长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (05): 1235-1243.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201905023

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

湘江干流水环境质量演变特征及其关键因素定量识别

曹艳敏1,毛德华1*,吴昊2,张华3,张健4   

  1. (1.湖南师范大学 资源与环境科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081;2.军事新能源技术研究所,北京 102300 ;3.长沙市住房和城乡建设委员会,湖南 长沙 410081;4. 湖南省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司,湖南 长沙 410007)
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-22

The Evolution Features of Water Environmental Quality and Quantitative Identification of Key Factors on Xiangjiang River

CAO Yan-min1, MAO De-hua1, WU Hao2 ,ZHANG Hua3 ,ZHANG jian4   

  1. (1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081,China; 2.Military new energy technology research institute, Beijing 102300,China;3.Changsha Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban Rural Development, Changsha 410081,China;4. Hunan Provincial Communications Planning, Survey&Design Institute Co,LTD, Changsha 410007,China)
  • Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-22

摘要: 为科学有效地保护湘江流域水环境,定量识别湘江干流主要水质指标的驱动因素,该研究基于1990~2016年水质监测数据及沿岸永州长沙五市社会经济发展指标,采用Mann-Kendall检验法分析湘江干流水环境演变趋势,通过逐步回归分析确定各地区各水质指标主要驱动因素。结果表明:湘江干流CODMn、Cd、As整体呈下降趋势,上游BOD5呈下降趋势,上中游NH3-N呈上升趋势,中游衡阳、株洲市重金属Cr6+呈上升趋势,衡阳市TP呈上升趋势,中下游BOD5呈上升趋势;定量追溯各水质指标影响因素得出工业污染是湘江干流重金属As、Cr6+、Cd主要驱动因素,永衡株潭地区NH3-N,衡阳市BOD5、CODMn、TP及衡株潭地区BOD5均以农业污染影响为主;发现产业结构调整对干流水环境有显著影响,建议在流域产业结构调整过程中加强转型升级。

Abstract: In order to protect the water environment of Xiangjiang River scientifically and effectively, and quantitative identify the main driving factors of water quality. In this paper, the Mann Kendall was used to analyze the water environment evolution trend of Xiangjiang river trunk stream, the stepwise regression analysis methods were used to determines the main driving factors of water quality indexes in different regions, which is based on water quality monitoring data from 1990 to 2016 and socioeconomic development indicators of cities along the coast. The results show that CODMn, Cd and As was downtrend, BOD5 shows an downtrend in the upper reaches, the pollution of NH3-N in the upper and middle reaches shows an upward trend,TP in Hengyang shows an upward trend, in the middle reaches of Hengyang and Zhuzhou regions, heavy metal Cr6+ shows an increasing trend, BOD5 in the middle and lower reaches shows an increasing trend; It is concluded that industrial pollution is the main driving factor of heavy metals As, Cr6+and Cd in Xiangjiang River trunk stream. NH3-N in Yong Heng Zhu Tan, BOD5, CODMn, TP in Hengyang and BOD5 in Heng Zhu Tan are mainly affected by agricultural pollution; it is found that the industrial structure adjustment has a significant impact on the water environment, it is suggested to strengthen the transformation and upgrading in the process of industrial structure adjustment in the basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈德福,史学正,吕成文,于东升. 江苏沿江地区土壤肥力空间分布及其区域对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 316 -321 .
[2] 李燕玲, 刘爱民. 长江流域冬季农业主要作物的耕地竞争机制及案例研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 146 .
[3] 杨桂芳, 彭红霞, 陈中原, 李长安, 黄俊华, 胡超涌. 兰州与江汉平原有机碳同位素的古气候指示意义对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 486 -490 .
[4] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[5] 王宜虎,崔 旭,陈 雯. 南京市经济发展与环境污染关系的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 142 -146 .
[6] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[7] 蔡邦成,陆根法,宋莉娟,陈克亮. 南水北调东线水源地保护区生态建设的生态经济效益评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 384 -387 .
[8] 张昌顺,李 昆,马姜明,郑志新. 施肥对印楝人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 329 .
[9] 王玲杰. 偏最小二乘回归法在非点源污染年负荷量估算中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 810 .
[10] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .