴区域差异化理论与实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1342 .
[7] 李杨杰, 陈振楼, 王初, 胡泓. 长江口潮间带湿地涨退潮期N2O的排放通量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 408 .
[8] 马才学, 赵利利, 柯新利. 湖北省耕地非农化压力的时空演变格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 71 -78 .
[9] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[10] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .